Advertisement

Zombie Masses: Monsters for the Age of Global Capitalism

  • David R. Castillo
Chapter
  • 570 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter re-examines the current zombie craze in the context of a discussion of modern monsters. From abnormal births to witches and vampires to today’s zombie masses, monsters have populated our imagination since the dawn of modernity. Going back to the late middle ages and the early modern period, monsters have been interpreted as both signs and warnings, in accordance with etymologies that traced the word “monster” to the Latin verbs monstrare (to show or reveal) and monere (to warn or admonish). Taking this notion as a point of departure, this chapter asks and seeks to answer the following questions: Why is it that our favorite monsters today are undead humans, i.e., vampires and, especially, zombies?

Keywords

Global Capitalism Graphic Scene Early Modern Period Zombie Product Hybrid Creature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Marie-Hélene Huet, “Introduction to Monstrous Imagination” in The Horror Reader, ed. Ken Gelder (New York: Routledge, 2000), 87.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elena Del Río Parra, Una era de monstruos: Representaciones de lo deforme en el Siglo de Oro español (Madrid: Iberoamericana, 2003), 24.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    See José Antonio Maravall, La cultura del barroco: Análisis de una estructura histórica (Barcelona: Ariel, 1975).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    See David R. Castillo, Baroque Horrors: Roots of the Fantastic in the Age of Curiosities (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Barbara Benedict, A Cultural History of Early Modern Inquiry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001), 180.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Joseph Conrad, “Turgenev,” in Notes on Life and Letters (Garden City, NY: Double, Page & Company, 1921), 46.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    For psychoanalytic and feminist approaches, see Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, trans. León Roudiez (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982), andGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbara Creed, The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis (New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
  9. José Monleón’s A Specter Is Haunting Europe: A Sociohistorical Approach to the Fantastic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990) is a classic example of the social-historical treatment of the modern fantastic.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ken Gelder, “Introduction to Part 5,” in The Horror Reader, ed. Ken Gelder (New York: Routledge, 2000), 146.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stephen Arata, “The Occidental Tourist: Dracula and the Anxiety of Reverse Colonization,” in The Horror Reader, ed. Ken Gelder (New York: Routledge, 2000), 166.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Franco Moretti, “Dialectic of Fear (Extract),” in The Horror Reader, ed. Ken Gelder (New York: Routledge, 2000), 149.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Seth Grahame-Smith, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter (New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2010), 192.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Guillermo del Toro and Chuck Hogan, The Night Eternal (New York: HaperCollins Publishing, 2011), 206–7.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    Margaret Greer, Maria de Zayas Tells Baroque Tales of Love and the Cruelty of Men (Studies in Romance Literatures) (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
  16. and Amy Williamsen, “Challenging the Code: Honor in Maria de Zayas,” in Maria de Zayas: The Dynamics of Discourse, eds. Amy Williamsen and Judith Whitenack (Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1995), 170–91.Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Maria de Zayas, Desengaños amorosos, Ed. Alicia Yllera (Madrid, Cátedra, 1983), 287Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    While the notion of the post-human can be traced back to different (and often conflicting) theorizations, such as those of Robert Pepperell (The Posthuman Condition: Consciousness Beyond the Brain [2003]) and Katherine Hayles (How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics [1999]), this concept has been recently associated with the zombie phenomenon. See, for example,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deborah Christie and Sarah Juliet Lauro, eds., Better Off Dead: The Evolution of the Zombie as Post-Human (Bronx, NY: Fordham University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    As Slavoj Žižek writes in The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology (London: Verso, 1999): “The horizon of social imagination no longer allows us to entertain the idea of an eventual demise of capitalism… everybody tacitly accepts that capitalism is here to stay” (218).Google Scholar
  21. 27.
    See Seth Grahame-Smith, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (Philadelphia, PA: Quirk Productions, 2009).Google Scholar
  22. 28.
    Veronica Roth, “Bonus Materials,” in Divergent (New York: Katherine Tegen Books, 2011), 5.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    Víctor Conde, Naturaleza muerta (Palma de Mallorca: Dolmen, 2009), 296.Google Scholar
  24. 33.
    Lázaro González Pérez de Tormes, Lazarillo Z: Matar Zombies nunca fue pan comido (Barcelona: Debolsillo, 2010), 167Google Scholar
  25. 35.
    Hernán Migoya, Una, grande y zombie (Barcelona: Ediciones B, 2011), 192.Google Scholar
  26. 42.
    See the biographical note in Manuel Martín, Noche de dijuntos del 38 (Palma de Mallorca: Dolmen, 2012).Google Scholar
  27. 43.
    Jorge Fernández Gonzalo, Filosofía zombi (Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama, 2011), 195.Google Scholar
  28. 44.
    David Peisner, “Blood, Sweat, & Zombies,” Rolling Stone, no. 1194, October 24, 2013, 55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David R. Castillo, David Schmid, David A. Reilly and John Edgar Browning 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Castillo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations