Skip to main content
  • 179 Accesses

Abstract

The year 1999 saw two important anniversaries for scholars of the civil wars and interregnum, as well as for the cultural heritage of Britain. The fact that the 400th anniversary of the birth of Oliver Cromwell received a great deal more attention than the 350th anniversary of the trial and execution of Charles I was perhaps strangely appropriate, given that Cromwell has long been a more popular subject for both popular and academic scrutiny than the proceedings in the High Court of Justice. However, the papers in this volume, first delivered at a conference to mark the anniversary of the gruesome end to the life of Charles I, will I hope go some way towards rejuvenating the study of events which are probably the most dramatic in English history, as well as being of curiously contemporary resonance in an era when the future of the monarchy is once more on the political agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. Sachse, ‘England’s Black Tribunal’, JBS, XII (1973), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Nenner, ‘The Trial of Charles I and the Failed Search for a Bounded Monarchy’, in G.J. Schochet, ed., Restoration, Ideology and Restoration (Washington, Folger Institute, 1990), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Walzer, ‘Regicide and Revolution’, Social Research, XL (1973), 617–42; Sachse, ‘England’s Black Tribunal’, pp. 70–1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.R. Williamson, The Day they Killed the King (London, Frederick Muller, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.V. Wedgwood, The Trial of Charles I (London, Collins, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.G. Muddiman, The Trial of King Charles I (London, W. Hodge & Co. 1928).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Bate, The Lives, Actions and Execution of the Prime Actors (1661); The True Characters of the Educations, Inclinations and Several Dispositions of All and Every One of Those Bloody Barbarous Persons (1661).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Winstanley, The Loyall Martyrology (1665); Regicides No Saints Nor Martyrs, Freely Expostulated With the Publication of Ludlow’s Third Volume (1700).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Wood, Athenae Oxonienses, ed. P. Bliss (4 vols, Oxford, 1848).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Noble, The Lives of the English Regicides (1798).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.L. Rowse, The Regicides (London, Duckworth, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. HERO, MS 3676; J. Nalson, A True Copy of the Journal of the High Court of Justice for the Tryal of K. Charles I (1684)

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Lockyer, ed., The Trial of Charles I (London, Folio Society, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muddiman, Trial of King Charles I; D. Lagomarsino and C.J. Wood, eds, The Trial of Charles I, A Documentary History (London, University Press of New England, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gardiner, Civil War, IV, pp. 254–330; B. Manning, 1649: The Crisis of the English Revolution (London, Bookmarks, 1992); Muddiman, Trial of King Charles; Wedgwood, Trial of Charles I.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Gentles, The New Model Army (Oxford, Blackwell, 1992), pp. 266–314.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Underdown, Pride’s Purge (Oxford, OUP, 1971), pp. 173–207.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Worden, The Rump Parliament (Cambridge, CUP, 1974), pp. 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Kelsey, Inventing a Republic (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.R. MacCormack, Revolutionary Politics in the Long Parliament (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1973).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Howell, ‘Newcastle’s Regicide: the Parliamentary Career of John Blakiston’, Archaeologia Aeliana, 4th series, XLII (1964), 207–30.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H.L. Hubbard, ‘Colonel Francis Hacker, Parliamentarian and Regicide’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society, XLV (1941), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C.M. Williams, ‘The Anatomy of a Radical Gentleman: Henry Marten’, in D.H. Pennington and K.V. Thomas, eds, Puritans and Revolutionaries (Oxford, OUP, 1978), 118–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Waters, Henry Marten and the Long Parliament (Chepstow, Chepstow Society, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.C. Cole, ‘Some Notes on Henry Marten, the Regicide, and his Family’, Berkshire Archaeological Journal, XLIX (1949), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.C. Whitebrook, ‘Sir Thomas Andrewes, Lord Mayor and Regicide, and his Relations’, Transactions of the Congregational Historical Society, XIII (1939), 151–65.

