Skip to main content

Resistance to Change

  • Chapter
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

An important perspective on institutions and technology is how they resist change, isolated or in tandem. Categories of institutional change are reviewed together with concepts such as path dependency, technological momentum and increasingly costly reversibility, all capture processes in which material and institutional practices and norms are stable. Resistance to change seems to rely on two fundamental characteristics. In some cases, it can be derived from the costs involved when changing practices or concretely substituting old technologies for new. In others, individual behavior may conserve existing practices, for instance, through conscious reluctance to change or through the force of routine. Most often, however, a combination of the two is the most important prerequisite for resistance to change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. & Walter W. Powell (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review 48: 2, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecours, André, ed. (2005), New Institutionalism: Theory and Practice (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. J. & Stephen E. Margolis (1995), “Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History”, The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 11: 1, 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James (2000), “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology”, Theory and Society 29: 4, 507–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James & Kathleen Thelen, eds. (2010), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergne, Jean-Philippe (2013), “QWERTY Is Dead; Long Live Path Dependency”, Research Policy 42, 1191–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Thomas Kaiserfeld

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaiserfeld, T. (2015). Resistance to Change. In: Beyond Innovation: Technology, Institution and Change as Categories for Social Analysis. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137547125_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics