Animal Enhancement: Technovisionary Paternalism and the Colonisation of Nature
- 3 Citations
- 76 Downloads
Abstract
This chapter reconstructs the debate around animal enhancement and describes what is currently being done in experimental research. It then goes on to show how visions of animal enhancement are currently discussed by their transhumanist advocates. These discussions use the positive rhetorical force of an expression like énhancement’, bypass the practical aspects of what supporting ‘animal enhancement technologies’ concretely means — thus the problem of animal experiments — and rely on general arguments that stress the need to eliminate all the negative sides of ‘nature’. Suggesting a strong form of human-centred paternalism, the animal enhancement project presents ‘nature’ as a last frontier which can be colonised by the human technological enterprise.
Keywords
Nonhuman Animal Human Enhancement Moral Enhancement Enhancement Technology Tail DockingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Birch K. (2008) ‘Neoliberalising bioethics: bias, enhancement and economistic ethics’, Genomics, Society and Policy, 4 (2), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Bostrom N. and Savulescu J. (2009) ‘Human enhancement ethics: the state of the debate’, in Bostrom N. and Savulescu J. (eds), Human Enhancement ( Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press ), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
- Chan S. (2009) ‘Should we enhance animals?’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 678–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Church S.L. (2006) ‘Nuclear transfer saddles up’, Nature Biotechnology, 24, 605–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coenen C. (2010) ‘Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence’, in: Kaiser M., Kurath M., Maasen S. and Rehmann-Sutter C. (eds) Governing Future Technologies: Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime ( Dordrecht: Springer ), pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
- Cooper M. (2008) Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era ( Washington: University of Washington Press).Google Scholar
- Donovan D.M. (2005) ‘Engineering disease resistant cattle’, Transgenic Research, 14 (5), 563–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dvorsky G. (2006) ‘All together now: developmental and ethical considerations for biologically uplifting nonhuman animals’, Journal of Personal Cyberconsciousness, 1 (4), http://web.archive.org/web/20070108172808/http://ieet.org/writings/AllTogetherNow.pdf.
- European Parliament STOA (2009) Human Enhancement Study, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2009/417483/ IPOL-JOIN_ET(20 09) 417483_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
- Ferrari A. (2006) ‘Genetically modified laboratory animals in the name of the 3Rs?’, ALTEX, 23 (4), 294–307.Google Scholar
- Ferrari A. (2008) Genmaus and Co. Gentechnisch veränderte Tiere in der Biomedizin ( Erlangen: Harald Fischer Verlag).Google Scholar
- Ferrari A. (2010) ‘The control nano-freak: multifaceted strategies for taming nature’, in Kjolberg K. and Wickson F. (eds), Nano Meets Macro Social Perspectives on Nano-scaled Sciences and Technologies ( Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing ), pp. 307–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferrari A. (2012a) ‘Animal enhancement: Künftiger Alptraum für Nutztiere?’, http://www.tier-im-fokus.ch/nutztierhaltung/ animal_enhancement/.Google Scholar
- Ferrari A. (2012b) ‘Animal disenhancement for animal welfare: the apparent philosophical conundrums and the real exploitation of animals. A response to Thompson and Palmer’, Nanoethics, 6, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferrari A. (2013) ‘Zwischen Tierschutz und Ausbeutung: Animal Enhancement als Herrschaftsprojekt’, in Rippe K.-P. and Thurnherr U. (Hrsg.), Tierisch Menschlich. Beiträge zur Tierphilosophie und Tierethik ( Erlangen: Harald Fischer ), pp. 97–114.Google Scholar
- Ferrari A., Coenen C., Grunwald A. and Sauter A. (2010) Animal Enhancement. Neue technische Möglichkeiten und ethische Fragen ( Bern: Bundesamt für Bauten und Logistik BBL ), http://www.ekah.admin.ch/fileadmin/ekah-dateien/dokumentation/publikationen/EKAH_Animal_Enhancement_Inh_web_V19822.pdf.Google Scholar
- Forsberg C.W. et al. (2003) ‘The Enviropig physiology, performance, and contribution to nutrient management, advances in a regulated environment: the leading edge of change in the pork industry’, Journal of Animal Science, 81 (14 Suppl. 2), E68–77.Google Scholar
- Fox M. (2010) ‘Taking dogs seriously?’, Law, Culture and the Humanities, 6 (1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galli C. et al. (2003) ‘Pregnancy: a cloned horse born to its dam twin’, Nature, 424, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galli C. et al. (2008) ‘Somatic cell nuclear transfer in horses’, Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 43 (Suppl. s2), 331–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Golovan S.P., Meidinger R.G., Ajakaiye A., Cottrill M., Wiederkehr M.Z., Barney D.J., Plante C., Pollard J.W., Fan M.Z., Hayes M.A., Laursen J., Hjorth J.P., Hacker R.R., Phillips J.P. and Forsberg C.W. (2001) ‘Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low-phosphorus manure’, Nat. Biotechnol., 19, 741–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottlieb S. and Wheeler M.B. (2008) Genetically Engineered Animals and Public Health: Compelling Benefits for Health Care, Nutrition, the Environment, and Animal Welfare (Washington DC: Biotechnology Industry Organization), http://www.bio.org/foodag/animals/ ge_animal_benefits.pdf.Google Scholar
- Gruen L. (2011) Ethics and Animals: An Introduction ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harris J. (2007) Enhancing Evolution ( Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
- Harvey D. (2007) A Brief History of Neoliberalism ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
- Henschke A. (2012) ‘Making sense of animal disenhancement’, Nanoethics, 6 (1), 41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hubrecht R. (1995) ‘The welfare of dogs in human care’, in Serpell J. (ed.), The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interventions with People ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 179–98.Google Scholar
- Hughes J. (2004) Citizen Cyborg. Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future ( Cambridge: Westview Press).Google Scholar