    Google Scholar 

  27. W.L.F. Nuttall, ‘The Yorkshire Commissioners Appointed for the Trial of King Charles the First’, Yorkshire Archaeological Journal, XLIII (1971), 147–57.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W.L.F. Nuttall, ‘Commissioners for the Trial of Charles I’, Essex Journal, XIII (1978), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Ludlow, Memoirs, ed. C.H. Firth (2 vols, Oxford, OUP, 1894).

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Ludlow, A Voyce from the Watchtower, ed. A.B. Worden (London, Camden Society, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R.C.H. Catterall, ‘Sir George Downing and the Regicides’, American Historical Review, XVII (1912), pp. 268–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. G. de Lagrange-Ferregues, ‘Un Regicide Anglais a Nerac’, Revue de l’Agenais, XCI (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Marshall, Intelligence and Espionage in the Reign of Charles II, 1660–1685 (Cambridge, CUP, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. D.C. Wilson, ‘Web of Secrecy: Goffe, Whalley and the Legend of Hadley’, New England Quarterly, LX (1987), pp. 515–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. E. Stiles, A History of Three of the Judges of King Charles I (1794).

    Google Scholar 

  36. M.P. Schofield, ‘The Three Judges of New Haven’, History Today, XII (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  37. L.A. Welles, The Regicides in Connecticut (New Haven, Connecticut Commission on Historical Publications, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  38. M.L. Sargent, ‘Thomas Hutchinson, Ezra Stiles and the Legend of the Regicides’, William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, XLIX (1992), 431–48; Hutchinson Papers II (Prince Society II, New York, 1865); ‘Letters and Papers Relating to the Regicides’, Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society, 4th series, VIII (Boston, 1868), pp. 122–225; ‘Dixwell Papers’, Papers of the New Haven Colony Historical Society, VI (1900), pp. 337–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. T. Hutchinson, The History of the Colony and Province of Massachussets Bay, ed. L.S. Mayo (3 vols, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  40. V.L. Ruland, ‘A Royalist Account of Hugh Peters’ Arrest’, HLQ XVIII (1955), pp. 178–82.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J.M. Patrick, ‘The Arrest of Hugh Peters’, HLQ XIX (1956), pp. 343–51.

    Google Scholar 

  42. H. Nenner, ‘The Trial of the Regicides: Retribution and Treason in 1660’, in H. Nenner, ed., Politics and the Political Imagination in Later Stuart Britain (Rochester, University of Chicago Press, 1997), pp. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See also H. Nenner, The Right to be King (Basingstoke, Macmillan Press - now Palgrave, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  44. L.L. Knoppers, ‘This So Horrid Spectacle: Samson Agonistes and the Execution of the Regicides’, English Literary Renaissance, XX (1990), pp. 487–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. N.K. Maguire, Regicide and Restoration (Cambridge, CUP, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  46. In recent years there has been an attempt to counter some of the myths that have been allowed to survive unchallenged: S.M. Koenigsberg, ‘The Vote to Create the High Court of Justice: 26 to 20?’, Parliamentary History, XII (1993), pp. 281–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. Hast, ‘State Treason Trials During the Puritan Revolution, 1640–1660’, HJ, XV (1972), pp. 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Daniel P. Klein, ‘The Trial of Charles I’, Journal of Legal History, XVIII (1997), pp. 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. A.W. McIntosh, ‘The Number of the English Regicides’, History, LXVII (1982), pp. 195–216. The men in question were: Francis Allen, Thomas Andrewes, Thomas Hammond, Edmund Harvey, William Heveningham, Cornelius Holland, John Lisle, Nicholas Love, Isaac Pennington, Matthew Thomlinson.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. A.W. McIntosh, The Death Warrant of King Charles I (London, House of Lords Record Office, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. Sanderson, ‘But the People’s Creatures’. The Philosophical Basis of the English Civil War (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1989), pp. 142–74.

