Skip to main content
  • 121 Accesses

Abstract

Of vital importance for Joe Spencer’s ‘ratcatchers’ was liaison work with other British and Allied agencies in the region, namely 10th Army HQ (PAIFORCE); the British legation; the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), operating locally as the Inter-Services Liaison Department (ISLD); the Special Operations Executive (SOE); US Persian Gulf (Service) Command (PGSC/PGC), including the field-security forces of the US Counter Intelligence Corps (CIC); and, last but by no means least, the security forces of the Soviet Union (NKVD). In order to ensure tight occupational security, Spencer realized from when he first arrived in Tehran at the beginning of 1942 that the maintenance of effective liaison between the occupying powers was crucial, and that internal security could only be effective if the competent authorities in both zones regularly discussed problems of mutual interest and concern. As Sir Reader Bullard noted in 1945, notwithstanding American ‘inexperience’ and Russian ‘ill will’, Persia was the one country where British, American, and Soviet civil and military authorities met on a broad land front, and the necessary contacts at the various technical levels proceeded reasonably smoothly and efficiently, in spite of difficulties in the political sphere.2

Russian attempts to penetrate us do not surprise or alarm us in the least. … We have always operated for the most part in the open, and this is probably what puzzles them most of all. (Alan Roger [ADSO Persia])1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. An excellent introduction to the Great Game as it was played in Persia, including German subversive activities in the region during the First World War, is Antony Wynn, Persia in the Great Game: Sir Percy Sykes, Explorer, Consul, Soldier, Spy (London: John Murray, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See also Karl E. Meyer and Shareen Blair Brysac, Tournament of Shadows: The Great Game and the Race for Empire in Central Asia (Washington, DC: Counterpoint, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. On the Great Game and Persia during the 1930s and 1940s, see Miron Rezun, ‘The Great Game Revisited’, International Journal 41, no. 2 (Spring 1986): 332–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. For a detailed study of Anglo-Soviet relations and the Great Game in the region during the Second World War, see Harold J. Kosiba, ‘Stalin’s Great Game: Anglo-Soviet Relations in the Near East, 1939–1943’ (PhD diss., Indiana, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Information about Russian intelligence methods in Persia derived from cooperation between DSO Tehran and the Russian security authorities, 7 March 1945, KV 4/224, TNA. According to Donal O’Sullivan, Dealing with the Devil: Anglo-Soviet Intelligence Cooperation during the Second World War (New York: Lang, 2010), 197–8, Asaturov’s real identity was I.I. Agayants, and Sosnin’s was P.M. Zhuravlev.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, The World Was Going Our Way: The KGB and the Battle for the Third World (New York: Basic Books, 2005), 169.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Report on cooperation with Russian security, 28 December 1944, KV 4/224, TNA. For Hamburger’s own fascinating and moving account of his years in exile, see Rudolf Hamburger and Maik Hamburger, Zehn Jahre Lager: Als deutscher Kommunist im sowjetischen Gulag (Munich: Siedler, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Most notably O’Sullivan, Dealing with the Devil, 205–13; Süleyman Seydi, ‘Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence Activities in Iran during the Second World War’, Middle Eastern Studies 46, no. 5 (September 2010): 733–52;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Calder Walton, Empire of Secrets: British Intelligence, the Cold War and the Twilight of Empire (New York: The Overlook Press, 2013), 70–1. Unfortunately, whilst Seydi’s synoptical skills are impressive, he cannot seem to master the fine details, repeatedly misspelling Franz Mayr’s name (and several others) and getting many elementary facts wrong.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Adrian O’Sullivan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Sullivan, A. (2015). Ruskies. In: Espionage and Counterintelligence in Occupied Persia (Iran). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137555571_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137555571_12

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55556-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55557-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics