Skip to main content

Arms Control

  • Chapter
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

During the Cold War, most arms control initiatives were conducted on a bilateral basis between the United States and Soviet Union, and thus are beyond the scope of this book. The major exceptions to this were efforts to control or ban chemical and biological weapons, which continued into the 1990s, and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1970, which came up for renewal in 1995. Early in the 1990s, the United States and European states compromised over the details of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). There were few major disagreements between Europeans and Americans with respect to extending the NPT. The Mine Ban Treaty (MBT), negotiated at Oslo and signed in Ottawa in December 1997, was different. Europeans and Americans were unable to agree on the details, and the treaty entered into force without U.S. participation. Similar disagreements persisted in two later cases, the Small Arms Program of Action and a verification protocol for the Biological (Bacteriological) and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC). In both of these, the United States prevented agreements from being reached. Over this time period, then, we see a sharp decrease in the level of transatlantic cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

3 Arms Control

  1. Michael Binyon, “America Forces Out UN Arms Director,” The Times (London), 23 April 2002, http://www.thetimes.co.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard Butler, “Nuclear Testing and National Honor,” The New York Times, July 13, 2001, http://www.nytimes.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colum Lynch, “U.S. Boycotts Nuclear Test Ban Meeting: Some Delegates at U.N. Session Upset at Latest Snub of Pact Bush Won’t Back,” Washington Post, November 12, 2001, A06.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walter Pincus, “U.S. to Seek Options On New Nuclear Tests: White House Worries About Arsenal’s Reliability,” The Washington Post, 8 January 2002, A04.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mike Allen, “U.S. Seeks To Stiffen Treaty on Germ War: Pact’s Enforcement Mechanism Faulted,” Washington Post, 17 October 2001, A21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jenni Rissanen, “Endgame in Earnest: First Draft of Final Declaration Issued on Penultimate Day,” BWC Review Conference Bulletin, The Acronym Institute, 6 December 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emma Jane Kirby, “Bio-Weapons Talks Suspended: The U.S. Says Work on the Ban will Continue,” BBC News, 7 December 2001, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rissanen, “alm After the Storm: General Debate Concludes as The Hard Work Begins,” BWC Review Conference Bulletin, The Acronym Institute, 26 November 2001

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rissanen, “Differences and Difficulties as Delegates Consider Wide Range of Proposals,” BWC Review Conference Bulletin, The Acronym Institute, 30 November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steven Erlanger, “Bush’s Move on ABM Pact Gives Pause to Europeans,” The New York Times, 13 December 2001, http://www.nytimes.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Charter, “Straw Backs Missile Defence,” The Times (London), 21 November 2001, http://www.thetimes.co.uk

    Google Scholar 

  12. David R. Sands, “Germany: Missile Defense Won’t Hurt Ties,” The Washington Times, 27 July 2001, http://www.washingtonpost.com.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Thomas S. Mowle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mowle, T.S. (2004). Arms Control. In: Allies at Odds? The United States and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973320_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics