Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Political Economy of East Asia ((TPEEA))

  • 1272 Accesses

Abstract

Wan examines the theories of power and international order, the relationship between global finance and sovereign states and a broader scientific field of biogeography. The AIIB is a power move by a rising great power vis-à-vis the status quo superpower. Wan provides an alternative but unified framework to analyze power. Logically and empirically, power can be both goal and means. He follows a biogeographical approach that emphasizes evolving processes rather than simply action and reaction in a mechanical fashion. Evolution exerts pressure on the content and intensity of power. He also argues that power is both intrinsic and observer-relative. Power is partially a social construction. We should focus on what seems to come ‘natural’ for the players in international relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. P.C. Schmitter (2010) ‘Micro-Foundations for the Sciences of Politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 33 (3), 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. Baldwin (1979) ‘Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies’, World Politics, 31 (2), 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D.A. Baldwin (2002) ‘Power and International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds.) Handbook of International Relations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications), 177–191.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. See, for example, J.S. Nye, Jr. (2011) The Future of Power (New York: Public Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.J. Morgenthau (1973) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th ed. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Among political scientists, James Fearon and Alexander Wendt have provided a good definition, contrasting causal theorizing and constitutive theorizing. ‘Causal theorizing seeks to establish the necessary and sufficient conditions relating a pre-existing cause to a subsequent effect in a more or less mechanistic way. An assumption of such theorizing, therefore, is that cause and effect are independently existing phenomena. Constitutive theorizing, in contrast, seeks to establish conditions of possibility for objects or events by showing what they are made of and how they are organized’. J. Fearon and A. Wendt (2002) ‘Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B.A. Simmons (eds.) Handbook of International Relations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications), p. 58. For a discussion of various political science definitions of constitutive causality, see

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.N. Lebow (2009) ‘Constitutive Causality: Imagined Spaces and Political Practices’, Millennium-journal of International Studies, 38 (2), 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R.J. Huggett (2004) Fundamentals of Biogeography, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge), pp. 187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Mann (2012) The Sources of Social Power, Vol. 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. J.R. Searle (1995) The Construction of Social Reality (New York: Free Press), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The logic applied to the relationship between the Chinese empire and nomadic empires. See O. Lattimore (1960) Inner Asian Frontiers of China (Boston: Beacon Press), pp. 340–349;

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Barfield (1989) The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China (Cambridge: Blackwell);

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Di Cosmo (1999) ‘The Northern Frontier in Pre-Imperial China’, in M. Loewe and E.L. Shaughnessy (eds.) The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 960–966.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.O. Keohane (1986) ‘Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond’, in R.O. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.N. Waltz (1979) Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley), p. 77

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.A. Coyne (2009) Why Evolution Is True (New York: Viking), p. 127

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Wendt (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. J.R. Searle (1995) The Construction of Social Reality (New York: Free Press), pp. xi–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.O. Keohane (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Axelrod (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.O. Keohane (1982) ‘The Demand for International Regimes’, International Organization, 36 (2), 325–355;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S.D. Krasner (ed.) (1983) International Regimes (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See, for examples, L.L. Martin (1993) ‘Credibility, Costs, and Institutions: Cooperation on Economic Sanctions’, World Politics, 45 (3), 406–432;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Koremenos, C. Lipson and D. Snidal (2001) ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’, International Organization, 55 (4), 761–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Bull (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Buzan (2014) An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  27. B.J. Cohen (2008) International Political Economy: An Intellectual History (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 44–65.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Strange (1971) Sterling and British Policy: A Political Study of an International Currency in Decline (London: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  29. For Bull’s criticism of scientific approach, see H. Bull (1966) ‘International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach’, World Politics, 18 (3), 361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J.A. Frankel (2010) ‘Globalization of the Economy’, in J.A. Frieden, D.A. Lake and J.L. Broz (eds.) International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth, 5th ed. (New York: W.W. Norton), pp. 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  31. B.J. Cohen (2010) ‘The Triad and the Unholy Trinity: Problems of International Monetary Cooperation’, in J.A. Frieden, D.A. Lake and J.L. Broz (eds.) International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth, 5th ed. (New York: W.W. Norton), pp. 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S.D. Krasner (1976) ‘State Power and the Structure of International Trade’, World Politics, 28 (3), 317–347;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S.D. Krasner (1981) ‘Power Structures and Regional Development Banks’, International Organization, 35 (2), 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. L. Gruber (2000) Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Gilpin (2001) Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 148–195.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. Gilpin (1996) ‘Economic Evolution of National Systems’, International Studies Quarterly, 40 (3), 411–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. P.J. Katzenstein (2005) A World of Regions (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  38. For introduction, see Huggett, Fundamentals of Biogeography; M.V. Lomolino, B.R. Riddle and J.H. Brown (2006) Biogeography, 3 rd ed. (Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates);

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cox and P. D. Moore (2010) Biogeography: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach, 8th ed. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons);

    Google Scholar 

  40. M.V. Lomolino, D.F. Sax and J.H. Brown (eds.) (2004) Foundations of Biogeography: Classic Papers with Commentaries (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press);

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. McCarthy (2009) Here Be Dragons: How the Study of Animal and Plant Distributions Revolutionized Our Views of Life and Earth (New York: Oxford University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  42. J.J. Morrone (2009) Evolutionary Biogeography: An Integrative Approach with Case Studies (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  43. J.M. Smith (1990) ‘Explanation in Biology’, in Dudley Knowles (ed.) Explanation and Its Limits (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  44. For example, J. Greaves and W. Grant (2010) ‘Crossing the Interdisciplinary Divide: Political Science and Biological Science’, Political Studies, 58 (2), 320–339;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. R.D. Masters (1990) ‘Evolutionary Biology and Political Theory’, American Political Science Review, 84 (1), 195–210;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. R.D. Masters (1991) The Nature of Power (New Haven, CN: Yale University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  47. R.D. Masters (1996) Machiavelli, Leonardo, and the Science of Power (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).

    Google Scholar 

  48. C. Bjornskov and M. Paldam (2012) ‘The Spirits of Capitalism and Socialism’, Public Choice, 150 (3–4), 469–498;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. E. Gundlach and M. Paldam (2009) ‘A Farewell to Critical Junctures: Sorting Out Long-Run Causality of Income and Democracy’, European Journal of Political Economy, 25 (3), 340–354;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. J.G. Hariri (2012), ‘The Autocratic Legacy of Early Statehood’, American Political Science Review, 106 (3), 471–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hariri, ‘Autocratic Legacy of Early Statehood’; O. Olsson and D.A. Hibbs, Jr. (2005) ‘Biogeography and Long-Run Economic Development’, European Economic Review, 49, 909–38;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. M.B. Petersen and S-E. Skaaning (2010) ‘Ultimate Causes of State Formation: The Significance of Biogeography, Diffusion, and Neolithic Revolutions’, Historical Social Research, 35 (3), 200–226.

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Rosenberg (2000) Darwinism in Philosophy: Social Science and Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 58–60. Emphasis in original.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. M. von Cranach (ed.) (1976) Methods of Inference from Animal to Human Behaviour (Chicago, IL: Aldine).

    Google Scholar 

  55. M. von Cranach (1976) ‘Introduction: The Order of Topics in This Book’, in Mario von Cranach (ed.) Methods of Inference from Animal to Human Behaviour (Chicago, IL: Aldine), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Ming Wang

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wan, M. (2016). Power, Order and Biogeography. In: The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: The Construction of Power and the Struggle for the East Asian International Order. The Political Economy of East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137593870_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics