Abstract
This chapter examines the bewildering state of the latter half of the twentieth century and illustrates the need for a reliable theoretical framework through which we may interpret global change. Although ridiculed by critics wearing the broad mantle of the ‘progressive left’, incorporating critical theory, postmodernism, post-structuralism and the like (that is, virtually every other contribution to this book), it is argued that realism — especially the classical realism of Carr, Morgenthau and Niebuhr but also the structural or neo-realism of Waltz and Krasner — is best suited to understand the turbulent world in which we live. At all times the interface between theory and practice is exposed.
The views expressed in this chapter are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer, ACCORD.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aronowitz, S. (1992), ‘The Tension of Critical Theory: Is Negative Dialectics All There Is?’, in S. Seidman and D. G. Wagner (eds), Postmodernism and Social Theory (Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell): 289–321.
Bendana, A. (1994), ‘A New Global Order’, paper presented to the ‘Conference on Global Change–Imperatives for the South’ organized by the Southern African Non-Governmental Development Organization Network (SANDON); Centre for Southern African Studies; Centro de Estudios Internacionales, Managua, Nicaragua; and the Foundation for Contemporary Research, Protea Hotel, Brackenfell (23–25 February).
Booth, Ken (1991a), Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice (Aberystwyth: University College of Wales).
Booth, Ken (1991b), ‘Security and Emancipation’, Review of International Studies 17, 313–26.
Booth, Ken (1994), ‘A Security Regime in Southern Africa: Theoretical Considerations’, Southern African Perspectives: A Working Paper Series 30 (Bellville: Centre for Southern African Studies).
Booth, Ken, and Peter Vale (1995), ‘Security in Southern Africa: after apartheid, beyond realism’, International Affairs Bulletin 71 /2.
Boutros-Ghali, Boutros (1992), An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy
Boyle, F. A. (1985), World Politics and International Law (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
Bull, Hedley (1977), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan).
Buzan, Barry (1987), An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military Technology and International Relations (London: Macmillan Press in association with the International Institute for Strategic Studies).
Campbell, David (1990), ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’, Alternatives 15, 263–86.
Carim, Xavier (1995), Critical and Postmodern Readings of Strategic Culture in the 1990s, paper presented to the conference on ‘A Culture of Peace in Commemoration of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jnr’ organized by the Department of Political and Administrative Studies, University of Zimbabwe in cooperation with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Harare, Zimbabwe (13–17 February).
Carr, E. H. (1966), The Twenty Years Crisis 1919–1939. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 3rd edn (London: Macmillan).
Chan, Stephen (1987), Issues in International Relations: A view from Africa (London: Macmillan).
Davenport, T. R. H. (1991), South Africa: A Modern History, 4th edn, (London: Macmillan).
Dawkins, Richard (1976), The Selfish Gene (New York: Oxford University Press).
Economist (1994), ‘Marital problems’ (3 Dec.).
Economist (1994), ‘Norway’s No’ (3 Dec.).
Evans, G. and J. Newnham (1992), The Dictionary of World Politics: A reference guide to concepts, ideas and institutions (New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf).
Far Eastern Economic Review (1994), ‘India: Pride and Prejudice’ (3 Nov.).
Far Eastern Economic Review (1994), ‘Zones of competition’ (22 Dec.).
Far Eastern Economic Review (1994), ‘Enter the Dragon’ (22 Dec.).
Fox, W. T. R. (1985), ‘E H Carr and Political Realism: vision and revision’, Review of International Studies 11, 1–16.
Gaddis, John Lewis (1992), The United States and the End of the Cold War: Implications, Reconsideration, Provocations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
George, Jim (1994), Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical Reintroduction to International Relations (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
George, Jim (1993), ‘Of Incarceration and Closure: Neo-Realism and the New/Old World Order’, Millennium: Journal of International Affairs 22 /2, 197–234.
Hatcher, J.W. (1994), ‘The Problem of Self-interest: from Gene to International Relations’, The Indian Ocean Review (8–11 Dec.).
Kennan, George F. (1984), The Nuclear Delusion: Soviet -American Relations in the Atomic Age (London: Hamish Hamilton).
Manning, R. and P. Stern (1994), ‘The Myth of the Pacific Community’, Foreign Affairs 73/6 (Nov.–Dec.), 79–93.
Mansbridge, J. J. (ed.) (1990), Beyond Self-Interest (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Morgenthau, Hans (1960), Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 3rd edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).
Rodee, C. C., T. J. Anderson and C. Q. Christol (1976), Introduction to Political Science, 3rd edn (New York: McGraw-Hill).
Shaw, R. P. and Y. Wong (1989), Genetic Seeds of Warfare, Evolution, nationalism and patriotism (Boston: Unwin and Hyman).
Solomon, Hussein (1995), ‘Global Change and the Challenge to International Relations Theory’, Politeia 14 /1, 37–54.
Speth, James G. (1992), ‘A post-Rio Compact’, Foreign Policy 88.
Vale, Peter (1994), Of Laagers, Lepers and Leanness: South Africa and Regional Security in the mid-1990s (Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute).
Vincent, R. J. (1986), Human Rights and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Walker, R. B. J. (1990), ‘Security, Sovereignty and the Challenge of World Politics’, Alternatives 15, 3–27.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
Weekly Mail (1995), ‘Ecuador and Peru in Border War’ (10 Feb.).
Wilson, E. O. (1975), Sociobiology: The new synthesis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Palgrave Publishers Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Solomon, H. (2001). Realism and its Critics. In: Vale, P., Swatuk, L.A., Oden, B. (eds) Theory, Change and Southern Africa’s Future. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403901019_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403901019_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42189-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-0101-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)