Skip to main content
  • 12 Accesses

Abstract

On October 19, 1666, John Harrison, Esquire, steward on the Benham Valente, Berkshire estate of the earl of Craven, convened the court leet and court baron for the manor. The completion of the harvest and the corresponding ritard in the pre-industrial rhythms of the English agricultural year once again allowed the members of this agrarian community to turn to the matters that required their collective attention. To undertake a fuller comparison of social behavior between the “Old World” and the “New” requires a clearer understanding of the character of this sort of institution that continued to provide the basis of order for so many English people even after the Civil Wars.62

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E.A. Wrigley and R.S. Schofield, The Population of England, 1541–1871 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981), has placed the English population at 2,984,576 in 1561, 4,109,981 in 1601, 5,091,725 in 1641, 4,982,687 in 1671, and 5,057,790 in 1701, at pp. 208–09. They estimate that births exceeded deaths by 7.411 million between 1541 and 1801, at p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard Hakluyt, A Discourse on Western Planting [London, 1584] in E.G.R. Taylor, ed., The Original Writings and Correspondence of the Two Richard Hakluyts, 2 vols. (London: Hakluyt Society, 1935), I, pp. 233–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard Greaves, Deliver Us from Evil: The Radical Underground in Britain, 1660–1663 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986); idem, Enemies Under His Feet: Radicals and Nonconformists in Britain, 1664–1667 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keith Wrightson, English Society, 1580–1680 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1990 [1982]), pp. 121–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peter Clark and David Souden, “Introduction” in Clark and Souden, eds., Migration & Society in Early Modern England (Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble, 1987), pp. 11–48,

    Google Scholar 

  6. and Paul Slack, Poverty and Policy in Tudor and Stuart England (London: Longman, 1988). The latter study does not consider colonization.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bailyn, The Peopling of British North America, p. 7; Greene, Pursuits of Happiness; Wrightson, English Society, pp. 40–57; Alan Macfarlane, The Origins of English Individualism: The Family, Property and Social Transition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), pp. 7–61;

    Google Scholar 

  8. Perez Zagorin, Rebels and Rulers, 1500–1660, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), I, pp. 87–139.

    Google Scholar 

  9. In addition to the Carolina pamphlets discussed below, John Hammond, Leah and Rachel, or, The Two Fruitfull Sisters, Virginia and Mary-Land [London, 1656] in Clayton Colman Hall, ed., Narratives of Early Maryland, 1633–1684 (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1953 [New York, 1910]), pp. 277–308 at 288–300; Willliam Penn, A Further Account of the Province of Pennsylvania [London, 1685] in Albert Cook Myers, ed., Narratives of Early Pennsylvania, West New Jersey, and Delaware (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1912), pp. 255–78 at 262–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jack P. Greene, ed., Selling a New World: Two Colonial South Carolina Promotional Pamphlets (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989), pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H.N. Sainsbury, ed., Documents in the British Public Record Office Relating to South Carolina, 5 vols. (Atlanta, 1928–47), I, pp. 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Although early modern English people generally recognized landed estates as the barometer of status and the platform for liberties, some of the advertised advantages of Carolina, such as liberty of conscience and ballots in elections, reflect an apparent influence of the republican political theorist, James Harrington, J.G.A. Pocock, Harrington: The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [1992]), pp. 11, 13, 100–01, 114–18, 126. See also the fragment endorsed by Locke, “Carolina, A draught of some laws,” a copy of which was graciously provided to me by the late Peter Laslett. Crucially, of course, the province remained part of the English monarchy.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sir Francis Bacon, “On Plantations” in C.W. Eliot, ed., Essays, Civil and Moral and New Atlantis (Danbury, CT: Grolier Enterprises Corp., 1988 [1909]), pp. 85–87 at 85; Thomas Woodward to Lords Proprietors, June 2, 1665, in CRNC, I, pp. 99–101 at 100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 L.H. Roper

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roper, L.H. (2004). Genesis. In: Conceiving Carolina. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973474_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973474_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52836-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7347-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics