Skip to main content
  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

Many people find moral relativism attractive because it seems to encourage cultural tolerance, while others are repelled because it seems to entail quietism about horrendous cultural practices. Vulgar forms of moral relativism are easy enough to criticize or even expose as incoherent, but more thoughtful relativists, such as David Wong and Jesse Prinz, have the intellectual resources to resist many of the usual criticisms of relativist theories. They have much to teach us, their research programs are promising, and their positions deserve to be taken seriously. Nonetheless, relativist accounts of moral language remain unconvincing, and moral relativism does not provide a plausible solution to the mystery of moral authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Russell Blackford

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blackford, R. (2016). Moral Relativism(s). In: The Mystery of Moral Authority. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137562708_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics