Skip to main content

Engaging Learner Diversity through Learning by Design

  • Chapter
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies
  • 2335 Accesses

Abstract

Diversity is a key issue in education not only because of ongoing inequalities in student learning outcomes, but also because of the importance of supporting each individual to reach his/her potential to contribute to individual well-being, social cohesion and national economic prosperity. This chapter focuses on how the Learning by Design pedagogy addresses diversity in two Australian high school classrooms. Through interviews with students and teachers, and analysis of student work samples and teachers’ learning designs, key factors that address diversity are identified. These include incorporating students’ lifeworlds and their individual attributes in learning designs, scaffolding learning, creating student agency, including challenge and intellectual quality, and providing a meta-language for students to participate in their learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amosa, W., Ladwig, J., Griffiths, T., & Gore, J. (2007). Equity Effects of Quality Teaching: Closing the Gap. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education conference, Fremantle, 25–29 November. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2007/gor07285.pdf.

  • Apple, M. (2006). Foreword. In D. Hayes, M. Mills, P. Christie & B. Lingard (Eds.), Teachers and Schooling Making a Difference (pp. v–xii). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Capital Territory Government (2006). Every Chance to Learn: Curriculum framework for ACT schools. Canberra: ACT Department of Education and Training. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://activated.act.edu.au/ectl/resources/ECTL_Framework.pdf .

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council for Educational Research & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2000). PISA in Brief from Australia’s perspective: Highlights from the full Australian report. Camberwell, VIC: ACER. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://www.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Department of Education, Science & Training (2006). Teaching Reading. Canberra: DEST. Retrieved March 20, 2015 from http://research.acer.edu.au/tll_misc/5/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B. & Rolheiser, C. (2001). Beyond Monet. Toronto: Bookation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R.B. (2000). Introduction to Research Methods (4th ed.). French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloonan, A. (2007). The Professional Learning of Teachers: A Case study of Multiliteracies Teaching in the Early Years of Schooling. Melbourne, VIC: School of Education, RMIT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B. & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B. & Kamler, B. (Eds). (2005). Turn-Around Pedagogies: Literacy Interventions for At-Risk Students. Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds). (2000.) Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. South Yarra, VIC: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R.M. (2001). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland. (2001). The Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study. Brisbane, QLD: School of Education, University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Reference. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P. (2000). New people in new worlds. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 43–68). South Yarra, VIC: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P. (2004). Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P. (2007). What Video Games have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.H. (2006). A New Shape for Schooling. London: Specialist Schools and Academies Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P. & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and Schooling Making a Difference. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. (2006). Changing subjectivities, new learning. Pedagogies, 1(1), 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2012a). Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2012b). New Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B. & Harvey, A. (2003). Toward diversity in education. In S. Dinham (Ed.), Transforming Education: Engaging with Complexity and Diversity (pp. 24–36). Deakin, VIC: Australian College of Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B. & Learning by Design Project Group. (2005). Learning by Design. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission and Common Ground.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig, J. (2005). Monitoring the quality of pedagogy. Leading & Managing, 11(2), 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Cazden, C.B., Lin, A. & Freebody, P. (2003). The Singapore Classroom Coding Scheme: Technical Report. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, H. & Noble, T. (1998). Seven Ways at Once. South Melbourne, VIC: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. (2006). Multiliteracies: A Critical Ethnography. Brisbane, QLD: School of Education, Queensland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E. & Alexander, L. (1995). In Depth Interviewing. French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Education/Addison Wesley Longmans Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, M. (2008). Teaching Multimodal Literacy using the Learning by Design Approach to Pedagogy. Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne University Press and Common Ground.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 9–38). South Yarra, VIC: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. (Ed.) (1996). Authentic Assessment: Restructuring Schools for Intellectual Quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raison, G. (2003). A Cooperative Approach to Assisting Readers Experiencing Reading Difficulties. Perth, WA: School of Education, Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (2010). The Death and Life of the Great American School System. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., Matusov, B. & White, S. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. Olson and N. Torrance (Eds.), The Handbook of Cognition and Human Development (pp. 388–414). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M. & La Guardia, J.G. (1999). Achievement motivation within a pressured society: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to learn and the politics of school reform. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (pp. 45–88). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, R.W., Silver, H.F. & Perini, M.J. (2001). Teaching What Matters Most: Standards and Strategies for Raising Student Achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suominen, K. (2009) Students Learning by Design: A Study on the Impact of Learning by Design on Student Learning. Melbourne, VIC: School of Education, RMIT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, D. (2013). Race to the top and leave the children behind. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., Cresswell, J. & De Bortoli, L. (2003). PISA in Brief from Australia’s Perspective: Highlights from the Full Australian Report. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://www.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/reports

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S. & De Bortoli, L. (2008). PISA in Brief: from Australia’s Perspective. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://www.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L. & Buckley, S. (2012). PISA 2012: How Australia Measures Up. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://www.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government Department for Education. (2010). The Importance of Teaching. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-importance-of-teaching-the-schools-white-paper-2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education (2001). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=rn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Haren, R. (2005). Effective teaching and learning: Pedagogy and multiliteracies. In M. Kalantzis, B. Cope & Learning by Design Project Group (Eds.), Learning by Design (pp. 257–284). Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission and Common Ground.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, J.D. (2007). Meeting the challenge: Creating engaging and powerful contexts for literacy learning. English in Australia, 42(1), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Rita van Haren

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Haren, R. (2015). Engaging Learner Diversity through Learning by Design. In: Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (eds) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics