Abstract
The author analyses the discrimination against women in the boardrooms of the top 50 American companies in 2008, focusing on the human capital attainment of 100 male and 100 female executives. This empirical study draws on the status characteristics theory (SCT), which predicts that for low-status groups (such as women in this case), standards of ability are higher than for high-status group members. That is, for a woman to be perceived as having high ability, she needs to have more evidence of ability than that required by her male counterpart.
This study concludes that gender-based barriers do exist in senior management positions of the chosen companies. The author discusses the reasons for such discrimination, citing corporate practices, behavioural and cultural causes and feminist theories, and relates this to the Indian context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Banerji, Aparna, Mahtani, Shalini, Sealy, Ruth and Vinnicombe, Susan (Sep. 2010). ‘Standard Chartered Bank: Women on corporate boards in India.’ International Centre for Women Leaders, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University. http://www.communitybusiness.org/images/cb/publications/2010/WOB_India.pdf
Bell, Linda A. (Jul. 2005). Women-led firms and the gender gap in top executive jobs. Discussion paper, Institute for the Study of Labour, Discussion Paper Series. IZA DP No. 1689.
Bilimoria, Diana and Piderit, Sandy Kristin (1994). Board committee membership: Effect of sex-based bias. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 6, pp. 1453–1477.
Cassidy, Margaret L. and Warren, Bruce O. (1991). Status consistency and work satisfaction among professional and management women and men. Gender and Society, 5, 2, pp. 193–206.
Catalyst (2007). Double-Bind Dilemma for Women in Leadership: Damned If You Do, Doomed If You Don’t. Catalyst. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/double-bind-dilemma-women-leadership-damned-if-you-do-doomed-if-you-dont-0
Catalyst (2008). Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500. Catalyst. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2008-catalyst-census-women-board-directors-fortune-500
Catalyst (2012). Women on Board. Catalyst. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2012-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors
Catalyst (2013). Women on Board. Catalyst. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2013-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors
Cotter, David A., Hermsen, Joan M., Ovadia, Seth and Vanneman, Reeve (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80, 2, pp. 655–681.
Foschi, Martha (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, pp. 21–42.
Gulhati, Kaval (1990). Attitudes toward women managers: Comparison of attitudes of male and female managers in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 25, 7–8, pp. 41–48.
Hillman, Amy J., Cannella, Albert, Jr, A. and Harris, Ira C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28, 6, pp. 747–763.
Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lazear, E. and Rosen, S. (1990). Male-female wage differentials in job-ladders. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 1, pp. 106–S123.
Ma, Ada (2004). Gender Discrimination-Pay and Promotions in Job Ladders. Department of Economics, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Oakley, Judith G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 4, pp. 321–334.
Pager, Devah and Quillian, Lincoln (2005). Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review, 70, 3, pp. 355–380.
Rosener, J. B. (1995). America’s Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Singh, Val, Terjesen, Siri and Vinnicombe, Susan (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26, pp. 48–58.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Neha Verma
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verma, N. (2015). Gender Discrimination in the Boardroom. In: Kumar, P. (eds) Unveiling Women’s Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137547064_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137547064_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54704-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54706-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)