Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
Dionysian Economics
  • 357 Accesses

Abstract

“Let a hundred flowers bloom.” Chairman Mao’s famous phrase is not a bad characterization of economics during the first half of the twentieth century. The disagreements among economists were fundamental. Some economists thought capitalism worked well enough, even during the Depression of the thirties, on the grounds that the alternatives were even worse. Marxists thought a broad revolution was needed to excise the evils of capitalism and create a thoroughgoing socialist society. Some economists created a model of a planned economy that used the Walrasian theory that defended capitalism but with a new socialist interpretation. Other economists claimed to prove that a planned economy was impossible. Still others thought that economic theory was no more than a collection of “empty boxes” and that good old-fashioned economic history was the only way to do economic research.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On the latter, see J. H. Clapham, “Of Empty Economic Boxes,” Economic Journal, vol. 32, September 1922: 305–14. Frank Knight, in several essays, lies somewhere in between in both methodology and basic ideas. See his 1925 Freedom and Reform; Essays in Economics and Social Philosophy.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Claudio Napoleoni, Economic Thought in the Twentieth Century (New York: Wiley, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  3. and Silvia Nasar, Grand Pursuit (New York: Simon & Shuster, 2011) survey the history of economic thought during this era.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mary S. Morgan, The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012). Her 1991 History of Econometric Ideas predated the above work.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Philip Mirowsky, Machine Dreams (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orrin Pilkey and Linda Pilkey-Jarvis, Useless Arithmetic (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emanuel Derman, My Life as a Quant (New York: Wiley, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel Kahneman, Thinking Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar Strauss & Girous, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diane Coyle, GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Repeated successful prediction increases confirmatory value, but confirmation is never certain. Wikipedia’s long article “Scientifc Method,” is excellent, as is Hugh G. Gauch Jr. Scientific Method in Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Benjamin Ward

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ward, B. (2016). Introduction. In: Dionysian Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137597366_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics