Abstract
Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler (1998, p. 567) find that ‘the probability of civil war and its duration are a function of the gains from … and the costs of rebellion, made up of the opportunity costs of conflict and the cost of coordination, [based on] four proxies, namely per capita income, the natural resource endowment, population size, and the extent of ethno-linguistic fractionalisation.’ They rely on a variable of cultural distinctness, ethnolinguistic fractionalization (ELF), first used by P. Mauro (1995, p. 692) to explain the rate of growth. ELF is based on Atlas Naradov Mira (Department of Geodesy and Cartography of the State Geological Committee of the USSR 1964), ‘whose goal was to provide an extremely accurate depiction of the ethnolinguistic composition of world population’ (Mauro pp. 692, 711). For Collier and Hoeffler, all variables in the equations are significant in explaining war duration, and all variables except ELF are significant in explaining the probability of war occurring (Collier and Hoeffler 1998, pp. 568–9).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 E. Wayne Nafziger and Juha Auvinen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nafziger, E.W., Auvinen, J. (2003). Ethnicity, Political Economy, and Conflict. In: Economic Development, Inequality and War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403943767_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403943767_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51380-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-4376-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)