Abstract
On 11 June 1569, a visitor with a memorable exhibition held court over the Durham citizenry:
A certaine Italian brought into the Cittie … a very greate strange & monstrous serpent in length sixxteene feete in quantitie & dimensions greater than a greate horse which was taken & killed by special pollicie in Aethiopia within the Turke’s dominions. But before it was killed, it had devoured (as it is credibly thought) more than 1000 persons And Allso destroyed a Whole Countrey.l
At once here it is the confused state of national boundaries that receives attention. An Italian has access to a region of the sub-Saharan continent, which itself is under Turkish control. Adding to the uncertainty is the vagueness surrounding ‘a Whole Countrey’, a fourth geographical entity which lacks a precise anchorage. Overshadowing territorial conjurations, however, is the emphasis on the preternaturally destructive capacities of the ‘serpent’. From the point of view of a theatrical performance, an elaboration of the powers and provenance of the ‘serpent’ was no doubt the centrepiece of the presenter’s ‘spiel’. A relative of the travelling mountebank, the Italian, the passage suggests, framed his description within the parameters of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century travellers’ tales, mapping a history of deliverance and conquest to extol the winning virtues of a ‘monstrous’ attraction.’ In fact, in its representation of the ‘extraordinary body’ of the ‘serpent’, the report stands as a quasi-colonial narrative, a drama in which militaristic stratagems and annihilatory appetites loom large as the distinguishing features.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Peter Heylyn, Microcosmus (London, 1621; S.T.C. 13276), p. 381;
John Leo, A geographical historie of Africa (London, 1600; S.T.C. 15481), pp. 4, 10.
See Janet Adelman, ‘lago’s Alter Ego: Race as Projection in Othello’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 48 (1997), pp. 125–44;
Emily C. Bartels, ’Othello and Africa: Postcolonialism Reconsidered’, The William and Mary Quarterly, 54 (1997), pp. 45–64;
Dympna Callaghan, Shakespeare without Women: Representing Gender and Race on the Renaissance Stage (London and New York: Routledge, 2000), pp. 75–96;
John Gillies, Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 25;
Andrew Hadfield, Literature, Travel, and Colonial Writing in the English Renaissance, 1545–1625 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1998), pp. 226–32;
Ian Smith, ‘Barbarian Errors: Performing Race in Early Modern England’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 49 (1998), pp. 168–86.
James R. Aubrey, ‘Race and the Spectacle of the Monstrous in Othello’, Clio, 22 (1993), p. 221;
Karen Newman, Fashioning Femininity and English Renaissance Drama (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp. 71–93;
Patricia Parker, Shakespeare from the Margins: Language, Culture, Context (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1996), pp. 229–72.
Eric C. Brown, ‘ “Many a Civil Monster”: Shakespeare’s Idea of the Centaur’, Shakespeare Survey, 51 (1998), p. 187.
Arthur L. Little, Shakespeare’s Jungle Fever: National-Imperial Re-visions of Race, Rape, and Sacrifice (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000), p. 86.
Ethel Carleton Williams, Anne of Denmark (Chatham: Mackay, 1970), p. 21.
John Nichols, ed., The Progresses and Public Processions of Queen Elizabeth, 3 vols (London: J. Nichols, 1823), III, p. 516.
Jack D’Amico, The Moor in English Renaissance Drama (Tampa: University of South Florida Press, 1991), p. 36.
Edmund Spenser, The Faerie Queene, ed. A. C. Hamilton (London and New York: Longman, 1977), Book I, canto i, stanza 13, p. 33; canto i, stanza 14, p. 34.
On the escape from Barbary, see Nabil Matar, ‘English Accounts of Captivity in North Africa and the Middle East: 1577–1625’, Renaissance Quarterly, 54 (2001), pp. 553–72;
G. A. Starr, ‘Escape from Barbary: A Seventeenth-Century Genre’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 29 (1965), pp. 35–62.
William Cuningham, The cosmographical glasse (London, 1559; S.T.C. 6119), p. 186;
Samuel Purchas, Purchas his pilgrimage (London, 1613; S.T.C. 20505), p. 468.
For a contemporary dramatic treatment dismissing the ‘monstrous’ races, see Thomas Dekker, Henry Chettle and William Haughton, Patient Grissil (1599), in Thomas Dekker, The Dramatic Works, ed. Fredson Bowers, 4 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953–61), I, V.i.14–56.
J. Hillis Miller, ‘Narrative’, in Frank Lentricchia and Thomas McLaughlin, eds, Critical Terms for Literary Study (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1990), p. 72.
Patricia Parker, Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property (London: Methuen, 1987), p. 95.
Hillel Schwartz, The Culture of the Copy: Striking Likenesses, Unreasonable Facsimiles (New York: Zone, 1996), pp. 27, 41, 47, 89.
See Gordon Williams, A Dictionary of Sexual Language and Imagery in Shakespearean and Stuart Literature, 3 vols (London: Athlone, 1994), II, pp. 642–4, 1059–60; III, pp. 1168–9.
Kim F. Hall, ‘“Troubling Doubles”: Apes, Africans and Blackface in Mr. Moore’s Revels’, in Joyce Green MacDonald, ed., Race, Ethnicity and Power in the Renaissance (Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1997), p. 125.
Edward Topsell, The historie of foure-footed beastes (London, 1607; S.T.C. 24123), p. 16.
Petrus Martyr Anglerius, The decades of the newe worlde or west India (London, 1555; S.T.C. 645), fos 16‘, 37“, 125”, 159’, 181’; Purchas, Purchas his pilgrimage, pp. 513, 580, 629, 647, 703, 738; Jan Huygen van Linschoten, John Huighen Van Linschoten (London, 1597; S.T.C. 15691), p. 200.
Joseph A. Porter, ‘Complement Extern: Iago’s Speech Acts’, in Virginia Mason Vaughan and Kent Cartwright, eds, ’Othello’: New Perspectives (Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1991), p. 88.
Virginia Mason Vaughan, ’Othello’: A Contextual History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 29.
Katharine Eisaman Maus, Inwardness and Theatre in the English Renaissance (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1995), pp. 104, 115.
Peter G. Platt, Reason Diminished: Shakespeare and the Marvellous (Lincoln, NB and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1997), p. 36.
See also James Biester, Lyric Wonder: Rhetoric and Wit in Renaissance English Poetry (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1997), p. 131.
See Anthony Quinton, Francis Bacon (New York: Hing and Wang, 1980), p. 79;
Paulo L. Rossi, ‘Science, culture and the dissemination of learning’, in Stephen Pumfrey, Paolo L. Rossi and Maurice Slawinski, eds, Science, Culture and Popular Belief in Renaissance Europe (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991), pp. 162–4, 172;
Steven Shapin, The Scientific Revolution (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1996), p. 85.
Francis Bacon, The Advancement of Learning, in The Works, ed. James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis and Douglas Denon Heath, 7 vols (London: Longman, 1857–9), III, pp. 331, 362.
See K. Theodore Hoppen, ‘The Early Royal Society’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 9. 3 (1976), p. 267.
Thomas Birch, The History of the Royal Society of London, 4 vols (London: Millar, 1756–7), I, p. 393, IV, p. 41; ‘Extract of a Letter’, Philosophical Transactions, 3 June, 26 (1667), pp. 479–80;
John F. Fulton, A Bibliography of the Honourable Robert Boyle (Oxford: Clarendon, 1961), p. 139;
Jacomo Grandi, ‘An Extract of an Italian Letter’, Philosophical Transactions, 25 April, 58 (1670), pp. 1188–9;
Neremiah Grew, Mvsaevm regalis societatis (London, 1681; Wing G1952), p. 81;
Henry Oldenburg, The Correspondence, ed. A. Rupert Hall and Marie Boas Hall, 9 vols (Madison and Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin Press, 1955–73), III, 491–97, IV, 78.
Lorraine Daston and Katharine Park, Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750 (New York: Zone Books, 1998), p. 249.
Thomas Sprat, The history of the Royal Society (London, 1667; Wing S5032), p. 35.
Roy Porter, ‘Introduction’, in Pumfrey, Rossi and Slawinski, eds, Science, Culture and Popular Belief p. 6; Jole Shackelford, ‘Seeds with a Mechanical Purpose: Severinus, Semina and Seventeenth-Century Matter Theory’, in Allen G. Debus and Michael T. Walton, eds, Reading the Book of Nature: The Other Side of the Scientific Revolution (Kirksville: Thomas Jefferson University Press, 1998), pp. 15–16;
Perez Zagorin, Francis Bacon (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998), pp. 40–3.
Charles Webster, From Paracelsus to Newton: Magic and the Making of Modern Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), p. 61.
Huston Diehl, Staging Reform, Reforming the Stage: Protestantism and Popular Theatre in Early Modern England (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1997), p. 136.
See, for instance, William Cartwright, The Ordinary (1635), in The Plays and Poems, ed. G. Blakemore Evans (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1951), II.iii.802–18;
John Cleveland, Poems (London, 1653; Wing C4689), p. 37; Antonio de Torquemada, The Spanish Mandevile of miracles (London, 1600; S.T.C. 24135), fo. 10; William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice (1596–7), ed. Jay L. Halio (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), I.iii.74–85.
Annette Drew-Bear, Painted Faces on the Renaissance Stage: The Moral Significance of Face-Painting Conventions (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1994), p. 23; Callaghan, Shakespeare without Women, p. 79.
Edward Pechter, ’Othello’ and Interpretive Traditions (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1999), p. 31.
David Robson, ‘Frye, Derrida, Pynchon, and the Apocalyptic Space of Postmodern Fiction’, in Richard Dellamora, ed., Postmodern Apocalypse: Theory and Cultural Practice at the End (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1995), p. 63.
Elizabeth Hanson, Discovering the Subject in Renaissance England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 84.
Michael Neill, ‘Unproper Beds: Race, Adultery and the Hideous in Othello’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 40 (1989), p. 394.
William Shakespeare, A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare: ‘Othello’, ed. Horace Howard Furness (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1886), p. 399.
Copyright information
© 2002 Mark Thornton Burnett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burnett, M.T. (2002). ‘As it is credibly thought’: Conceiving ‘Monsters’ in Othello. In: Constructing ‘Monsters’ in Shakespearean Drama and Early Modern Culture. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919359_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919359_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42294-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1935-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)