Skip to main content

Formal Weakness and Informal Strength? Transnational Socialist Party Cooperation in European Integration

  • Chapter
Transnational Socialist Networks in the 1970s

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements ((PSHSM))

  • 163 Accesses

Abstract

Formal dimensions of transnational party cooperation are characterised by structures, decision-making processes and functions that are codified in the statutes of partly or fully institutionalised transnational political networks of parties. Informal cooperation is not codified but, rather, is shaped by habits among and links between individuals. The formal dimensions of politics can have effects on the informal dimensions of politics and vice versa. As these effects depend on the structural conditions of political networks, the specific form of both political dimensions can be stable for a long time. Due to external impacts, internal shocks, reforms, and social and value changes, the formal and informal dimensions can alter rapidly, however. The formation and impact of the policy- and decision-making processes of a political network depend on the reciprocal effects between the formal and informal dimensions of politics.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On the general reciprocal effects between formal and informal dimensions of politics, see J. Betz and P. Köllner (2000) Informale Politik im internationalen Vergleich: ein Forschungsaufriss (Hamburg: Arbeitspapier Deutsches Übersee-Institut), 2ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a broad overview on the history of the Socialist International, see in particular J. Braunthal (1978) Geschichte der Internationale, vols 1–3, 2nd edition (vols 1–2) and 3rd edition (vol. 3) (Berlin, Bonn: Dietz).

    Google Scholar 

  3. There is also an English version of these three volumes: J. Braunthal (1967 and 1980) History of the International, vols 1–2 (1967) and vol. 3 (1980) (London: Nelson). As the German third edition of vol. 3 is a revised original version, this volume was used for this book.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, e.g., R. T. Griffiths (1993) ‘European Utopia or Capitalist Trap? The Socialist International and the Question of Europe’, in R. T. Griffiths (ed.), Socialist Parties and the Question of Europe in the 1950s (Leiden: Brill), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a comprehensive overview on the institutionalised structures of the SI, see E. Knopp (1992) Die Sozialistische Internationale. Herkunft, Aufbau und Ziele einer transnationalen Parteiorganisation (PhD thesis: Ruprecht-KarlsUniversität Heidelberg), 127–99.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, e.g., K.-L. Günsche and K. Lantermann (1977) Kleine Geschichte der Sozialistischen Internationale (Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft), 137.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. van Kemseke (2006) Towards an Era of Development. The Globalization of Socialism and Christian Democracy (Leuven: Leuven University Press), 53ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Janitschek (1978) ‘Zur Entwicklung und Tätigkeit der Sozialistischen Internationale’, in A. Kohl and A. Stirnemann (eds), Österreichisches Jahrbuch für Politik 1978 (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik), 199–243, here 203.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See B. Rother and W. Schmidt (2006) ‘Einleitung. Über Europa hinaus. “Dritte Welt” und Sozialistische Internationale’, in H. Grebing, G. Schöllgen and H. A. Winkler (eds), Willy Brandt, Berliner Ausgabe, vol. 8 (Bonn: Dietz), 15–107, here 34f.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See H. Wehner (1971) ‘Europa – keine Oase im Ringen um sozialen Ausgleich. Zum Harpsund-Treffen führender Sozialdemokraten’, Die Neue Gesellschaft, 18, 10, 700–01.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See N. Gresch (1976) ‘Zwischen Internationalismus und Nationaler Machtbehauptung. Die Europäische Zusammenarbeit der Sozialdemokratischen Parteien’, in Europäische Schriften des Instituts für Europäische Politik, Zusammenarbeit der Parteien in Westeuropa. Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen politischen Infrastruktur?, 43/44 (Bonn: Europa Union), 143–249, here 224.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The empty chairs crisis was triggered by the refusal of French representatives to attend intergovernmental meetings of EC bodies due to a disagreement with the European Commission on the financing of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). For an in-depth study on the empty chair crisis, see most recently P. Bajon (2012) Europapolitik ‘Am Abgrund’. Die Krise des ‘leeren Stuhls’ 1965–1966 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See also D. Hanley (1983) ‘Un Socialisme aux Couleur de L’Angleterre: Le Parti Travailliste et L’Internationale Socialiste depuis 1945’, in H. Portelli (ed.), L’Internationale Socialiste (Paris: Les Éditions Ouvrières), 57–66, here 65f.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See, e.g., W. Brandt (1976) Begegnungen und Einsichten. Die Jahre 1960–1975 (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe), 325.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See K. Steinnes (2014) The British Labour Party, Transnational Influences and European Community Membership, 1960–1973 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner), 172f.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See, e.g., P. Byrd (1975) ‘The Labour Party and the European Community, 1970–1975’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 13, 4, 469–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. For further information on the internal split of the British Labour Party on the European issue, see, e.g., K. Featherstone(1988) Socialist Parties and European Integration. A Comparative History (Manchester: Manchester University Press), 61;

