Abstract
By way of conclusion, let me review the different stages of the argument presented in the last five chapters. In Chapter 1 I laid out what I take to be a liberal conception of political justification in terms of the inclusiveness of the constituency of justification, and the permanence of deep diversity in that constituency. Once we understand justificatory reasons as practical reasons, as I claimed that we must, then questions about the motivational adequacy of these reasons arise. If justificatory reasons are supposed to be action-guiding then we have to ask two questions about them. (1) Is action for these reasons possible? The answer to this question is no if such action would require that members of the constituency of justification have contradictory beliefs or inconsistent motives. (2) How demanding are these justificatory reasons? The demandingness of a set of reasons is a function not of the formal possibility of action guided by them, but rather of the degree of uniformity along various dimensions required across a constituency of persons in order for them all to have the motivational commitment to act for these reasons
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Catriona McKinnon
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKinnon, C. (2002). Concluding Review. In: Liberalism and the Defence of Political Constructivism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918512_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918512_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42822-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1851-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)