    Google Scholar 

  52. R. Tuck, Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651 (Cambridge, CUP, 1993), pp. 202–59.

    Google Scholar 

  53. R. Tuck, Natural Rights Theories (Cambridge, CUP, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. W. Haller, Liberty and Reformation in the Puritan Revolution (London, Columbia University Press, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  55. P. Zagorin, A History of Political Thought in the English Revolution (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1954), pp. 62–86.

    Google Scholar 

  56. J.A.W. Gunn, Politics and the Public Interest in the Seventeenth Century (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969), pp. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  57. C.C. Weston and J.R. Greenberg, Subjects and Sovereigns (Cambridge, CUP, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  58. M.A. Judson, From Tradition to Political Reality (Hamden, Archon Books, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  59. M.A. Judson, The Crisis of the Constitution (London, Rutgers University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  60. J.W. Allen, English Political Thought 1603–1644 (London, Methuen, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  61. J.P. Sommerville, Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640 (London, Longman, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  62. G. Burgess, The Politics of the Ancient Constitution (Basingstoke, Macmillan Press - now Palgrave, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  63. J.M. Wallace, ‘The Engagement Controversy, 1649–1652’, Bulletin of the New York Public Library, LXVIII (1964), pp. 384–405.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Q Skinner, ‘The Ideological Context of Hobbes’s Political Thought, HJ, IX (1966), pp. 286–317; his ‘Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy’, in G.E. Aylmer, ed., The Interregnum (London, Macmillan, 1972), pp. 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. G. Burgess, ‘Usurpation, Obligation and Obedience in the Thought of the Engagement Controversy’, HJ, XXIX (1986), pp. 515–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. D. Armitage, A. Himy and Q. Skinner, eds, Milton and Republicanism (Cambridge, CUP, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  67. B. Worden, ‘Classical Republicanism and the Puritan Revolution’, in H. Lloyd Jones, V. Pearl and B. Worden, eds, History and Imagination: Essays in Honour of H.R. Trevor-Roper (London, Duckworth, 1981), pp. 182–200; Idem, ‘Marchamont Nedham and the Beginnings of English Republicanism, 1649–1656’, in D. Wootton, ed., Republicanism, Liberty and Commercial Society, 1649–1776 (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Z. Fink, The Classical Republicans (Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  69. J. Collins, ‘Treason and Tyranny: Some Thoughts on the Trial and Execution of Charles I’, Rice University Studies, LX (1974), pp. 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  70. S. Barber, Regicide and Republicanism (Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  71. C.V. Wedgwood, ‘European Reaction to the Death of Charles I’, American Scholar, XXXIV (1965), pp. 431–46.

    Google Scholar 

  72. W.L. Sachse, ‘English Pamphlet Support for Charles I, November 1648 January 1649’, in W.A. Aiken and B.D. Henning, eds, Conflict in Stuart England (New York, Cape, 1960), pp. 147–68.

    Google Scholar 

  73. L. Potter, ‘Royal Actor as Royal Martyr: the Eikon Basilike and the Literary Scene in 1649’, in G.J. Schochet, ed., Restoration, Ideology and Restoration (Washington, 1990), pp. 217–40.

    Google Scholar 

  74. L. Potter, Secret Rites and Secret Writing. Royalist Literature 1641–1660 (Cambridge, CUP, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  75. F.J. Bremer, ‘In Defense of Regicide: John Cotton on the Execution of Charles I’, William and Mary Quarterly, XXXVII (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  76. N.H. Mayfield, Puritans and Regicides. Presbyterian-Independent Differences over the Trial and Execution of Charles (I) Stuart (London, University Press of America, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  77. P. Crawford, ‘Charles Stuart, That Man of Blood’, JBS, XVI (1977), pp. 41–61: p. 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peacey, J. (2001). Introduction. In: Peacey, J. (eds) The Regicides and the Execution of Charles I. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932815_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932815_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42182-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3281-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics