Abstract
Effective and efficient dispute settlement (DS) is fundamental to the international trading system. While trade negotiators may seek to achieve clear and fair rules with a broad degree of consensus and commitment, a DS system is needed to ensure that commitments are honored. In the early days of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), differences were addressed through bilateral consultations. However, this approach proved inadequate over the years, and in the 1970s and 1980s an increasing number of cases were brought before GATT panels. But many countries did not even bother to contest cases given the delays, different procedures for different issues, and particularly the ability of the defending country to block panel findings. The new rules needed to be more clearly enforceable so that the time invested in developing new rules in the Uruguay Round (UR) would not be wasted by a weak DS system. Most observers hailed the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) new DS rules as a major achievement of the UR. For smaller economies, which had made little use of the GATT DS system, the changes seemed particularly significant. One question to be addressed in this chapter is to what extent the new WTO DS system has lived up to such expectations, and especially in the eyes of the Amerièas. Parallel to the multilateral process, several regional trading arrangements have been signed since the late 1980s, each with its own system for dealing with disputes. With the proliferation of regional mechanisms, the other question for this chapter is what are their relative strengths and weaknesses and what does experience with their use imply. If there is to be free trade within the hemisphere, what would be the most appropriate approach to DS?
Keywords
- World Trade Organization
- Dispute Settlement
- North American Free Trade Agreement
- Uruguay Round
- Trade Negotiation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weston, A., Delich, V. (2003). Settling Disputes. In: Tussie, D. (eds) Trade Negotiations in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918581_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918581_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43128-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1858-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)