Abstract
Leprosy is a bacterial infection caused by Mycobacterium leprae, an organism closely related to the tuberculosis bacterium. Unlike tuberculosis, leprosy is difficult to contract and is rarely fatal. The exact mechanisms for the communication of leprosy are still unknown, though it is believed that while bacteria can be discharged through leprous ulcers, the principal mode of transmission is by coughing and sneezing. Contrary to popular belief, leprosy is neither sexually transmitted nor is it inherited. Although they can infiltrate every part of the body, leprosy bacteria concentrate in the skin and peripheral nerves, resulting in the dramatic dermatological effects of the disease. The primary symptoms of leprosy — paralysis, inflammation and loss of feeling — are the result of nerve damage caused by the body’s immune response to bacterial invasion. Though rare in Europe, leprosy is still prevalent in India and Africa, and there are currently over one million cases in India. Leprosy is now curable with multi-drug therapy, which involves the use of various combinations of anti-bacterial drugs and anti-inflammatory drugs which can reduce nerve damage and thus prevent the paralysis and anaesthesia which usually follow.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Michel Foucault, Madness and Civilization: a History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, New York, 1988, p. 3.
John Iliffe, The African Poor: a History, Cambridge, 1987, pp. 214, 219.
Megan Vaughan, Curing Their Ills: Colonial Power and African Illness, Cambridge, 1991, p. 77.
Wellesley C. Bailley, A Glimpse at the Indian Mission Field and Leper Asylums in 1886–87, London, 1890, p. 24.
W.R. Rice, ‘Measures suggested in regard to the treatment of lepers’, 16 August 1893, in Papers Relating to the Treatment of Leprosy in India from 1887–1895, [SRGI, Home, No. CCCXXXI], Calcutta, 1896 (Hereafter, Papers) p. 301.
Radhika Ramasubban, ‘Imperial Health in British India, 1857–1900’, in Roy MacLeod and Milton Lewis (eds), Disease, Medicine and Empire: Perspectives on Western Medicine and the Experience of European Expansion, London, 1988, pp. 38–60.
M. Harrison, Public Health in British India: Anglo-Indian Preventive Medicine, 1859–1914, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, pp. 2–3;
David Arnold, ‘Crisis and Contradiction in India’s Public Health’, in Dorothy Porter (ed.), The History of Public Health and the Modern State, Amsterdam-Atlanta, 1994, p. 353.
Roy MacLeod, ‘On Visiting the “Moving Metropolis” Reflections on the Architecture of Imperial Science’, Hist Recds of Aust Sci, 5, 3 (1982) p. 2.
Michael Ignatieff, Review of Michel Perot (ed.), L’Impossible Prison: Recherches sur le systeme penitentiaire au XIXe siecle, Paris, 1980, in Social History, 7, 2 (1982) pp. 228–9, cited in Anand A. Yang, Crime and Criminality in British India, Tucson, 1985, pp. 4–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Jane Buckingham
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buckingham, J. (2002). Introduction. In: Leprosy in Colonial South India. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932730_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932730_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42530-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3273-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)