Abstract
Britain’s failure to gain entry into the EEC gave some relief to worried farmers in Australasia. But the long-term commercial prospects for New Zealand and Australia continued to be shrouded in uncertainty. It was widely expected that Britain would renew its attempt to join the Common Market. In the meantime, it was possible that it would adopt a restrictive, European-style agricultural policy, offer agricultural concessions to EFTA, and exploit BP margins to the full. Consequently, New Zealand and Australia could not afford to relax the search for alternative Outlets
Australian TV interviewer: Do you think there is any possibility that there may be complacency in Australia now that Britain is not going in [to the EEC]. We may feel that there is no need to seek further markets. Do you think there is any danger of that?
John McEwen, Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Trade: No, I don’t think there is danger that this development should produce complacency … we go on discussing our trade relationship with the United Kingdom and go on searching the world … [for] trading opportunities.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2002 John Singleton and Paul L. Robertson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singleton, J., Robertson, P.L. (2002). After the Veto: Trade Policy in the Mid-1960s. In: Economic Relations Between Britain and Australasia 1945–1970. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919731_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919731_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42401-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1973-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)