Abstract
Formal dimensions of transnational party cooperation are characterised by structures, decision-making processes and functions that are codified in the statutes of partly or fully institutionalised transnational political networks of parties. Informal cooperation is not codified but, rather, is shaped by habits among and links between individuals. The formal dimensions of politics can have effects on the informal dimensions of politics and vice versa. As these effects depend on the structural conditions of political networks, the specific form of both political dimensions can be stable for a long time. Due to external impacts, internal shocks, reforms, and social and value changes, the formal and informal dimensions can alter rapidly, however. The formation and impact of the policy- and decision-making processes of a political network depend on the reciprocal effects between the formal and informal dimensions of politics.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
On the general reciprocal effects between formal and informal dimensions of politics, see J. Betz and P. Köllner (2000) Informale Politik im internationalen Vergleich: ein Forschungsaufriss (Hamburg: Arbeitspapier Deutsches Übersee-Institut), 2ff.
For a broad overview on the history of the Socialist International, see in particular J. Braunthal (1978) Geschichte der Internationale, vols 1–3, 2nd edition (vols 1–2) and 3rd edition (vol. 3) (Berlin, Bonn: Dietz).
There is also an English version of these three volumes: J. Braunthal (1967 and 1980) History of the International, vols 1–2 (1967) and vol. 3 (1980) (London: Nelson). As the German third edition of vol. 3 is a revised original version, this volume was used for this book.
See, e.g., R. T. Griffiths (1993) ‘European Utopia or Capitalist Trap? The Socialist International and the Question of Europe’, in R. T. Griffiths (ed.), Socialist Parties and the Question of Europe in the 1950s (Leiden: Brill), 9–24.
For a comprehensive overview on the institutionalised structures of the SI, see E. Knopp (1992) Die Sozialistische Internationale. Herkunft, Aufbau und Ziele einer transnationalen Parteiorganisation (PhD thesis: Ruprecht-KarlsUniversität Heidelberg), 127–99.
See, e.g., K.-L. Günsche and K. Lantermann (1977) Kleine Geschichte der Sozialistischen Internationale (Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft), 137.
P. van Kemseke (2006) Towards an Era of Development. The Globalization of Socialism and Christian Democracy (Leuven: Leuven University Press), 53ff.
H. Janitschek (1978) ‘Zur Entwicklung und Tätigkeit der Sozialistischen Internationale’, in A. Kohl and A. Stirnemann (eds), Österreichisches Jahrbuch für Politik 1978 (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik), 199–243, here 203.
See B. Rother and W. Schmidt (2006) ‘Einleitung. Über Europa hinaus. “Dritte Welt” und Sozialistische Internationale’, in H. Grebing, G. Schöllgen and H. A. Winkler (eds), Willy Brandt, Berliner Ausgabe, vol. 8 (Bonn: Dietz), 15–107, here 34f.
See H. Wehner (1971) ‘Europa – keine Oase im Ringen um sozialen Ausgleich. Zum Harpsund-Treffen führender Sozialdemokraten’, Die Neue Gesellschaft, 18, 10, 700–01.
See N. Gresch (1976) ‘Zwischen Internationalismus und Nationaler Machtbehauptung. Die Europäische Zusammenarbeit der Sozialdemokratischen Parteien’, in Europäische Schriften des Instituts für Europäische Politik, Zusammenarbeit der Parteien in Westeuropa. Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen politischen Infrastruktur?, 43/44 (Bonn: Europa Union), 143–249, here 224.
The empty chairs crisis was triggered by the refusal of French representatives to attend intergovernmental meetings of EC bodies due to a disagreement with the European Commission on the financing of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). For an in-depth study on the empty chair crisis, see most recently P. Bajon (2012) Europapolitik ‘Am Abgrund’. Die Krise des ‘leeren Stuhls’ 1965–1966 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner).
See also D. Hanley (1983) ‘Un Socialisme aux Couleur de L’Angleterre: Le Parti Travailliste et L’Internationale Socialiste depuis 1945’, in H. Portelli (ed.), L’Internationale Socialiste (Paris: Les Éditions Ouvrières), 57–66, here 65f.
See, e.g., W. Brandt (1976) Begegnungen und Einsichten. Die Jahre 1960–1975 (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe), 325.
See K. Steinnes (2014) The British Labour Party, Transnational Influences and European Community Membership, 1960–1973 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner), 172f.
See, e.g., P. Byrd (1975) ‘The Labour Party and the European Community, 1970–1975’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 13, 4, 469–83.
For further information on the internal split of the British Labour Party on the European issue, see, e.g., K. Featherstone(1988) Socialist Parties and European Integration. A Comparative History (Manchester: Manchester University Press), 61;
J. W. Young (2004) ‘Europe’, in K. Hickson and A. Seldon (eds), New Labour, Old Labour: The Wilson and Callaghan Governments, 1974–1979 (London: Routledge), 139–53.
On the development from SFIO to French PS, see, in particular, D. S. Bell and B. Criddle (1988), The French Socialist Party: The Emergence of a Party of Government, 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 42–70.
For a short overview on the relations of the French PS with the PCF in the first half of the 1970s, see D. S. Bell (1975) ‘The Parti Socialiste in France’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 13, 4, 419–31, here 421–25.
H. Portelli (1983) ‘Le Parti Socialiste et L’I.S.’, in H. Portelli (ed.), L’Internationale Socialiste, 137–45, here 138.
See, e.g., B. Criddle (1977) ‘The French Parti Socialiste’, in W. E. Paterson and A. H. Thomas (eds), Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe (New York: St. Martin’s Press), 25–57, here 46.
CERES was founded in 1966 by the far left activists Jean-Pierre Chevènement, Alain Gomez and Didier Motchane. For a generic study on the role of CERES within the French PS, broadly covering the 1970s, see D. Hanley (1986) Keeping Left? Ceres and the French Socialist Party. A Contribution to the Study of Fractionalism in Political Parties (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
On the Bagnolet congress, see detailed U. Guérot (1996) Die PS und Europa. Eine Untersuchung der europapolitischen Programmatik der französischen Sozialisten 1971–1995 (Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer), 142ff.
C. Flandre (2006) Socialisme ou social-démocratie? Regards croisés français allemands, 1971–1981 (Paris: Harmattan), 82.
See, e.g., A. Wilkens (2011) ‘Der “Andere Deutsche” im Blick von außen. Zur Perzeption Willy Brandts zu seiner Zeit und in der heutigen Erinnerungskultur’, in B. Rother (ed.), Willy Brandt. Neue Fragen, neue Erkenntnisse (Bonn: Dietz), 54–84, here 54.
See, e.g., P. Merseburger (2002) Willy Brandt 1913–1992, Visionär und Realist (Stuttgart, Munich: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt), 751.
B. Rother (2006) ‘Überwindung des Eurozentrismus. Erinnerungen an Willy Brandts Wahl zum SI-Vorsitzenden’, Die Neue Gesellschaft, 52, 12, 48–51.
See, e.g., A. von Gehlen (2005) Europäisiche Parteiendemokratie? Institutionelle Voraussetzungen und Funktionsbedingungen der europäischen Parteien zur Minderung des Legitimationsdefizits der EU (PhD thesis: Freie Universität Berlin), http://www.gehlen.net/diss/Europaeische_Parteiendemokratie.pdf, date accessed 26 March 2015, 191.
See, e.g., S. Hix and U. Lesse (2002) Shaping a Vision. A History of the European Socialists 1957–2002 (Brussels: Party of European Socialists), 9f.
See, e.g., D. Hanley (2008) Beyond the Nation State. Parties in the Era of European Integration (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 62f.
See, e.g., N. Gresch (1978) Transnationale Parteienzusammenarbeit in der EG (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 95.
James May (1977) ‘Co-operation Between Socialist Parties’, in Paterson and Thomas (eds), Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe, 408–28, here 414.
