Abstract
During the Cold War, most arms control initiatives were conducted on a bilateral basis between the United States and Soviet Union, and thus are beyond the scope of this book. The major exceptions to this were efforts to control or ban chemical and biological weapons, which continued into the 1990s, and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1970, which came up for renewal in 1995. Early in the 1990s, the United States and European states compromised over the details of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). There were few major disagreements between Europeans and Americans with respect to extending the NPT. The Mine Ban Treaty (MBT), negotiated at Oslo and signed in Ottawa in December 1997, was different. Europeans and Americans were unable to agree on the details, and the treaty entered into force without U.S. participation. Similar disagreements persisted in two later cases, the Small Arms Program of Action and a verification protocol for the Biological (Bacteriological) and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC). In both of these, the United States prevented agreements from being reached. Over this time period, then, we see a sharp decrease in the level of transatlantic cooperation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
3 Arms Control
Michael Binyon, “America Forces Out UN Arms Director,” The Times (London), 23 April 2002, http://www.thetimes.co.uk.
Richard Butler, “Nuclear Testing and National Honor,” The New York Times, July 13, 2001, http://www.nytimes.com/.
Colum Lynch, “U.S. Boycotts Nuclear Test Ban Meeting: Some Delegates at U.N. Session Upset at Latest Snub of Pact Bush Won’t Back,” Washington Post, November 12, 2001, A06.
Walter Pincus, “U.S. to Seek Options On New Nuclear Tests: White House Worries About Arsenal’s Reliability,” The Washington Post, 8 January 2002, A04.
Mike Allen, “U.S. Seeks To Stiffen Treaty on Germ War: Pact’s Enforcement Mechanism Faulted,” Washington Post, 17 October 2001, A21.
Jenni Rissanen, “Endgame in Earnest: First Draft of Final Declaration Issued on Penultimate Day,” BWC Review Conference Bulletin, The Acronym Institute, 6 December 2001.
Emma Jane Kirby, “Bio-Weapons Talks Suspended: The U.S. Says Work on the Ban will Continue,” BBC News, 7 December 2001, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world
Rissanen, “alm After the Storm: General Debate Concludes as The Hard Work Begins,” BWC Review Conference Bulletin, The Acronym Institute, 26 November 2001
Rissanen, “Differences and Difficulties as Delegates Consider Wide Range of Proposals,” BWC Review Conference Bulletin, The Acronym Institute, 30 November 2001.
Steven Erlanger, “Bush’s Move on ABM Pact Gives Pause to Europeans,” The New York Times, 13 December 2001, http://www.nytimes.com/.
David Charter, “Straw Backs Missile Defence,” The Times (London), 21 November 2001, http://www.thetimes.co.uk
David R. Sands, “Germany: Missile Defense Won’t Hurt Ties,” The Washington Times, 27 July 2001, http://www.washingtonpost.com.
Copyright information
© 2004 Thomas S. Mowle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mowle, T.S. (2004). Arms Control. In: Allies at Odds? The United States and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973320_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973320_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-6653-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7332-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)