Abstract
In a long and well-documented paper Dandekar and Rath [1] reach two major policy conclusions. Firstly, that the policy of imposing land ceilings would lead to fragmented and uneconomical holdings. In addition, the working of a free market economy would lead to a de facto (though not de jure) reconsolidation of land. They argue that a ‘patently uneconomic proposition cannot be sustained by law’.1 As an alternative policy to alleviate poverty they suggest a massive public works programme ‘to enable the 30 per cent rural poor living below the desired minimum (excluding the 10 per cent poorest) to reach the minimum consumer expenditure …’ This would be financed by the top 5 per cent of the rich agreeing ‘to a cut of a mere 15 per cent in their consumer expenditure’ and another 5 per cent ‘have to agree to a cut of a mere 7.5 per cent in their consumer expenditure.’2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
[1] Dandekar, V M and Rath, N: “Poverty in India”, Economic and Political Weekly, January 2 and 9, 1971.
[2] Junankar, P N: “Land Ceilings as a Tax on Agriculture: A Note”, Economic and Political Weekly, Review of Agriculture June 24, 1972.
Copyright information
© 1973 Economic and Political Weekly
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Junankar, P.N. (1973). Poverty in India: A Comment. In: Development Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137555229_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137555229_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-71714-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55522-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)