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. W. Young (2004) ‘Europe’, in K. Hickson and A. Seldon (eds), New Labour, Old Labour: The Wilson and Callaghan Governments, 1974–1979 (London: Routledge), 139–53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. On the development from SFIO to French PS, see, in particular, D. S. Bell and B. Criddle (1988), The French Socialist Party: The Emergence of a Party of Government, 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 42–70.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For a short overview on the relations of the French PS with the PCF in the first half of the 1970s, see D. S. Bell (1975) ‘The Parti Socialiste in France’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 13, 4, 419–31, here 421–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Portelli (1983) ‘Le Parti Socialiste et L’I.S.’, in H. Portelli (ed.), L’Internationale Socialiste, 137–45, here 138.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, e.g., B. Criddle (1977) ‘The French Parti Socialiste’, in W. E. Paterson and A. H. Thomas (eds), Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe (New York: St. Martin’s Press), 25–57, here 46.

    Google Scholar 

  23. CERES was founded in 1966 by the far left activists Jean-Pierre Chevènement, Alain Gomez and Didier Motchane. For a generic study on the role of CERES within the French PS, broadly covering the 1970s, see D. Hanley (1986) Keeping Left? Ceres and the French Socialist Party. A Contribution to the Study of Fractionalism in Political Parties (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  24. On the Bagnolet congress, see detailed U. Guérot (1996) Die PS und Europa. Eine Untersuchung der europapolitischen Programmatik der französischen Sozialisten 1971–1995 (Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer), 142ff.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Flandre (2006) Socialisme ou social-démocratie? Regards croisés français allemands, 1971–1981 (Paris: Harmattan), 82.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See, e.g., A. Wilkens (2011) ‘Der “Andere Deutsche” im Blick von außen. Zur Perzeption Willy Brandts zu seiner Zeit und in der heutigen Erinnerungskultur’, in B. Rother (ed.), Willy Brandt. Neue Fragen, neue Erkenntnisse (Bonn: Dietz), 54–84, here 54.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See, e.g., P. Merseburger (2002) Willy Brandt 1913–1992, Visionär und Realist (Stuttgart, Munich: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt), 751.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Rother (2006) ‘Überwindung des Eurozentrismus. Erinnerungen an Willy Brandts Wahl zum SI-Vorsitzenden’, Die Neue Gesellschaft, 52, 12, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See, e.g., A. von Gehlen (2005) Europäisiche Parteiendemokratie? Institutionelle Voraussetzungen und Funktionsbedingungen der europäischen Parteien zur Minderung des Legitimationsdefizits der EU (PhD thesis: Freie Universität Berlin), http://www.gehlen.net/diss/Europaeische_Parteiendemokratie.pdf, date accessed 26 March 2015, 191.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See, e.g., S. Hix and U. Lesse (2002) Shaping a Vision. A History of the European Socialists 1957–2002 (Brussels: Party of European Socialists), 9f.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See, e.g., D. Hanley (2008) Beyond the Nation State. Parties in the Era of European Integration (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 62f.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See, e.g., N. Gresch (1978) Transnationale Parteienzusammenarbeit in der EG (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 95.

    Google Scholar 

  33. James May (1977) ‘Co-operation Between Socialist Parties’, in Paterson and Thomas (eds), Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe, 408–28, here 414.

