Caught in the Crossfire
The First World War is often cited as being ‘the first modern war’, a description which refers to its scale, but also to the weapons used (Strachan 2004: xiv; Gilbert 1983: 423). With over thirty-two countries involved, the war was inherently multilingual, which meant that interpreters and other language coordination services were essential. Armed conflict requires interpreters for intelligence services, for the coordination of troops if the soldiers do not all speak the same language, for communicating with civilians in occupied or besieged territories and for negotiating the end of the war (Baigorri-Jalón 2010: 180).
KeywordsTarget Language Witness Statement Chinese Labourer British Officer German Soldier
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- ‘Aliens in Prohibited Areas’ (1914) The Times, 27 October 1914, p. 9.Google Scholar
- Baigorri-Jalón, Jesús (2000) La interpretación de conferencias: el nacimiento de una profesión, de Paris a Nuremberg, Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
- Baigorri-Jalón, Jesús (2010) ‘War, Languages and the Roles of Interpreters’, in: Henri Awaiss and Jarjoura Hardane (eds), Les liaisons dangereuses: langues, traduction, interprétation, Beirut: University of St Joseph, pp. 173–204.Google Scholar
- ‘Belgian Refugees in England’ (1914) The Register, 10 December 1914, p. 380.Google Scholar
- Bonsal, Stephen (1944) Unfinished Business, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Chielens, Piet, and Dendooven, Dominiek (2008) Wereldoorlog I: Vijf continenten, Tielt: Lannoo.Google Scholar
- Chielens, Piet, Dendooven, Dominiek, and Vanhaelemeersch, Philip (n.d.) ‘Interpreters and Coolies’, http://virtualexhibition.1418remembered.co.uk/zoom-on/in-the-footsteps-of-a-chinese-worker/%E2%80%8Binterpreters-and-coolies.html [accessed 14 August 2014].
- Churchill, Jennie (1916) Women’s War Work, London: C. Arthur Pearson.Google Scholar
- Committee on Alleged German Outrages (1915) Report of the Committee on Alleged German Outrages, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- De Roock, Marcel (n.d.) ‘Historiek van Mater Dei’, http://www.materdei-wzc.be/paginas/historiek/default.html [accessed 12 August 2014].
- Dillon, Emile (1920) The Inside Story of the Peace Conference, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- ‘Ealing: Belgian Refugees’ (1914) The Tablet, 7 November 1914, pp. 64–5.Google Scholar
- ‘England to Play Host to Homeless Belgians’ (1914) Atlanta Constitution, 10 September 1914.Google Scholar
- Fawcett, Brian C (2000) ‘The Chinese Labor Corps in France 1917–1921’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society Hong Kong Branch 40, 33–111.Google Scholar
- Frey, Shirley (2009) ‘The Chinese Labor Corps in the First World War: Forgotten Allies and Political Pawns’, unpublished MA dissertation, University of Texas Arlington.Google Scholar
- Griffin, Nick (1973) ‘The Use of Chinese Labour by the British Army, 1916–1920: The “Raw Importation”, its Scope and Problems’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
- Hankey, Maurice (1946) Diplomacy by Conference, London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
- ‘A Houseless Community of Ursulines’ (1914) The Tablet, 17 October 1914, p. 23.Google Scholar
- Lansing, Robert (1921) The Big Four and Others of the Peace Conference, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Miller, David Hunter (1928) The Drafting of the Covenant, New York: G. P. Putnam’s.Google Scholar
- ‘Nottingham: Ashbourne’ (1920) The Tablet, 24 April 1920, p. 564.Google Scholar
- Read, J. M. (1972) Atrocity Propaganda 1914–1918, New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
- ‘Refugees at Earl’s Court: Escapes from Planes’ (1914) Manchester Guardian, 21 May 1914.Google Scholar
- Roland, Ruth A. (1999) Interpreters as Diplomats: A Diplomatic History of the Role of Interpreters in World Politics, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
- ‘Roosevelt Bars the Hyphenated’ (1915) New York Times, 13 October 1915, p. 1.Google Scholar
- Roudybush, Franklin (1972) Diplomatic Language, Basel: Satz + Repro.Google Scholar
- Seymour, Charles (1928) The Intimate Papers of Colonel House: Into the World War, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Storr, Katherine (2009) Excluded from the Record: Women, Refugees and Relief 1914–1929, Bern: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Strachan, Hew (2004) ‘Preface’, in: Holger H. Herwig (ed.), The First World War: Germany and Austria-Hungary 1914–1918, London: Bloomsbury, pp. xi–xv.Google Scholar
- ‘The Task of Remaking Belgium: Dr. Charles Sarolea, Distinguished Belgian, Declares Plans for Reconstructing his Country must be Thought Out Now’ (1915) New York Times, 4 April 1915, http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9C04E3DB123FE233A25757C0A9629C946496D6CF [accessed 24 April 2014].
- Ursuline Sisters of Tildonk (2012) ‘Our Congregation’, http://www.osutildonk.com/about_us/history/congregation/gregation.html [accessed 12 August 2014].
- Vlotides, Maria (n.d.) ‘The Language of Diplomacy’, http://www.diplomatmagazine.com/index. php?option=com_content&view=article&id=174&Itemid [accessed 24 April 2014].
- ‘We Desire Most Heartily’ (1914) The Spectator, 26 September 1914, p. 3.Google Scholar
- Wilson, Trevor (1986) The Myriad Faces of War, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Wright, Peter E. (1921) At the Supreme War Council, London: Eveleigh Nash Company.Google Scholar