Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements ((PSHSM))

  • 158 Accesses

Abstract

Many observers of today’s European Union (EU) critically evaluate the role of political parties in European governance. The German philosopher Jürgen Habermas, for example, assumes that European citizens misunderstand the relevance of EU politics and policy-making because of the unfulfilled task of political parties at the European level to function as a transmission belt between public opinion in the member states and the policy- and decision-makers in Brussels and Strasbourg. In Habermas’ view, furthermore, the absence of a more structured and visible role of political parties at the European level for creating and guaranteeing such communication constitutes the EU’s democratic deficit.1 In the perception of the public, however, national political parties mainly appear to offer European citizens a better understanding of EU policies. This inevitably raises the question: which roles do political parties at the European level actually perform? And do they have an impact on EU politics and policy-making?

Political parties at European level contribute to forming a European political awareness and to expressing the will of citizens of the Union.

Art. 8 A 4 Treaty of Lisbon (13 December 2007)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, e.g., J. Habermas (2012) The Crisis of the European Union. A Response (Cambridge: Polity Press), 134ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, e.g., D. Hanley (2008) Beyond the Nation State. Parties in the Era of European Integration (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, e.g., S. Hix and C. Lord (1997) Political Parties in the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 17.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. See, e.g., J. Mittag (2009) ‘Europäische Parteien im Wandel’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 23, 42–46, here 42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, in particular, S. Lightfoot (2003) ‘The Party of European Socialists and the Treaty of Amsterdam: Really a Policy-Seeking Party?’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 2, 2, 217–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. On the various functions of national and European-level parties, see J. Mittag and J. Steuwer (2010) Politische Parteien in der EU (Vienna: Facultas Verlag), 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, e.g., G. Pridham and P. Pridham (1981) Transnational Party Co-Operation and European Integration. The Process Towards Direct Elections (London: Allen & Unwin), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Marquand (1978) ‘Towards a Europe of the Parties?’, Political Quarterly, 49, 4, 425–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Faulenbach (2010) Das sozialdemokratische Jahrzehnt. Von der Reformeuphorie zur Neuen Übersichtlichkeit. Die SPD1969–1982 (Bonn: Dietz).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Fourastié (1979) Les trente glorieuses ou la révolution invisible de 1946 à 1975 (Paris: Fayard).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See, e.g., C. S. Maier (2000) ‘Consigning the Twentieth Century to History. Alternative Narratives for the Modern Era’, American Historical Review, 105, 2, 807–31; C. S. Maier (2004) ‘Two Sorts of a Crisis? The “Long” 1970s in the West and the East’, in H. G. Hockerts (ed.), Koordinaten deutscher Geschichte in der Epoche des Ost-West-Konflikts (Munich: Oldenbourg), 49–62; T. Judt (2005) Postwar. A History of Europe since 1945 (New York: Penguin Books), 453ff.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Jarausch (ed.), (2008) Das Ende der Zuversicht? Die siebziger Jahre als Geschichte (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Ferguson (2010) ‘Introduction: Crisis, What Crisis? The 1970s and the Shock of the Global’, in N. Ferguson, C. S. Maier, E. Manela and D. J. Sargent (eds), The Shock of the Global. The 1970s in Perspective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), 1–21;

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Chassaigne (2008) Les années 1970. Fin d’un monde origine de notre modernité (Paris: Armand Colin).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. P. Huntington (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).

    Google Scholar 

  16. On the new social movements in the 1970s, see, e.g., H. Kaelble (2007) Sozialgeschichte Europas. 1945 bis zur Gegenwart (Munich: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung), 306–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, representative for many others, E. Hobsbawm (1994) The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991 (London: Penguin Books), 403ff.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See especially the recent volume of J. Laursen (ed.), (2014) The Institutions and Dynamics of the European Community, 1973–83 (Baden-Baden: Nomos).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The notion of ‘dark ages’ is particularly associated with the older work of the political scientists R. O. Keohane and S. Hoffmann (1991) ‘Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s’, in R. O. Keohane and S. Hoffmann (eds), The New European Community. Decisionmaking and Institutional Change (Boulder: Westview Press), 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For example, D. Dinan (2005) Ever Closer Union. An Introduction to European Integration, 3rd edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 69.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Followed by others, Franz Knipping and Matthias Schönwald were among the first EU historians to paint a rosier picture of EC politics in that period. See F. Knipping and M. Schönwald (2004) Aufbruch zum Europa der zweiten Generation. Die europäische Einigung 1969–1984 (Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Wächter (2009) ‘Eurosclerosis or Europeanisation? European Integration in the 1970s. Introduction’, L’Europe en formation, 50, 3–4, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For a discussion on the historiography of European integration and its shortcomings, see especially W. Kaiser (2006) ‘From State to Society? The Historiography of European Integration’, in M. Cini and A. K. Bourne (eds), Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 190–208;

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. Kaiser (2008) ‘History Meets Politics: Overcoming the Interdisciplinary Volapük in Research on the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 2, 300–13;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Kaiser (2010) ‘From Isolation to Centrality: Contemporary History Meets European Studies’, in W. Kaiser and A. Varsori (eds), European Union History, Themes and Debates (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 45–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. A. S. Milward (1992) The European Rescue of the Nation State (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Gehler, W. Kaiser and B. Leucht (eds), (2009) Netzwerke im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Von 1945 bis zur Gegenwart. Networks in European Multi Level Governance. From 1945 to the Present (Vienna: Böhlau);

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. Kaiser, B. Leucht and M. Gehler (eds), (2010) Transnational Networks in Regional Integration. Governing Europe 1945–83 (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.-H. Meyer (2010) ‘Saving Migrants. A Transnational Network Supporting Supranational Bird Protection Policy in the 1970s’, in Kaiser, Leucht and Gehler (eds), Transnational Networks in Regional Integration, 176–98.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. Kaiser and J.-H. Meyer (eds), (2010) ‘Non-State Actors in European Integration in the 1970s: Towards a Polity of Transnational Contestation’, special issue Comparativ – Zeitschrift für Globalgeschichte und vergleichende Gesellschaftsforschung, 20, 3. This special issue is complemented by a broader study on the role of non-state actors in European integration, although the slightly differing term societal actors is used for this study, also by W. Kaiser and J.-H. Meyer (eds), (2013) Societal Actors in European Integration. Polity-Building and Policy-Making 1958–1992 (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Especially research on political parties for which European issues were internally very decisive – such as the British Labour Party – dominates. See, e.g., M. Broad and O. Daddow (2010) ‘Half-Remembered Quotations from Mostly Forgotten Speeches: The Limits of Labours’ European Policy Discourse’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12, 2, 205–22.

    Google Scholar 

  32. For the socialist parties, such comparative studies have been carried out, e.g., by K. Featherstone (1988) Socialist Parties and European Integration. A Comparative History (Manchester: Manchester University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. T. Griffiths (ed.), (1993) Socialist Parties and the Question of Europe in the 1950s (Leiden: Brill).

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Mittag (ed.), (2006) Politische Parteien und europäische Integration. Entwicklung und Perspektiven transnationaler Parteienkooperation in Europa (Essen: Klartext-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  35. W. Kaiser (2007) Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. O. Rathkolb (2009) ‘Sozialdemokratische Netzwerke in der europäischen Nahostpolitik. Brandt, Kreisky und Palme als politische Unternehmer’, in Gehler, Kaiser and Leucht (eds), Netzwerke im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Networks in European Multi-Level Governance, 121–37.

    Google Scholar 

  37. K. Steinnes (2014) The British Labour Party, Transnational Influences and European Community Membership, 1960–1973 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner).

    Google Scholar 

  38. For example, M. Drögemöller (2008) Zwei Schwestern in Europa. Deutsche und niederländische Sozialdemokratie 1945–1990 (Berlin: Vorwärts Buch);

    Google Scholar 

  39. C. Flandre (2006) Socialisme ou social-démocratie? Regards croisés français allemands, 1971–1981 (Paris: Harmattan).

    Google Scholar 

  40. See, e.g., S. Berger (1994) The British Labour Party and the German Social Democrats, 1900–1931 (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 207–47.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. See also J. Mittag (2006) ‘Chance oder Chimäre? Die grenzüberschreitende Interaktion politischer Parteien in Europa’, in Mittag (ed.), Politische Parteien und europäische Integration, 13–60, here 42.

    Google Scholar 

  42. On the impact of political parties on EU institutions and EU policy fields, see P. Delwit, E. Külahci and C. van den Walle (eds), (2004) The Europarties. Organisations and Influence for the articles by E. Külahci ‘The Party of European Socialists and the Question of Unemployment’, 220–41;

    Google Scholar 

  43. D. Hanley (2004) ‘At the Heart of the Decision-Making Process? The European People’s Party in the European Union’, in P. Delwit, E. Külahci and C. van den Walle (eds), The Europarties. Organisation and Influence, http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235630965_The_Europarties._Organisation_and_Influence, date accessed 26 March 2015, 243–61;

    Google Scholar 

  44. T. Dietz (2004) ‘Do the European Greens Matter? The Problem of Influencing the Decision-making Process in the European Union’, in P. Delwit, E. Külahci and C. van den Walle (eds), The Europarties. Organisation and Influence, http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235630965_The_Europarties._Organisation_and_Influence, date accessed 26 March 2015, 263–85;

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. Faniel and S. Soare (2004) ‘The Influence of the Democratic Party of the People of Europe – European Free Alliance on Decision-Making at European Level’, in P. Delwit, E. Külahci and C. van den Walle (eds), The Europarties. Organisation and Influence, 287–307. This publication is available at http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235630965_The_Europarties._Organisation_and_Influence, date accessed 26 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  46. K. M. Johansson (2002a) ‘Another Road to Maastricht: The Christian Democrat Coalition and the Quest for European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 5, 871–91;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. K. M. Johansson (2002b) ‘Party Elites in Multilevel Europe. The Christian Democrats and the Single European Act’, Party Politics, 8, 4, 423–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. See, in particular, A. Kreppel (2002) The European Parliament and Supranational Party System: A Study in Institutional Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  49. See, e.g., N. Gresch (1978) Transnationale Parteienzusammenarbeit in der EG (Baden-Baden: Nomos);

    Google Scholar 

  50. O. Niedermayer (1983) Europäische Parteien? Zur grenzüberschreitenden Interaktion politischer Parteien im Rahmen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  51. See P. Kenis and V. Schneider (1991) ‘Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox’, in B. Marin and R. Mayntz (eds), Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations (Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag), 25–59, here 27.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See, e.g., K. Heard-Lauréote (2005) ‘Transnational Networks. Informal Governance in the European Political Space’, in W. Kaiser and P. Starie (eds), Transnational European Union. Towards a Common Political Space (London: Routledge), 36–60;

    Google Scholar 

  53. T. Börzel (2009) ‘Informelle Politik in Europa. Regieren in oder durch Netzwerke’, in Gehler, Kaiser and Leucht (eds), Netzwerke im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Networks in European Multi-Level Governance, 27–38. For a general overview on the various definition and application frameworks of policy networks for studying European governance, see T. Börzel (1997) ‘What’s So Special about Policy Networks? – An Exploration of the Concept and Its Usefulness in Studying European Governance’, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997–016a.htm, date accessed 26 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  54. See, especially, R. Rhodes (1990) ‘Policy Networks: A British Perspective’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 3, 293–317;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. F. van Waarden (1991) ‘Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks’, European Journal of Political Research, 21, 1, 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  56. See, e.g., J. P. Olsen (2002) ‘The Many Faces of Europeanization’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 5, 921–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. W. Kaiser, B. Leucht and M. Gehler (2010) ‘Transnational Networks in European Integration Governance: Historical Perspectives on an Elusive Phenomenon’, in Kaiser, Leucht and Gehler (eds), Transnational Networks in Regional Integration, 1–17, here 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Christian Salm

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salm, C. (2016). Introduction. In: Transnational Socialist Networks in the 1970s. Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137551207_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137551207_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57950-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55120-7

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics