Skip to main content
  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

Stalin’s postwar system marked the Soviet Union’s passage from the convulsion and disorder of revolution to the routinized professionalization common to most industrial societies. In the late Stalin years the career paths offering status and security became more clearly delineated, and for industrial supervisors, their families, and even their employees, life became more predictable. The stability and emerging normalcy of the era were new and welcomed phenomena in Soviet history. Unlike the situation in the 1930s, radical change and social upheaval were not part of the late Stalinist landscape. In the Introduction I asked if something about the postwar experience might have helped build popular acceptance or tolerance for Stalin’s regime. This study of elite formation indicates that the job security and enhanced status enjoyed by postwar technicians and engineers may well have inclined the technical intelligentsia to develop a fondness for Stalinism, at least in its postwar manifestation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This observation has been documented by Jerry F. Hough in The Soviet Prefects: The Local Party Organs in Industrial Decision-making (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969), pp. 40–43.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. N. S. Khrushchev, Khrushchev Remembers, trans. Strobe Talbott (Boston: Little, Brown, 1970), p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Lars T. Lih, Oleg V. Naumov, and Oleg V. Khlevniuk, eds., Stalin’s Letters to Molotov (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), pp. 224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yoram Gorlizki, “Party Revivalism and the Death of Stalin”, Slavic Review 54, no. 1 (Spring 1995), p. 11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amy Knight, Beria: Stalin’ s First Lieutenant (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Milovan Djilas, Conversations with Stalin, trans. Michael B. Petrovich (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1962), pp. 151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khrushchev, Khrushchev Remembers, p. 299. Khrushchev’s comment about the war is quoted in Robert Conquest, Stalin: Breaker of Nations (New York: Praeger, 1976), p. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vladislav Zubok and Constantine Pleshakov, Inside the Kremlin’s Cold War (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996), pp. 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander Werth, Russia: The Post-War Years (New York: Taplinger, 1971), p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elena Zubkova, Russia After the War: Hopes, Illusions, and Disappointments, 1945–1957 (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Important works highlighting Stalinism’s multifaceted nature include Giuseppe Boffa, The Stalin Phenomenon (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alec Nove, ed., The Stalin Phenomenon (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robert C. Tucker, ed., Stalinism: Essays in Historical Interpretation (New York: Norton, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seweryn Bialer, Stalin’s Successors: Leadership, Stability, and Change in the Soviet Union (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a study of Party schools, see Michael David-Fox, Revolution of the Mind: Higher Learning among the Bolsheviks, 1918–1929 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nicholas DeWitt, Education and Professional Employment in the USSR (Washington: National Science Foundation, 1961), p. 534.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moshe Lewin, Stalinism and the Seeds of Soviet Reform: The Debates of the 1960s (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1974), p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stephen Whitefield, Industrial Power and the Soviet State (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 J. Eric Duskin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duskin, J.E. (2001). The Implications of Stalin’s Technocracy. In: Stalinist Reconstruction and the Confirmation of a New Elite, 1945–1953. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919458_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919458_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42392-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1945-8

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics