Skip to main content

Learning by Design: Reconstructing Knowledge Processes in Teaching and Learning Practices

  • Chapter
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies

Abstract

This chapter discusses the ‘learning by design’ concept of the Pedagogy of Multiliteracies in a Brazilian project. It first contextualizes the arrival of the literacies/multiliteracies/new learning ideas in Brazilian schools and academia. This came at an opportune moment, after the ‘years of lead’ of the dictatorship. In the Brazilian context, Paulo Freire’s ideas had in the 1960s brought new insights and new breath to education in Brazil. These were — in terms of a nationwide public education program — somewhat invisible in the 1960s but rescued in the late 1980s and beginning of the 1990s. Much discussion about the suitability of particular literacy approaches has gained academic focus since then. The Multiliteracies/new learning proposals have found resonance in Brazil, in view of their affinity with debates that had been disseminated by Freire a few decades before. The Multiliteracies/new literacies founding theories have enabled a reconfiguration of those studies in the face of a new socio-historic movement in Brazil and abroad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brockmeier, J. (1996). Explaining the interpretive mind. Human Development, 39, 287, 295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1997). Realidade mental, mundos possíveis. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Ed. Artes Médicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1999). A Sociedade em Rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C., Lin, A., Luke, A. & Freebody, P. (2004). The Singapore Classroom Coding System. Technical Report. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, J. (1994). Paulo Freire: Pedagogue of Liberation. New York: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated Language and Learning. New York, London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2013). The Anti-Education Era. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. & Hayes, E.R. (2011). Language and Learning in the Digital Age. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1981). Twisted tales; or, story, study and symphony. In W. J. T. Mitchel (Org.), On Narrative (pp. 99–116). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. & Watt I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. Contemporary Studies in Society and History, 5:304–45. Republished in J. Goody, (ed.) (1968). Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. (2012). Paulo Freire’s Philosophy of Education: Origins, Developments, Impacts and Legacies. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2008). New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. Cambridge, MA, New York, NY, Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Reading as Semiosis: Interpreting the World and Ordering the World. In Literacy in the New Media Age. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. England and New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2008). Knowledge and Learning in New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. Cambridge, UK, New York and Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2011). Literacies: Social, Cultural and Historical Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2004). Two takes on the Critical. In B. Norton and K. Toohey (Eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning (p. 21–29). Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Freebody, P., Cazden, C. & Lin, A. (2004). Singapore Pedagogy Coding Scheme. Technical Report. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Woods, A. & Weir, K. (2013). Curriculum, Syllabus Design and Equity: A Primer and Model. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muspratt, S., Luke, A. & Freebody, P. (1997) Constructing Critical Literacies. Teaching and Learning Textual Practice. St Leonards, UK: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New London Group (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Designing social futures. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds), Multiliteracies. Literacy Learning and the Design of Socialf Futures. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1994). The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. G. (Eds) (1991). Literacy and Orality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative, Volume 3. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, Brian V. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5, 2, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality. In J. Simpson (ed.) The Routledge Handbook in Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Walkyria Monte Mór

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mór, W.M. (2015). Learning by Design: Reconstructing Knowledge Processes in Teaching and Learning Practices. In: Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (eds) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics