Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Materiality, Rules and Regulation pp 195–220Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

How Technology Remediates Practice: Objects, Rules, and New Media

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

Abstract

It was perhaps Friedrich Nietzsche who first had a glimpse of how technology remediates practice. In early 1882, the philosopher, suffering from encroaching blindness, bought a Malling-Hansen Writing Ball, an early typewriter that had its keyboard arranged in the form of a sphere, which made it look like a hedgehog. The fixed positions and the large size of the letters allowed him to write with more ease than by handwriting. As he experimented with the new ‘writing machine’, he came to realize that the tool affected his thinking. Using the machine led him to express his thoughts in short, telegraphic sentences. His writing style in the later period of his active life shifted from arguments to aphorisms, from thoughts to puns. Indeed, Nietzsche understood how his writing practice was being ‘remediated’ by the tool, and in a letter to Peter Gast in February 1882 expressed his insight in terse language:

‘Unser Schreibzeug arbeitet mit an unseren Gedanken’

(Our writing equipment is also working with our thoughts)

Delivered as a keynote paper at the Fourth Workshop on ‘Organizations, Artifacts, and Practices’, Rome, 26–27 June 2014. The chapter further elaborates and expands some material that has already appeared in First Monday, 15 (6–7), 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaltonen, V. A. & Lanzara, G. F. (2014). The Evolving Societas of Online Social Production Systems: Capabilities and Rights in the Governance of Wikipedia. 5th Latin American and European Meeting of Organization Studies (LAEMOS), 2–5 April 2014, Havana, Cuba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, J. & diSessa, A. (2003). Music As Embodied Mathematics: A Study of a Mutually Informing Affinity. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8 (2), 123–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. (2000). Lessons from a Dinosaur: Mediating IS Research Through an Analysis of the Medical Recording. In R. Baskerville, J. Stage & J. DeGross (eds), Organizational and Social Perspectives in Information Technology, 487–504. Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext and the Remediation of Print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1996). The Social Life of Documents. FirstMonday, 1 (1), 19. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/466/820

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. & Eisenhardt, K. (1997). The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Based Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R. (2004). How Images Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (1996). Engagement with Media: Shaping and Being Shaped. ComputerMediated Communication Magazine, February. Available at: http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/short/determ.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. & Pinch, T. J. (1982). Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N. & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science, 10 (4), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. (ed.) (2004). Things that Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2002/1922). Human Nature and Conduct. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrance Kelly, S. (2005). Seeing things in Merleau-Ponty. In T. Conman & M. B. N. Hansen (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, 74–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (1993). Culture and Control in Media Space. In G. De Michelis, C. Simone & K. Schmidt (eds), Hearing of the Third European Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work, 125–137. Milan, Italy, September 1993. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art. Cambridge, MA: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (2002). Writing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Control Rooms. Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 1 (1), 694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962/1927). Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorges, B. & Czarniawska, B. (1998). The Question of Technology, or How Organizations Inscribe the World. Organization Studies, 19 (3), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J. (2002). Reopening the Black Box of Technology: Artefacts and Human Agency. International Conference on Information Systems, 15–18 December 2002, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J. (2003). Mediated Action and Representation: On the Vicissitudes of Human Signification. Homo Oeconomicus, 19 (4), 607–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J. (2009). On the Computational Rendition of Reality: Artefacts and Human Agency. Organization, 16 (2), 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J. (2011). Governing through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A. V. & Marton, A. (2013). The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artefacts. MIS Quarterly, 37 (2), 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, F. A. (1997). Literature, Media, Information Systems: Essays (edited by J. Johnston). Amsterdam: G & B Arts International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, Film, Typewriter: Writing Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. & Brugger, U. (2002). Global Microstructures: The Global Societies of Financial Markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107 (4), 905–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzara, G. F. (2009). Reshaping Practice Across Media: Material Mediation, Medium Specificity and Practical Knowledge in Judicial Work. Organization Studies, 30 (12), 1369–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzara, G. F. & Morner, M. (2005). Artifacts Rule! How Organizing Happens in Open Source Software Projects. In B. Czarniawska & T. Hernes (eds), Actor-Network Theory and Organizing, 67–90. Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzara, G. F. & Patriotta, G. (2001). Technology and the Courtroom: An Inquiry into Knowledge Making in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38 (7), 94–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi P. M., Nardi, B. A. & Kallinikos, J. (eds) (2012). Materiality and Organizing. Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1998). Observations on Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2013). Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maras, S. & Sutton, D. (2000). Medium Specificity Re-visited. Convergence, 6 (2), 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/1945). Phenomenology of Perception (translated by C. Smith). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, R. (2009). Artifact Mediation in Dewey and in Cultural-historical Activity Theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8 (4), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, R., Frederick, D. S. & Yanov, D. (2009). Re-turn to Practice. An Introductory Essay. Organization Studies, 30 (12), 1309–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. Y. & Sproull, L. (2002). Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux kernel. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work, 381–404. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, G. & Stark, D. (2002). Permanently Beta: Responsive Organizations in the Internet Era. In P. N. Howard & S. Jones (eds), Society Online: The Internet in Context, 173–188. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (1994). Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (4), 54–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L. (1994). The Primitive Mode of Representation and the Evolution of Interactive Multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3 (3), 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyogg, G. & Sydow, J. (2010). Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 21 (6), 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. & Horwath, J. A. (eds) (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice: Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturken, M. & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaast, E. & Walsham, G. (2005). Representations and Actions: The Transformation of Work Practices with IT Use. Information and Organization, 15, 659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Giovan Francesco Lanzara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Paris-Dauphine, France

    François-Xavier de Vaujany  & Anouk Mukherjee  & 

  2. King’s College London, UK

    Nathalie Mitev

  3. University of Bologna, Italy

    Giovan Francesco Lanzara

Copyright information

© 2015 Giovan Francesco Lanzara

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lanzara, G.F. (2015). How Technology Remediates Practice: Objects, Rules, and New Media. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N., Lanzara, G.F., Mukherjee, A. (eds) Materiality, Rules and Regulation. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552648_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation