Abstract
Until 1983, the indexation of wages to past prices, which, with the exception of the minimum wage, the SMIG,1 had actually been forbidden by law in 1958, was, nevertheless, common practice in France. It had even been enshrined in a number of collective agreements, including those covering the metal and rubber-processing industries,2 which meant that wage indexation was applied to all employment contracts in firms covered by such agreements. This aspect of the management of the wage–labour nexus shows, first, that customs are sometimes much stronger than rules, even those emanating from the state, and, secondly, that a rule has no meaning until it is put into effect, a point to which we will return later in the book. In launching a campaign to enforce the prohibition of wage indexation, the socialist government of Pierre Mauroy was challenging one of the fundamental elements of the Fordist wage regime, namely the continuous increase in wages relative to the cost of living (Benassy et al., 1977; Boyer, 1978).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Bénédicte Reynaud
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reynaud, B. (2002). Wage Disindexation in France and the Incompleteness of the Employment Contract. In: Operating Rules in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403914422_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403914422_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41328-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1442-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)