Abstract
In the final autumn of Zhou Enlai’s life, as he fought a losing battle with cancer, he was troubled by a matter that had been resolved with Mao’s approval several times over – in 1932, 1968 and 1972. Yet the thought preyed on his mind that posterity might doubt his loyalty to the party, might believe that in 1932, under the alias Wu Hao, he had published a newspaper declaration that he was quitting the party. He requested that his account and all the accompanying materials that proved the GMD’s fabrication of the announcement be brought to his hospital bed. In September 1975 he once again signed his name to the documents, which were then returned to the party archives. Here was a man whose every moment for more than fifty years had been dedicated for better or worse to the Chinese Communist Party, a man who had been involved in every dramatic twist and turn the party had taken, a man who had stood at Mao’s side and at the side of those leaders who had preceded Mao. One of the giants of the communist revolution, he had personally negotiated with the friends and enemies of the CCP and the PRC. He was revered and loved by his people – and yet his last thoughts were disturbed by an episode that might appear to us as marginal, if not trivial.
In North China there are many good communists like Peng Zhen and Bo Yibo. They were locked up in prison. Do you think that only we outside fought hard? Did they not fight hard? They struggled against the enemy from within the prison.… Amongst our white area cadres are those who survived without having been in prison; those who survived imprisonment … those in prison who died there. They all struggled bravely and were ready to sacrifice their lives.… Their achievements count. We must appreciate the work they did.
(Mao Zedong speaking at the Central Party School, 15 February 1945)2
Our revolutionary martyrs are like towering peaks that rise into the clouds, while this handful of traitors are nothing more than earth mounds. The Khrushchev of China and the handful of traitors under his protective wings are unable to wash away their disgrace with all the waters of the East China Sea. The verdict of history is that you will leave an infamous memory to posterity.
(Hongqi, 17 August 1967)2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Pamela Lubell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lubell, P. (2002). A Prejudiced Conclusion. In: The Chinese Communist Party and the Cultural Revolution. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919649_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919649_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42403-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1964-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)