The decision for first direct elections to the EP gave all western European party families a stimulus for the further development of transnational party cooperation at European level as emphasised, e.g., by G. Pridham and P. Pridham (1981) Transnational Party Co-operation and European Integration. The Process towards Direct Elections (London: Allen & Unwin), 235.
See, e.g., C. Hiepel (2006) ‘ “Europa gehört keiner Partei” Die SPD und der Weg vom Socialist Information and Liaison Office zur Sozialdemokratischen Partei Europas’, in J. Mittag (ed.), Politische Parteien und europäische Integration. Entwicklung und Perspektiven transnationaler Parteienkooperation in Europa (Essen: Klartext-Verlag), 271–88, here 283.
See, e.g., D. Hine (1979) ‘The Italian Socialist Party Under Craxi. Surviving but not Reviving’, Western European Politics, 2, 3, 133–48, here 134.
See S. Lightfoot (2005) Europeanizing Social Democracy? The Rise of the Party of European Socialists, (London: Routledge), 30.
See, e.g., A. H. Thomas (1977) ‘Social Democracy in Denmark’, in Paterson and Thomas (eds), Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe, 234–71, here 257.
See C. Schildberg (2006) ‘Wegbereiter transnationaler Parteienkooperation? Die Rolle der parteinahen Stiftungen’, in Mittag (ed.), Politische Parteien und europäische Integration, 451–75, here 462–72.
S. Bartsch (1998) ‘Politische Stiftungen: Grenzgänger zwischen Gesellschaftsund Staatenwelt’, in K. Kaiser and W.-D. Eberwein (eds), Deutschlands neue Außenpolitik, vol. 4 (Munich: Oldenbourg), 185–98.
M. Pinto-Duschinsky (1991) ‘Foreign Political Aid: The German Political Foundations and Their US Counterparts’, International Affairs, 67, 1, 33–63, here 34.
P. von zur Mühlen (2007) Die internationale Arbeit der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Von den Anfängen bis zum Ende des Ost-West-Konflikts (Bonn: Dietz), 88.
P. von zur Mühlen (2008) ‘Die Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung als internationales Netzwerk’, in B. Unfried, J. Mittag and M. van der Linden (eds), Transnational Netzwerke im 20. Jahrhundert. Historische Erkundungen zu Ideen und Praktiken, Individuen und Organisationen, Transnational Networks in the 20th Century. Ideas and Practices, Individuals and Organizations (Vienna: Akademische Verlagsanstalt), 205–14, here 206.
These three domains still determine the international work of the FES and other German political foundations today, as stressed by Schildberg, ‘Wegbereiter transnationaler Parteienkooperation?’, 454; and D. Dakowska (2009) ‘Networks of Foundations as Norm Entrepreneurs: Between Politics and Policies in EU decision-making’, Journal of Public Policy, 29, 2, 201–21, here 205.
G. Grunwald (1971) ‘Die internationale Arbeit der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’ in Solidarität. Alfred Nau zum 65. Geburtstag (Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft), 117–35, here 120.
For a general overview of the role of German political foundations in EC politics, see also D. Dakowska (2009) ‘Networking of Political Foundations. The Catalytic Effects of Transition and the European Union’s Eastern Enlargement’, in M. Gehler, W. Kaiser and B. Leucht (eds), Netzwerke im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Von 1945 bis zur Gegenwart. Networks in European Multi-Level Governance. From 1945 to the Present (Vienna: Böhlau), 185–200, here 189.
E. Röhrlich (2009) Kreiskys Außenpolitik: Zwischen österreichischer Identität und internationalem Programm (Göttingen: V&R Unipress), 229ff.
H. Berggren (2010) Olof Palme. Vor uns liegen wunderbare Tage. Die Biographie (Munich: btb Verlag), 55.
The group became later known as the Little Stockholm International. On its history, see, in particular, K. Misgeld (1976) Die ‘Internationale Gruppe demokratischer Sozialisten’ in Stockholm 1942–1945: Zur sozialistischen Friedensdiskussion während des Zweiten Weltkriegs (Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft).
