Abstract
Under Magna Carta, freemen were judged by peers. As Scutt observes, women tried, convicted and hanged by all-male juries and judges, prosecuted by men and represented by male defence counsel lacked jury rights. Women were condemned as witches because Hale said witches existed in law and the Bible. As ‘non-persons’, women could not be jurors, judges, prosecutors or defence counsel. Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton asserted women’s jury rights. Canadian, US, UK, Aotearoal New Zealand and Australian women campaigned for jury rights equal to men. Defence counsel said women favoured accused in rape cases, then claimed women favoured rape victims/survivors. Only in the late 20th century were women acknowledged as peers’, to sit, like men, on juries deciding guilt or innocence — of women and men alike.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Holt, Magna Carta, 2015, p. 89.
Young, Trial of Frederick Bywaters, 1923, p. 8; following quotations this source, p. 8.
Jesse, A Pin to see the Peepshow, 1934, 1979, p. 353.
Gibson, What Are You?, 2013, p. 13; following quotations this source, pp. 19–20.
Pizan, The Book of the City, 1405, 1999, pp. 29–30.
Carpenter, Magna Carta, 2015, pp. 22–44.
McCammon, The U.S. Women’s jury Movements, 2012, pp. 1, 37
Scutt, The Incredible Woman, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Jocelynne A. Scutt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scutt, J.A. (2016). Are Women Peers?. In: Women and Magna Carta: A Treaty for Rights or Wrongs?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137562357_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137562357_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-85071-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56235-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)