Abstract
The Korean war was an important watershed in Anglo-American relations. It marked the point where the Cold War developed into a ‘hot’ war, if one that was restricted to one part of East Asia.1 In the course of the conflict the United States accepted full responsibility for containing communism, a development sought by Great Britain since 1946: Britain thought primarily in terms of an American commitment to defend Europe against the Soviet Union rather than American action in Asia; thus when the Korean War began in 1950 the possibility of the United States focusing more heavily on Asia rather than Europe could be discerned. In June–July 1950 President Harry Truman and Secretary of State Dean Acheson were most anxious to secure a British commitment in Korea.2 American policy moved swiftly and successfully to seize the initiative in the United Nations (UN) following the initial North Korean advance towards South Korea, a development facilitated by the continued absence of the Soviet Union from the UN Security Council.3 UN condemnation of North Korea and approval of military action necessitated the participation of as many states as possible, so as to obviate the perception that the UN was a convenient facade for American policy. Clearly Britain had declined as a power but Britain was still significant in a way that had ceased to obtain by the time the Korean war ended in July 1953.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
David Rees, Korea: The Limited War (London: Macmillan — now Palgrave, 1964).
See Peter Lowe, Containing the Cold War in East Asia: British Policies towards Japan, China and Korea, 1948–53 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997), 190–8.
For the development of the UN and a brief account of its experience during the Korean war, see Evan Luard, A History of the United Nations, vol. I: The Years of Western Domination (London: Macmillan — now Palgrave, 1982).
The most thorough study of Bevin is Alan Bullock, The Life and Times of Ernest Bevin, vol. Ill Foreign Secretary, 1945–1951 (London: Heinemann, 1983).
For a broader perspective, see John Young, Winston Churchill’s Last Campaign: Britain and the Cold War, 1951–1955 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
For an examination of Eisenhower’s approach to international and domestic issues, see Stephen Ambrose, Eisenhower: the President (London: Simon and Schuster, 1984).
S.N. Goncharov, J.W Lewis and Xue Litai, Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao and the Korean War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994);
J.G. Hershberg (ed), The Cold War International History Project Bulletin, Issues 6–7, The Cold War in Asia (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center, 1996);
Kathryn Weathersby, Soviet Aims in Korea and the Origins of the Korean War, 1945–1950: New Evidence from the Russian Archives (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars, 1993).
Goncharov, Lewis and Xue Litai, 40. For a thorough assessment of the British military contribution, see Anthony Farrar-Hockley, The British Part in the Korean War, 2 vols (London: HMSO, 1990–5).
For a most lively, penetrating examination of Korea, see Bruce Cumings, Korea’s Place in the Sun: a Modern History (London: Norton, 1997).
On MacArthur, see D. Clayton James, The Years of MacArthur vol III Triumph and Disaster, 1945–1964 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1985)
Michael Schaller, Douglas MacArthur: The Far Eastern General (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).
See Peter Lowe, ‘The Frustrations of Alliance: Britain, the United States and the Korean War, 1950–1951’, in James Cotton and Ian Neary (eds), The Korean War in History (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989), 85.
Zhai Qiang, The Dragon, the Lion and the Eagle: Chinese-British-American Relations, 1949–1958 (London: Kent State University Press, 1994);
Zhang Shu Guang, Mao’s Military Romanticism: China and the Korean War, 1950–1953 (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1995).
See Lowe, The Origins of the Korean War, 2nd ed (London: Longman, 1997), 215–16.
For a thorough account of the armistice discussions, see Rosemary Foot, A Substitute for Victory: The Politics of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks (London: Cornell University Press, 1990).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lowe, P. (2002). Waging Limited Conflict: The Impact of the Korean War on Anglo-American Relations, 1950–1953. In: Carter, D., Clifton, R. (eds) War and Cold War in American Foreign Policy 1942–62. Cold War History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403913852_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403913852_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42399-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1385-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)