Abstract
One of the strongest arguments against the use of economic sanctions is that often ordinary people in the target state — rather than the political elite — are most hurt. This unintended effect may be counterproductive, especially if sanctions begin to lose popular support within the target state as a result of job losses and deepening poverty. It is important to keep in mind, therefore, that in the South African case, the call for isolation was part of the overall political strategy of the internal black opposition.
As the sanctions campaign gains momentum internationally, it is important never to lose sight of the fact that the initial call for the isolation of South Africa came from inside South Africa itself.
South African Congress of Trade Unions, c. 19832
[W]e do not conceive of sanctions as a substitute for our struggle and our sacrifices; it is additional. So we will continue, we will certainly embark on massive strike actions, we will do all the things that we can and must do for our own freedom, but sanctions are additional and sanctions alone would not bring about any results.
Oliver Tambo, President of the African National Congress, October 19853
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cited in J. Hanlon and R. Omond, The Sanctions Handbook: For or Against? (Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1987), p. 92.
T. Lodge, “Sanctions and Black Political Organizations,” in M. Orkin, ed., Sanctions Against Apartheid (Cape Town: David Philip, 1989).
W. G. James, Our Precious Metal: African Labour in South Africa’s Gold Industry, 1970–1990 (Cape Town: David Philip, 1992), p. 63.
R. Knight, “Sanctions, Disinvestment, and US Corporations in South Africa,” in R. E. Edgar, ed., Sanctioning Apartheid (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 1990), p. 74.
R. Lambert and E. Webster, “The Re-emergence of Political-Unionism in Contemporary South Africa,” in W. Cobbett and R. Cohen, eds., Popular Struggles in South Africa (London: James Currey, 1988);
A. Fine and E. Webster, “Transcending Traditions: Trade Unions and Political Unity,” South African Review 5 (Johannesburg: Raven Press, 1989), pp. 256–74.
L. Schlemmer, “The Sanctions Survey: In Search of Ordinary Black Opinion,” Indicator SA 4 (1986);
L. Schlemmer, “Disinvestment and Black Worker Attitudes in South Africa,” Review of African Political Economy 38 (1987).
J. Baskin, Striking Back: A History of COSATU (London: Verso, 1991), pp. 155–7.
J. Matiko, “Samcor — Workers Strike against Share Ownership,” South African Labour Bulletin 13 (1988).
R. Rafel, “Chemical Workers — the Struggle over Disinvestment,” South African Labour Bulletin 14 (1989).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maloka, T. (1999). “Sanctions Hurt but Apartheid Kills!”: The Sanctions Campaign and Black Workers. In: Crawford, N.C., Klotz, A. (eds) How Sanctions Work. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403915917_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403915917_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-72552-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1591-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)