See, e.g., P. Secher (1993) Bruno Kreisky. Chancellor of Austria: A Political Biography (Pittsburgh: Dorrance), 66.
On their roles as state actors and/or non-state actors, see also O. Rathkolb (2009) ‘Sozialdemokratische Netzwerke in der europäischen Nahostpolitik. Brandt, Kreisky und Palme als politische Unternehmer’, in Gehler, Kaiser and Leucht (eds), Netzwerke im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Networks in European Multi-Level Governance, 121–37, here 153f.
G. Grass, E. Jäckel and D. Lattmann (eds), (1975) (Demokratischer Sozialismus in Theorie und Praxis) Willy Brandt/Bruno Kreisky/Olof Palme. Briefe und Gespräche 1972–1975 (Cologne: Europäische Verlagsgesellschaft).
See, e.g., A. Wilkens (2005) ‘Willy Brandt, die deutsch-französischen Beziehungen und die Europapolitik (1969–1974)’, in H. Möller and M. Vaïsse (eds), Willy Brandt und Frankreich (Munich: Oldenbourg), 199–214, here 199.
For a recent evaluation of Brandt’s European policy, see the contributions in A. Wilkens (ed.), (2010) Wir sind auf dem richtigen Weg. Willy Brandt und die europäische Einigung (Bonn: Dietz).
C. Hiepel (2004) ‘Willy Brandt, Georges Pompidou und Europa. Das deutsch-französische Tandem in den Jahren 1969–1974’, in F. Knipping and M. Schönwald (eds), Aufbruch zum Europa der zweiten Generation. Die europäische Einigung 1969–1984 (Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag), 28–46, here 32;]
C. Hiepel (2012) Willy Brandt und Georges Pompidou. Deutsche und Französische Europapolitik zwischen Aufbruch und Krise (Munich: Oldenbourg), 319f.
See, e.g., A. Wilkens (2004) ‘Willy Brandt und die europäische Einigung’, in M. König and M. Schulz (eds), Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland und die europäische Einigung 1949–2000 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner), 167–84, here 178ff.
See, e.g., M. Gehler (2014) ‘Bruno Kreisky, European Integration, the German Issue and Transnational Socialist Party Cooperation’, in J. Laursen (ed.), The Institutions and Dynamics of the European Community, 1973–83 (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 243–73.
See M. Gehler and W. Kaiser (1997) ‘A Study in Ambivalence: Austria and European Integration 1945–95’, Contemporary European History, 6, 1, 75–99, here 94.
See A.-M. Ekengren (2011) ‘How Ideas Influence Decision-making. Olof Palme and Swedish Foreign Policy, 1965–1975’, Scandinavian Journal of History, 36, 2, 117–34, here 121f.
S. Gstöhl (2002) Reluctant Europeans. Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland in the Process of Integration (London: Lynne Rienner), 128f.
See, e.g., M. af Malmborg (2000) ‘Sweden’s long road to an agreement with the EEC, 1956–1972’, in M. Gehler and R. Steininger (eds), The Neutrals and the European Integration 1945–1995 (Vienna: Böhlau), 309–336, here 325.
On the European public sphere see, e.g., J.-H. Meyer (2010) The European Public Sphere. Media and Transnational Communication in Europe Integration1969–1991 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner).
See W. Kaiser (2013) ‘Europeanization of Christian Democracy? Negotiating Organisation, Enlargement, Policy and Allegiance in the European People’s Party’, in W. Kaiser and J.-H. Meyer (eds), Societal Actors in European Integration. Polity-Building and Policy-Making 1958–1992 (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 15–37, here 20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Christian Salm
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salm, C. (2016). Formal Weakness and Informal Strength? Transnational Socialist Party Cooperation in European Integration. In: Transnational Socialist Networks in the 1970s. Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137551207_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137551207_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57950-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55120-7
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)