- Kimmelmann B. (1983) ‘The American Breeders’ Association: Genetics and Eugenics in an Agricultural Context, 1903–1913’, Social Studies of Science, 13, 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kues W.A. and Niemann H. (2011) ‘Advances in farm animal transgenesis’, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 102, 146–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lebedev M.A. and Nicolelis M.A. (2006) ‘Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future’, Trends in Neuroscience, 29 (9), 536–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lehrer J. (2009) ‘Neuroscience: small, furry… and smart’, Nature, 461 (7266), 862–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lenk C. (2002) Therapie und Enhancement. Ziele und Grenzen der modernen Medizin ( Berlin: Springer).Google Scholar
- Liao S.M., Sandberg A., Roache R. (2012) ‘Human Engineering and Climate Change’, Ethics, Policy and Environment, 15(2). 206–221. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2012.685574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lush J.L. (1937) Animal breeding plans ( Ames: Iowa State College Press).Google Scholar
- Lyons L.A. (2010) ‘Feline genetics: clinical applications and genetic testing’, Topics in Companion Animal Medicine, 25 (4), 203–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Macchiarini F. et al. (2005) ‘Humanized mice: are we there yet?’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, 21, 202(10), 1307–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maga E.A., Shoemaker C.F., Rowe J.D. et al. (2006) ‘Production and processing of milk from transgenic goats expressing human lysozyme in the mammary gland’, Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 518–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mamiya T., Yamada K., Miyamoto Y. et al. (2003) ‘Neuronal mechanism of nociceptin-induced modulation of learning and memory: involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors’, Molecular Psychiatry, 8 (8), 752–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meyers-Wallen V.N. (2003) ‘Ethics and genetic selection in purebred dogs’, Reproduction of Domestic Animals, 38, 73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palmer C. (2011) ‘Animal disenhancement and the non-identity problem: a response to Thompson’, Nanoethics, 5, 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Panarace M. et al. (2007) ‘How healthy are clones and their progeny: 5 years of field experience’, Theriogenology, 67, 142–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pearce D. (2007) ‘The abolitionist project. Text adapted from invited talks given at the Future of Humanity Institute (Oxford University) and the Charity International Happiness Conference’, http://www.abolitionist.com/.Google Scholar
- Pearce D. (2011) ‘Transhumanism 2011. Interview with David Pearce’, Manniska Plus, http://www.hedweb.com/transhumanism/overview2011.html.Google Scholar
- Persson I., Savulescu J. (2012) Unfit for the Future. The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- President’s Council on Bioethics (2003) Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness ( Washington DC: The President’s Council on Bioethics ), http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/beyondtherapy/beyond_therapy_final_webcorrected.pdf.Google Scholar
- Rathbone M. and Brayden D. (2009) ‘Controlled release drug delivery in farmed animals: commercial challenges and academic opportunities’, Current Drug Delivery, 6 (4), 383–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raven P.G. (2011) Uplift ethics and transhuman hubris, http://futurismic.com/2011/07/26/uplift-ethics-and-transhumanhubis/?utm_source=feedburnerandutm_medium=feedandutm_campaign=Feed%3A+futurismic_feed+%28Futurismic+-+the+fact+and+fiction+of+tomorrow%29.Google Scholar
- Roco M. and Bainbridge W. (eds) (2002) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Technology, NSF/DOC-sponsored report (Arlington: World Technology Evaluation Center), http://wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/1/NBIC_report.pdf.Google Scholar
- Rollin, B.E. (1995) The Frankenstein Syndrome. Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Savulescu J. (2011) ‘Genetically modified animals: should there be limits to engineering the animal kingdom?’, in Beauchamp T. and Frey R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), pp. 641–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaffer M. (2009) One Nation under Dog ( New York: Henry Holt and Co.).Google Scholar
- Schultz-Bergin M. (2014) ‘Making better sense of animal disenhancement: A reply to Henschke’, Nanoethics, 8, 101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singer (2011) Practical Ethics, 3rd edn ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steinfield H. et al. (eds) (2006) Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options ( Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation ), http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.htm.Google Scholar
- Talwar S.K. et al. (2002) ‘Behavioural neuroscience: rat navigation guided by remote control’, Nature, 417, 37–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tang Y., Shimizu E., Dube G.R. et al. (1999) ‘Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice’, Nature, 401 (6748), 63–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson P. (2008) ‘The opposite of enhancement: nanotechnology and the blind chicken problem’, Nanoethics, 2, 305–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wall R.J., Powell A.M., Paape M.J. et al. (2005) ‘Genetically enhanced cows resist intramammary Staphylococcus aureus infection’, Nature Biotechnology, 23, 445–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wolbring G. (2008) ‘Why NBIC? Why human performance enhancement?’, 21, Innovation; The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wolbring G. (2009) ‘Die Konvergenz der Governance von Wissenschaft und Technik mit der Governance des “Ableism”’, Technikfolgenabschätzung–Theorie und Praxis, 2 (18), 29–35.Google Scholar
- Wolbring G. (2010) ‘Human enhancement through the ableism lens’, Dilemata, 3, http://www.dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/31/46.Google Scholar
- Young L. (2009) ‘Pet economy: meet the fur babies’, Telegraph.co.uk, 5 November, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/petshealth/6507575/Pet-economy-meet-the-fur-babies.html.Google Scholar