Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy, Public Policy, and Transnational Law ((PPPTL))

  • 363 Accesses

Abstract

It has been speculated that the practice of protecting foreign envoys from attacks and personal injury has been in existence since time immemorial.1 Various studies on the history of ancient civilizations, whether in Asia, the Middle East, the ancient Near East, Africa, Europe, or North America, have always revealed the high degree of inviolability attached to the personality of foreign messengers.2 The concept of immunity and the inviolability of diplomatic envoys is recognized by various religious beliefs, sanctioned by customs, and fortified by reciprocity.3 Historically, most religions have underscored the essence of the inviolability of envoys to the extent that attack on the persons of ambassadors has been condemned as an impious act.4 One may possibly argue that there is no particular civilization, nation, or community that can possibly claim to be the sole originator of this universally acknowledged concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See J.C. Barker, The Protection of Diplomatic Personnel (Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham, UK, 2006), p. 29, while referring to the work of Harold Nicolson that it is not beyond probability that the communities of the cave-dwelling anthropoid apes would have by diplomatic means resolved among one another a day’s battle. Nicolson, Diplomacy, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.S. Frey and M.L. Frey, The History of Diplomatic Immunity (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Jackson, Concorde Diplomacy: The Ambassador’s Role in the World Today (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1981), pp. 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Dalacoura, “Violence, September 11 and the Interpretations of Islam,” International Relations, 16 (2002), p. 269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.L. Esposito, Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Grotius, De Jure Belli ac Pacis-The Law of War and Peace (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925), Vol. 2, Book II.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Mattingly, Renaissance Diplomacy (London: Jonathan Cape, 1955), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.A. Ghazi (tr.), Kitab al-Siyar al-Shaybani — The Shorter Book on Muslim International Law (New Delhi: Adam Publishers and Distributors, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Mahmassani, ‘The Principles of International Law in The Light of Islamic Doctrine’, in Hague Academy of International Law, Recueil Des Cours: Volume 117 1966/I (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1968), pp. 264–265.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See T. Hampton, “The Diplomatic Moment: Representing Negotiation in Early Modern Europe,” MLQ, 67(1) (2006), pp. 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See C.A. Ford, “Siyar-ization and Its Discontents: International Law and Islam’s Constitutional Crisis,” TILJ, 30 (1995), p. 500.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See also M. Berger, “Islamic Views on International Law,” in P. Meerts (ed.), Culture and International Law (The Hague: Hague Academic Coalition, 2008), p. 107

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.A. Westbrook, “Islamic International Law and Public International Law: Separate Expressions of World Order,” VJIL, 33 (1992–1993), p. 883

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.I. Bouzenita, “The Siyar— An Islamic Law of Nations?” AJSS, 35 (2007), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See N.A. Shah, Islamic Law and the Law of Armed Conflict: The Conflict in Pakistan (Aningdon: Routledge, 2011), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. Dorr and K. Schmalenbach (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2012), p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See R. Higgins, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: OUP, 1994), pp. 86–87

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.J.L. Hardy, Modern Diplomatic Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1968), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.E. Mayer, “War and Peace in the Islamic Tradition and International Law,” in J. Kelsay and J.T. Johnson, Just War and Jihad: Historical and Theoretical Perspective on War and Peace in Western and Islamic Traditions (New York: Green Press, 1991), p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Mahmassani, op. cit. (1968); J. Rehman, Islamic States Practices, International Law and The Threat From Terrorism: A Critique of the “Clash of Civilizations” in the New World Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. H.M. Zawati, Is Jihad a Just War? War, Peace and Human Rights under Islamic and Public International Law (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See N.A. Shah, Women, The and International Human Rights Law (Leiden/ Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006), pp. 8–13.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Shihata, “Islamic Law and the World Community,” Harvard Int’l C J, 4 (1962), p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Khadduri, “Islam and Modern Law of Nations,” AJIL, 50 (1956), pp. 370–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M.A. Baderin, “The Evolution of Islamic Law of Nations and Modern International Order: Universal Peace through Mutuality and Cooperation,” American Journal Islamic Social Sciences, 17(2) (2000), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G.M. Badr, “A Survey of Islamic International Law,” American Society International Law Proceedings, 76 (1982), p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C.G. Weeramantry, Islamic Jurisprudence: An International Perspective (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988), p. 166.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. See A. Cassese, International Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: OUP, 2005), p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N.A. Shah, Self-Defense in Islamic and International Law: Assessing Al-Qaeda and the Invasion of Iraq (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), p. 6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Salmond (Glanville L. Williams, ed.) Jurisprudence, 10th ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd., 1947), pp. 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  31. B.A. Garner (ed.), Black’s Law Dictionary (Eagan: Thomson West, 2004), p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  32. International Commission of Jurists, Human Rights in Islam Report of a Seminar held in Kuwait in December, 1980 (Geneva: ICJ, 1982), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J.L. Esposito (ed.), The Oxford Dictionary of Islam (Oxford: OUP, 2003), p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Muhammad-Basheer A. Ismail

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ismail, MB.A. (2016). Introduction. In: Islamic Law and Transnational Diplomatic Law. Philosophy, Public Policy, and Transnational Law. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137558770_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics