Abstract
The love poetry of William Fowler (1560–1612) closes this book’s exploration of Jacobean erotic poetics for several reasons. His amatory corpus contains the only example1 of a substantial sonnet sequence written within the Scottish Jacobean period. This is a more ‘monumental’ lyric exploration of desire than has been considered so far. In differing ways, the erotic writing of Stewart and Montgomerie engaged with the Jamesian project of eros, but Fowler’s poetry, in its dark investigation of sacred and profane desires, is in precise negotiation with the king’s vision of an ideal Protestant poetics. There, a duplicitous and corrupt eros is shunned, ‘that insolent archer quyte’,2 and the moral and philosophical vision of the Du Bartesian epic emulated instead. Fowler’s unpublished sequence, The Tarantula of Love, and a shorter sequence, ‘Of De[a]th’, can be conceived to re-imagine desire in accordance with the sanctioned vision of Jacobean eros.3 Fowler’s writing does not portray an intimately dialogic relationship with James, as do Stewart’s and Montgomerie’s in varying degrees of anxiety and dissent. Fowler is associated in his later career with Anna’s, rather than James’s, court. In 1589, he was appointed Master of Requests and ‘Secret-depute’ to Anna, a position retained until 1608 when Fowler’s position as the Queen’s Secretary (a post in which John Donne showed interest) could no longer be sustained.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
‘The Vranie translated’ (25–9), in Essayes of a Prentise (Edinburgh, 1584), sig. Dijr, W.A. Craigie ed., The Poems of James VI of Scotland, 2 vols (Edinburgh and London: Blackwood, 1955), vol. 1, 19.
For an account of Fowler’s cultural role in relation to Anna, see Clare McManus, ‘Marriage and the Performance of the Romance Quest: Anne of Denmark and the Stirling Baptismal Celebrations for Prince Henry’, in L.A.J.R. Houven, A.A. MacDonald, and S. Mapstone eds, A Palace in the Wild. Essays on vernacular culture and humanism in late-medieval and Renaissance Scotland (Leuven: Peeters, 2000), 177–98 (185–6).
To my Lady Arbella. Extempore’, Hawthornden MS 2063, f. 247r, STS vol. 1, 262 (3–4). In the topographical poem to Arbella on f. 58r, ‘To the true, Ho:ble, most vertuous, and onlie/deseruing La: of Highest titles: The La: Arbella/Steward: vppon my passage downe the Thames to/London: Ianuarie the: 8: 1603’, Fowler alludes to her as ‘next to our kinge as next by bloud and name’ (20), perhaps a politically sensitive comment, given James’s desire to arrange a marriage between Arbella and Ludovic Stuart, Earl of Lennox (see Jamie Reid-Baxter, ‘Politics, Passion and Poetry in the Circle of James VI: John Burel and His Surviving Works’, in Mapstone ed., 199–248 (211–12)). Other lyrics to Arbella from Fowler include Hawthornden MS 2063, f. 68r, STS 319, ‘To my onely L. Arb.’. The untitled sonnet, ‘Once wandringe forth in Maye’, found in the collection of poems in NLS MS 2065, ff. 16r-35r (Fowler’s authorship of which is contested) on f. 25r, provides implicit evidence for Fowler’s authorship: the visionary beloved whose ‘name begins and endeth with an A’ is probably the ubiquitous Arbella. Recent commentators also cite Fowler’s ‘bad’ poetry among the many dedicatory and praise poems she received (Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, Writing Women in Jacobean England [Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993 ], 81).
R.D.S. Jack observes that Fowler’s ‘whole output is modelled on the Rime’ (The Italian Influence on Scottish Literature [Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1972], 82). Though other vernacular Italian sources can also be traced in his writing (see Janet C. Smith, Les Sonnets elisabéthains [Paris, 1929], and Jack), Petrarch constitutes a central underlying model of philosophical and theological ‘authority’ for Fowler’s amatory writing. For a critical survey of Fowler’s work, see John Purves’s excellent survey, ‘Fowler and Scoto-Italian Cultural Relations in the Sixteenth Century’, STS vol. 3, lxxx-cl; Jack, ‘William Fowler and Italian Literature’, MLR, 65 (1970), 481–92;
Jack, Scottish Literature’s Debt to Italy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1986), 9–13;
Jack, ‘Poetry under King James VI’, in Cairns Craig ed., History of Scottish Literature, 4 vols (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1988), vol. 1 ed. R.D.S. Jack, 125–39 (129).
Canzone 366 (7–8): ‘who has always replied/to whoever called on her with faith’ (Robert M. Durling trans. and ed., Petrarch’s Lyric Poems: The Rime sparse and Other Lyrics (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1976), 574).
See Giuzeppe Mazzotta, ‘The Canzionere and the Language of the Self’, Studies in Philology, 75 (1978), 271–96 (272).
Nesca A. Robb, Neoplatonism of the Italian Renaissance (London, 1935), 210.
See William J. Kennedy, Authorising Petrarch (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Sarah M. Dunnigan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dunnigan, S.M. (2002). Heretical Love-Words: The Poetry of William Fowler. In: Eros and Poetry at the Courts of Mary Queen of Scots and James VI. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932709_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403932709_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42369-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3270-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)