Abstract
What is the meaning of ‘participation’ within the popular notion of ‘participatory natural resource management’? An interesting entry point into this debate is Oakley and Marsden’s (1984) review of discourses and practices, in which they suggest four broad understandings: (1) informing and mobilising target groups; (2) community development; (3) organising target groups; and (4) empowering beneficiaries. They clearly favoured the last two, and criticised the first two for the underlying assumption of ‘so-called “communities” which operate in the “national” interest and which assume that everyone is, or should be, pulling in the same direction’. Instead, they suggest that it is necessary ‘to identify particular groups with conflicting interests…[showing that] different interest groups struggle for control of available assets and resources’ (1984: 9). Underprivileged groups were thus to be organised and empowered — through development projects — by outside organisations such as NGOs or specialised government agencies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geiser, U. (2001). To ‘Participate’ with Whom, for What (and against Whom): Forest Fringe Management along the Western Ghats in Southern Kerala. In: Vira, B., Jeffery, R. (eds) Analytical Issues in Participatory Natural Resource Management. Global Issues Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403907677_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403907677_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41942-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-0767-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)