Skip to main content
  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

Among Burke’s earliest critics were some of his closest associates. He sent a draft of the early part of Reflections on the Revolution in France to fellow-MP Philip Francis for comment. Francis was shocked, and asked Burke whether he really thought it was worthy of a Privy Councillor ‘to enter into a war of Pamphlets with Dr Price?’ Burke ought, Francis suggested, to adopt a grave, direct and serious tone: ‘In a case so interesting as the errors of a great nation, and the calamities of great individuals, and feeling them so deeply as you profess to do, all manner of insinuation is improper, all jibe and nickname prohibited.’ As for the portrayal of Marie Antoinette, Francis considers it ‘pure foppery’. As he explains: ‘If she be a perfect female character, you ought to take your ground upon her virtues. If she be the reverse it is ridiculous in any but a lover to place her personal charms in opposition to her crimes.’1 In the course of this correspondence, Francis contrasts the humane achievements of the Enlightenment with those priests, bishops and cardinals ‘which laid waste a province and founded a monastery’. Reminding Burke of the less chivalrous aspects of the ancien régime, Francis adds: ‘When the provinces are scourged to the bone by a mercenary and merciless military power, and every drop of its blood and substance extorted from it by the edicts of a royal council, the case seems very tolerable to those who are not involved in it.’2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 19 February 1790 Francis to Burke in Correspondence of Edmund Burke, ed. T.W. Copeland and others, 10 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1958–78), VI, 86–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 3 November 1790, Francis to Burke in Conor Cruise O’Brien, The Great Melody: a Thematic Biography and Commented Anthology of Edmund Burke (Sinclair-Stevenson, 1992), 408.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Correspondence VI, 171. For evidence that Lansdowne as much as France was the target of Burke’s venom see Derek Jarrett, The Begettors of Revolution: England’s Involvement with France, 1759–1789 (Longman, 1973), 281–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Observations on the Reflections of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke, on the Revolution in France. In a Letter to the Earl of Stanhope (Dilly, 1791) in AR (Dec. 1790) 419. In 1770, when still plain Catharine Macaulay (before her second marriage) she had challenged Burke’s Thoughts on the Causes of the Present Discontents. See Ch. 13 below and Bridget Hill, The Republican Virago: the Life and Times of Catharine Macaulay, Historian (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), 74–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Men, in a Letter to the Right Honourable Edmund Burke (Johnson, 1790) in AR VIII (Dec. 1790), 419. Wollstonecraft’s advertisement had explained: ‘Mr Burke’s Reflections on the French Revolution first engaged my attention as the transient topic of the day; and reading it more for amusement than information, my indignation was roused by the sophistical arguments, that every moment crossed me, in the questionable shape of natural feelings and common sense.’ See William Godwin, Memoirs of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. with preface, supplement and bibliographical note by W. Clark Durant (London: Constable; New York: Greenberg; 1927), 196–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. James Mackintosh, Vindiciae Gallicae. Defence of the French Revolution and its English Admirers against the Accusations of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke, including some Strictures on the late Production of M. Calonne (Robinsons, 1791) in Debate on the French Revolution, ed. Alfred Cobban (Black, 1960), 92–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Stuart Andrews

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrews, S. (2000). Burke Rebutted. In: The British Periodical Press and the French Revolution, 1789–99. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932716_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932716_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40910-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3271-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics