Skip to main content

Upside-Down Tax Incentives

  • Chapter
Retirement on the Rocks
  • 222 Accesses

Abstract

Retirement is ultimately a costly proposition since people can spend decades without earning money from work and taking care of their loved ones and themselves. They hence need to save a lot of money outside of Social Security for their own future. Policy offers some help to people wanting to save for their retirement, but it provides the least help to those who face the largest risk exposure and thus greatest obstacles to saving more. The federal government already uses the tax code to incentivize people to save, typically through tax advantages for particular savings such as retirement savings in 401(k) plans. But these savings incentives are complex and favor higher income earners over those with lower earnings. The help that the tax code offers consequently does little to combat the growing retirement crisis since it fails to adequately target those who actually need help.

How would you personally define what a secure retirement means to you?1

“To have a number of investments and inheritance.” (White woman, 84 years old)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 50.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Shlomo Bernartzi and Richard Thaler, “Heuristics and Biases in Retirement Savings Behavior,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21, no. 3 (Summer 2007), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheena Sethi-Iyengar and others, “How Much Choice Is Too Much? Contributions to 401(k) Retirement Plans,” in Olivia S. Mitchell and Stephen P. Utkus, eds., Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eric M. Engen and William G. Gale, “The Effects of 401(k) Plans on Household Wealth” (Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniel J. Benjamin, “Does 401(k) Eligibility Increase Saving?” Journal of Public Economics 87, no. 5 (2003), 1259–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. There is a substantial debate in the literature over the exact discount rate to use for retirement calculations. For a discussion of discount rates for DB pension plans, see Christian Weller and Dean Baker, “Smoothing the Waves of Pension Funding: Could Changes in Funding Rules Help Avoid Cyclical Under-funding,” The Journal of Policy Reform 8, no. 2 (June 2005), 131–151. I choose six percent here as the discount rate to make my results comparable to others, specifically those generated by the ICI’s Peter Brady.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Christian E. Weller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weller, C.E. (2016). Upside-Down Tax Incentives. In: Retirement on the Rocks. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137575142_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics