Examining the Thomas Paine Corpus: Automated Computer Authorship Attribution Methodology Applied to Thomas Paine’s Writings
Thomas Paine was one of the most widely read and influential writers in the era of Democratic Revolutions in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. He was a philosopher and a political leader who affected the course of the great revolutions in America and France, and whose writings still have relevance in modern politics. It is important to clarify the body of work that Paine produced. There has been speculation as to what actually were his writings, what has been left out of collections, and what has been mistakenly added to his works. For example, Philip Foner in his once authoritative Complete Writings of Thomas Paine, includes “An Occasional Letter on the Female Sex” and remarks, “Although there is evidence to prove that this article … was not written by Paine … it has been included in the present edition” because it may represent the sentiments of Paine.1 “African Slavery in America” was left out of Eric Foner’s Thomas Paine: Collected Writings, indicating some doubt to the attribution to Paine.2 Until an accurate collected works can be established, the scholarship on Paine will remain incomplete, and the public and academia will continue to misattribute quotes and opinions to Paine without historical support. The goal of our text analysis project is to address this deficiency.
KeywordsFunction Word Sentence Length Stylistic Feature Lexical Feature Interest Subject
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Thomas Paine, The Complete Writings of Thomas Paine, ed. Philip Foner (New York: Citadel Press, 1969), 2: 34.Google Scholar
- 2.Thomas Paine, Thomas Paine: Collected Writings, ed. Eric Foner (New York: Literary Classics of the United States, 1995).Google Scholar
- 3.Thomas Paine, The Writings of Thomas Paine, ed. Charles R. and George Webster (Albany, NY: Webster, 1792). Thomas Paine, The Works of Thomas Paine, ed. J. Jordan (London: J. Jordan, 1792).Google Scholar
- 4.Thomas Paine, Works of Thomas Paine, ed. James Carey (Philadelphia, PA: James Carey, 1797). Thomas Paine, Miscellaneous Letters & Essays on Various Subjects by Thomas Paine, ed. Robert Carlile (London: R. Carlile, 1819).Google Scholar
- 7.Thomas Paine, The Writings of Thomas Paine, ed. Moncure Conway (New York: AMS Press, 1967).Google Scholar
- 8.Thomas Paine, Life and Writings of Thomas Paine, ed. Daniel Edwin Wheeler (New York: V. Parke, 1908).Google Scholar
- 10.Frederick Mosteller and David L. Wallace, Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1964).Google Scholar
- 11.David Lowe and Robert Matthews, “Shakespeare vs. Fletcher: A Stylometric Analysis by Radial Basis Functions,” Computers and the Humanities 29 (1995): 449–461. Robert Matthews and Thomas Merriam, “Neural Computation in Stylometry: An Application to the Works of Shakespeare and Fletcher,” Literary and Linguistic Computing 8.4 (1993): 203–209. J. F. Burrows, Computation into Criticism: A Study of Jane Austen’s Novels and an Experiment in Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987). A. Q. Morton, “The Authorship of Greek Prose,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A), 128 (1965): 169–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ian Shapiro and Jane Calvert, eds., Selected Writings of Thomas Paine (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
- 22.A. Owen Aldridge, Thomas Paine’s American Ideology (Newark, NJ: U of Delaware Press, 1984), 219–239.Google Scholar
- 23.Bernard Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967).Google Scholar