    Google Scholar 

  34. The decision for first direct elections to the EP gave all western European party families a stimulus for the further development of transnational party cooperation at European level as emphasised, e.g., by G. Pridham and P. Pridham (1981) Transnational Party Co-operation and European Integration. The Process towards Direct Elections (London: Allen & Unwin), 235.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See, e.g., C. Hiepel (2006) ‘ “Europa gehört keiner Partei” Die SPD und der Weg vom Socialist Information and Liaison Office zur Sozialdemokratischen Partei Europas’, in J. Mittag (ed.), Politische Parteien und europäische Integration. Entwicklung und Perspektiven transnationaler Parteienkooperation in Europa (Essen: Klartext-Verlag), 271–88, here 283.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See, e.g., D. Hine (1979) ‘The Italian Socialist Party Under Craxi. Surviving but not Reviving’, Western European Politics, 2, 3, 133–48, here 134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. See S. Lightfoot (2005) Europeanizing Social Democracy? The Rise of the Party of European Socialists, (London: Routledge), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See, e.g., A. H. Thomas (1977) ‘Social Democracy in Denmark’, in Paterson and Thomas (eds), Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe, 234–71, here 257.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See C. Schildberg (2006) ‘Wegbereiter transnationaler Parteienkooperation? Die Rolle der parteinahen Stiftungen’, in Mittag (ed.), Politische Parteien und europäische Integration, 451–75, here 462–72.

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. Bartsch (1998) ‘Politische Stiftungen: Grenzgänger zwischen Gesellschaftsund Staatenwelt’, in K. Kaiser and W.-D. Eberwein (eds), Deutschlands neue Außenpolitik, vol. 4 (Munich: Oldenbourg), 185–98.

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Pinto-Duschinsky (1991) ‘Foreign Political Aid: The German Political Foundations and Their US Counterparts’, International Affairs, 67, 1, 33–63, here 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. P. von zur Mühlen (2007) Die internationale Arbeit der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Von den Anfängen bis zum Ende des Ost-West-Konflikts (Bonn: Dietz), 88.

    Google Scholar 

  43. P. von zur Mühlen (2008) ‘Die Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung als internationales Netzwerk’, in B. Unfried, J. Mittag and M. van der Linden (eds), Transnational Netzwerke im 20. Jahrhundert. Historische Erkundungen zu Ideen und Praktiken, Individuen und Organisationen, Transnational Networks in the 20th Century. Ideas and Practices, Individuals and Organizations (Vienna: Akademische Verlagsanstalt), 205–14, here 206.

    Google Scholar 

  44. These three domains still determine the international work of the FES and other German political foundations today, as stressed by Schildberg, ‘Wegbereiter transnationaler Parteienkooperation?’, 454; and D. Dakowska (2009) ‘Networks of Foundations as Norm Entrepreneurs: Between Politics and Policies in EU decision-making’, Journal of Public Policy, 29, 2, 201–21, here 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. G. Grunwald (1971) ‘Die internationale Arbeit der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’ in Solidarität. Alfred Nau zum 65. Geburtstag (Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft), 117–35, here 120.

    Google Scholar 

  46. For a general overview of the role of German political foundations in EC politics, see also D. Dakowska (2009) ‘Networking of Political Foundations. The Catalytic Effects of Transition and the European Union’s Eastern Enlargement’, in M. Gehler, W. Kaiser and B. Leucht (eds), Netzwerke im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Von 1945 bis zur Gegenwart. Networks in European Multi-Level Governance. From 1945 to the Present (Vienna: Böhlau), 185–200, here 189.

    Google Scholar 

  47. E. Röhrlich (2009) Kreiskys Außenpolitik: Zwischen österreichischer Identität und internationalem Programm (Göttingen: V&R Unipress), 229ff.

    Google Scholar 

  48. H. Berggren (2010) Olof Palme. Vor uns liegen wunderbare Tage. Die Biographie (Munich: btb Verlag), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  49. The group became later known as the Little Stockholm International. On its history, see, in particular, K. Misgeld (1976) Die ‘Internationale Gruppe demokratischer Sozialisten’ in Stockholm 1942–1945: Zur sozialistischen Friedensdiskussion während des Zweiten Weltkriegs (Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft).

    Google Scholar 

  50. See, e.g., P. Secher (1993) Bruno Kreisky. Chancellor of Austria: A Political Biography (Pittsburgh: Dorrance), 66.

    Google Scholar 

  51. On their roles as state actors and/or non-state actors, see also O. Rathkolb (2009) ‘Sozialdemokratische Netzwerke in der europäischen Nahostpolitik. Brandt, Kreisky und Palme als politische Unternehmer’, in Gehler, Kaiser and Leucht (eds), Netzwerke im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Networks in European Multi-Level Governance, 121–37, here 153f.

    Google Scholar 

  52. G. Grass, E. Jäckel and D. Lattmann (eds), (1975) (Demokratischer Sozialismus in Theorie und Praxis) Willy Brandt/Bruno Kreisky/Olof Palme. Briefe und Gespräche 1972–1975 (Cologne: Europäische Verlagsgesellschaft).

    Google Scholar 

  53. See, e.g., A. Wilkens (2005) ‘Willy Brandt, die deutsch-französischen Beziehungen und die Europapolitik (1969–1974)’, in H. Möller and M. Vaïsse (eds), Willy Brandt und Frankreich (Munich: Oldenbourg), 199–214, here 199.

    Google Scholar 

  54. For a recent evaluation of Brandt’s European policy, see the contributions in A. Wilkens (ed.), (2010) Wir sind auf dem richtigen Weg. Willy Brandt und die europäische Einigung (Bonn: Dietz).

    Google Scholar 

  55. C. Hiepel (2004) ‘Willy Brandt, Georges Pompidou und Europa. Das deutsch-französische Tandem in den Jahren 1969–1974’, in F. Knipping and M. Schönwald (eds), Aufbruch zum Europa der zweiten Generation. Die europäische Einigung 1969–1984 (Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag), 28–46, here 32;]

    Google Scholar 

  56. C. Hiepel (2012) Willy Brandt und Georges Pompidou. Deutsche und Französische Europapolitik zwischen Aufbruch und Krise (Munich: Oldenbourg), 319f.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. See, e.g., A. Wilkens (2004) ‘Willy Brandt und die europäische Einigung’, in M. König and M. Schulz (eds), Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland und die europäische Einigung 1949–2000 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner), 167–84, here 178ff.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See, e.g., M. Gehler (2014) ‘Bruno Kreisky, European Integration, the German Issue and Transnational Socialist Party Cooperation’, in J. Laursen (ed.), The Institutions and Dynamics of the European Community, 1973–83 (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 243–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  59. See M. Gehler and W. Kaiser (1997) ‘A Study in Ambivalence: Austria and European Integration 1945–95’, Contemporary European History, 6, 1, 75–99, here 94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. See A.-M. Ekengren (2011) ‘How Ideas Influence Decision-making. Olof Palme and Swedish Foreign Policy, 1965–1975’, Scandinavian Journal of History, 36, 2, 117–34, here 121f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. S. Gstöhl (2002) Reluctant Europeans. Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland in the Process of Integration (London: Lynne Rienner), 128f.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See, e.g., M. af Malmborg (2000) ‘Sweden’s long road to an agreement with the EEC, 1956–1972’, in M. Gehler and R. Steininger (eds), The Neutrals and the European Integration 1945–1995 (Vienna: Böhlau), 309–336, here 325.

    Google Scholar 

  63. On the European public sphere see, e.g., J.-H. Meyer (2010) The European Public Sphere. Media and Transnational Communication in Europe Integration1969–1991 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner).

    Google Scholar 

  64. See W. Kaiser (2013) ‘Europeanization of Christian Democracy? Negotiating Organisation, Enlargement, Policy and Allegiance in the European People’s Party’, in W. Kaiser and J.-H. Meyer (eds), Societal Actors in European Integration. Polity-Building and Policy-Making 1958–1992 (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 15–37, here 20.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Christian Salm

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salm, C. (2016). Formal Weakness and Informal Strength? Transnational Socialist Party Cooperation in European Integration. In: Transnational Socialist Networks in the 1970s. Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137551207_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137551207_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57950-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55120-7

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics