Skip to main content

Decentralisation and Local Governance Approach: A Prospect for Implementing the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals

  • Chapter
Local Governance, Economic Development and Institutions

Part of the book series: EADI Global Development Series ((EADI))

Abstract

Since 1980, Professor A.H.J (Bert) Helmsing has been involved in research, lecturing and supervision of PhD dissertations on decentralisation, local governance, enablement and service provision across four continents (Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America). His work on these subjects has provided new insights into the changing governance modalities for efficient and effective public services delivery at the local level. Lessons on the implementation of the millennium development goals (MDGs) showed that decentralisation and the local governance approach helped governments and development partners to achieve progress. No doubt, implementation of nine of the seventeen proposed sustainable development goals (SDGs) to replace the eight millennium development goals will benefit substantially from the decentralisation and local governance approach that Helmsing has spearheaded. Being his student, supervisee, mentee and later, colleague at ISS, I am extremely honoured to push his ideas on this approach forward towards implementation of the post-2015 global development agenda. While implementation of the agenda will not be part of Helmsing’s teaching or supervising assignment, it will surely involve his ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adamolekun, L. (1999) ‘Decentralization, sub -national governments and intergovernmental relations’, in L. Adamolekun (ed.) Public Administration in Africa, pp. 49–67. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Africa Union (2012) ‘MDG Report 2012: Assessing progress in Africa towards MDG: Emerging perspectives from Africa on the Post-2015 development agenda’. Accessed 19 September 2014, <http://www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/PublicationFiles/ mdgreport2012_Eng.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awortwi, N. (2010) ‘An unbreakable path? A comparative study of decentralisation and local government development trajectories in Ghana and Uganda’, International Review of Administrative Science 77(2): 347–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awortwi, N. (2004a) ‘Getting the fundamentals wrong: Woes of public-private partnerships in solid waste collection in Ghanaian cities’, Public Administration and Development 24(3): 213–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awortwi, N. (2004b) ‘Managing multiple modalities of delivering basic services in three major Ghanaian cities’, Africa Development 27(3–4): 76–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancati, D. (2009) Peace by Design: Managing Interstate Conflict through Decentralization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillantes, A.B. and N.G. Cuachon (2002) ‘Decentralisation: An overview’, in A.B. Brillantes, N.G. Cuachon (eds) Decentralisation and Power Shift: An Imperative for Good Governance, pp. 1–11. Centre for Local and Regional Governance (CLRG) Working Paper/Series, No. 2. Philippines: CLRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIGI (2012) ‘Post-2015 goals, targets and indicators’ (10–11 April 2012). Accessed 21 July 2012, <http://www.cigionline.org>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Secretariat (2010) ‘Decentralisation in commonwealth Africa: Experiences from Botswana, Cameroun, Ghana, Mozambique and Tanzania’. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCD/DAC (2012) ‘Global development goals beyond 2015’. Accessed 12 March 2013, <http://oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf/?cote=DCD/DAC(2012)10/REV1&docLanguage=En>.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID (2003) ‘Drivers of change Paper 1: What does drivers of change mean for DFID? An approach paper’. Oxford: Oxford Policy Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillinger, W. (1994) ‘Decentralisation and its implications for urban service delivery’, Urban Management and Municipal Finance Discussion Paper No. 16. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ECE, ESCAP, UNDESA, UNICEF, UNRISD, UNFEM (2012) ‘Addressing inequalities: the heart of the post-2015 agenda and the future we want for all’. Thematic Think Piece: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S. (2012) ‘Should global goal setting continue, and how, in the Post-2015 era?’, DESA Working Paper No. 117, ST/ESA/2012/DWP/117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Forum on Local Development (2010) ‘Localizing the MDGs: local development and MDGs: what role for local governments?’, Conference framing paper presented at the Global Forum on Local Development, Kampala, Uganda (4–6 October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmsing, A.H.J. (2001) Local Economic Development. New Generation of Actors, Policies and Instruments. The Hague: ISS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICLEI (2011) ‘Briefing sheet: Green urban economy’, Discussion paper January 2011. Bonn: Local Governments for Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, G., D. Gasper, R. Jolly and M. Simane (2012) Human Security and the Next Generation of Comprehensive Human Development Goals. Sussex: IDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koranteng, R.O and G.A. Larbi (2008) ‘Policy networks, politics and decentralisation policies in Ghana’, Public Administration and Development 28(3): 212–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, K.L. and D.K. Leonard (2004) ‘The political economy of improving health care for the poor in rural Africa: Institutional solutions to the principal-agent problem’, The Journal of Development Studies 40(4): 50–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvack, J. and J. Seddon (1999) ‘Decentralization briefing notes’, WBI Working Papers. Washington DC: World Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2002) ‘Redrawing the body politic: Federalism, regionalism and the creation of new states in India’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 40(3): 34–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melamed, C. (2012) ‘After 2015: Contexts, politics and processes for a post-2015 global agreement on development’. ODI Research Report (January). Accessed 14 June 2012, <http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/details.asp?id=6231&title=millennium-development-goals-mdgs-post-2015>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olowu, D. and J.S. Wunsch (2004) Local Governance in Africa: The Challenges of Democratic Decentralization. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam (2005) ‘Breathing life into democracy: The power of participatory budgeting’. London: Oxfam GB/Community Pride Initiative (brochure).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2009) ‘Investing for growth: Building on innovative regions’. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepulveda, C. and J. Martinez-Vazquez (2012) ‘The consequences of fiscal decentralisation on poverty and income inequality’, Environment and Planning: Government and Policy 29(2): 321–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsagourias, N. (2011) ‘Security Council Legislation, Article 2(7) of the UN Charter and the Principle of Subsidiarity’, Adam Smith Research Foundation Working Paper No. 2011–05. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2014a) The Millennium Development Report2014. New York: UN.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2014b) Open Working Group Proposal for Sustainable Development Goals. New York: UN. Accessed 2 April 2015, <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1579SDGs%20Proposal.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2012a) ‘Briefing with UN Delegates on Post 2015 Development Agenda’, paper presented at the UNHQ, New York (28 February). Accessed 12 June 2012, <http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/usg/statements/Post-2015-development-agenda-2.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2012b) ‘Resolution 66/288: The future we want’. New York: UN General Assembly.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2012c) ‘Realizing the future we want for all: Report to the Secretary-General’. New York: United Nations (brochure).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2012d) Millennium Development Goals Report. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2010) The Path to Achieving the MDG. A Synthesis of Evidence from around the World. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2012) ‘Localizing sustainable development in local spaces: consideration for Post-2015 global development agenda’. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1999) ‘Decentralization: A sampling of definitions’, Working paper by UNDP-Government of Germany evaluation of the UNDP role in decentralization and local governance. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP International Assessment (2010) Somalia Country Case. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Capital Development Fund (1999) Taking Risks: Background Papers. New York: UNCDF.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Capital Development Fund (2010) ‘Local Development Outlook: Cambodia’. New York: UNCDF.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2010) ‘Comparative assessment of decentralization in Africa: final report and summary of findings’. USAID <http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADX211.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veigel, K. (2012) ‘Decentralisation matters for the poor’, Discussion Paper Governance April 2012. Frankfurt: KFW Entwicklungsbank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T., R. Jolly and L. Emmerij (2009) UNIdeas That Changed the World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010) ‘Global Monitoring Report’. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Food Programme (2011) ‘School feeding cost benefit analysis recorded countries Bangladesh, Ghana, Kenya, Laos, Mozambique, Malawi, Cambodia, Zambia’. Washington DC: World Bank. Accessed July 2015 <http://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/newsroom/wfp208643.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Nicholas Awortwi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Awortwi, N. (2016). Decentralisation and Local Governance Approach: A Prospect for Implementing the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals. In: Gómez, G.M., Knorringa, P. (eds) Local Governance, Economic Development and Institutions. EADI Global Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137557599_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137557599_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-71838-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55759-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics