Abstract
It has been speculated that the practice of protecting foreign envoys from attacks and personal injury has been in existence since time immemorial.1 Various studies on the history of ancient civilizations, whether in Asia, the Middle East, the ancient Near East, Africa, Europe, or North America, have always revealed the high degree of inviolability attached to the personality of foreign messengers.2 The concept of immunity and the inviolability of diplomatic envoys is recognized by various religious beliefs, sanctioned by customs, and fortified by reciprocity.3 Historically, most religions have underscored the essence of the inviolability of envoys to the extent that attack on the persons of ambassadors has been condemned as an impious act.4 One may possibly argue that there is no particular civilization, nation, or community that can possibly claim to be the sole originator of this universally acknowledged concept.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See J.C. Barker, The Protection of Diplomatic Personnel (Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham, UK, 2006), p. 29, while referring to the work of Harold Nicolson that it is not beyond probability that the communities of the cave-dwelling anthropoid apes would have by diplomatic means resolved among one another a day’s battle. Nicolson, Diplomacy, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 6.
L.S. Frey and M.L. Frey, The History of Diplomatic Immunity (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999), p. 3.
G. Jackson, Concorde Diplomacy: The Ambassador’s Role in the World Today (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1981), pp. 92–93.
K. Dalacoura, “Violence, September 11 and the Interpretations of Islam,” International Relations, 16 (2002), p. 269.
J.L. Esposito, Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 120.
H. Grotius, De Jure Belli ac Pacis-The Law of War and Peace (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925), Vol. 2, Book II.
G. Mattingly, Renaissance Diplomacy (London: Jonathan Cape, 1955), p. 45.
M.A. Ghazi (tr.), Kitab al-Siyar al-Shaybani — The Shorter Book on Muslim International Law (New Delhi: Adam Publishers and Distributors, 2004).
S. Mahmassani, ‘The Principles of International Law in The Light of Islamic Doctrine’, in Hague Academy of International Law, Recueil Des Cours: Volume 117 1966/I (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1968), pp. 264–265.
See T. Hampton, “The Diplomatic Moment: Representing Negotiation in Early Modern Europe,” MLQ, 67(1) (2006), pp. 82–83.
See C.A. Ford, “Siyar-ization and Its Discontents: International Law and Islam’s Constitutional Crisis,” TILJ, 30 (1995), p. 500.
See also M. Berger, “Islamic Views on International Law,” in P. Meerts (ed.), Culture and International Law (The Hague: Hague Academic Coalition, 2008), p. 107
D.A. Westbrook, “Islamic International Law and Public International Law: Separate Expressions of World Order,” VJIL, 33 (1992–1993), p. 883
A.I. Bouzenita, “The Siyar— An Islamic Law of Nations?” AJSS, 35 (2007), p. 44.
See N.A. Shah, Islamic Law and the Law of Armed Conflict: The Conflict in Pakistan (Aningdon: Routledge, 2011), p. 16.
O. Dorr and K. Schmalenbach (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2012), p. 240.
See R. Higgins, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: OUP, 1994), pp. 86–87
M.J.L. Hardy, Modern Diplomatic Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1968), p. 5.
A.E. Mayer, “War and Peace in the Islamic Tradition and International Law,” in J. Kelsay and J.T. Johnson, Just War and Jihad: Historical and Theoretical Perspective on War and Peace in Western and Islamic Traditions (New York: Green Press, 1991), p. 199.
S. Mahmassani, op. cit. (1968); J. Rehman, Islamic States Practices, International Law and The Threat From Terrorism: A Critique of the “Clash of Civilizations” in the New World Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005)
H.M. Zawati, Is Jihad a Just War? War, Peace and Human Rights under Islamic and Public International Law (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2001).
See N.A. Shah, Women, The and International Human Rights Law (Leiden/ Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006), pp. 8–13.
I. Shihata, “Islamic Law and the World Community,” Harvard Int’l C J, 4 (1962), p. 107.
M. Khadduri, “Islam and Modern Law of Nations,” AJIL, 50 (1956), pp. 370–371.
M.A. Baderin, “The Evolution of Islamic Law of Nations and Modern International Order: Universal Peace through Mutuality and Cooperation,” American Journal Islamic Social Sciences, 17(2) (2000), p. 59.
G.M. Badr, “A Survey of Islamic International Law,” American Society International Law Proceedings, 76 (1982), p. 58.
C.G. Weeramantry, Islamic Jurisprudence: An International Perspective (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988), p. 166.
See A. Cassese, International Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: OUP, 2005), p. 213.
N.A. Shah, Self-Defense in Islamic and International Law: Assessing Al-Qaeda and the Invasion of Iraq (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), p. 6.
J. Salmond (Glanville L. Williams, ed.) Jurisprudence, 10th ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd., 1947), pp. 7–8
B.A. Garner (ed.), Black’s Law Dictionary (Eagan: Thomson West, 2004), p. 300.
International Commission of Jurists, Human Rights in Islam Report of a Seminar held in Kuwait in December, 1980 (Geneva: ICJ, 1982), p. 7.
J.L. Esposito (ed.), The Oxford Dictionary of Islam (Oxford: OUP, 2003), p. 297.
Copyright information
© 2016 Muhammad-Basheer A. Ismail
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ismail, MB.A. (2016). Introduction. In: Islamic Law and Transnational Diplomatic Law. Philosophy, Public Policy, and Transnational Law. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137558770_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137558770_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56416-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55877-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)