Skip to main content

The Necessity of an Absolute Misunderstanding: Why Hegel Has So Many Misreaders

  • Chapter
Slavoj Žižek and Dialectical Materialism

Abstract

What stands out about Hegel as a philosopher is the confusion that surrounds his most basic positions. No other philosopher in the Western tradition occasions such wild divergence with regard to the principal concerns of her or his philosophy, and the competition is not even close. To capture the immensity of the divergence of opinion concerning Hegel, one would have to imagine some readers of Marx seeing him as a champion of the capitalist system rather than its foremost opponent or envision psychoanalysts conceiving of Freud as an advocate of repression rather than its diagnostician. Though there is disagreement over the details of the philosophies of Marx, Freud, and most other major thinkers, a general agreement exists concerning the fundamental principles. The same cannot be said in the case of Hegel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aristotle, “Metaphysics,” trans. W. D. Ross, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2, ed. Jonathan Barnes (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebecca Comay, Mourning Sickness: Hegel and the French Revolution (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel DeLanda, A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (New York: Bloomsbury, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund Freud, “Instincts and Their Vicissitudes,” trans. James Strachey, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 14, ed. James Strachey (London: Hogarth Press, 1957), 109–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. W. F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. W. F. Hegel, Lectures on the Philosophy of World History, Volume I: Manuscripts of the Introduction and Lectures of 1822–3, eds. and trans. Robert F. Brown and Peter C. Hodgson (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. W. F. Hegel, The Science of Logic, trans. George Di Giovanni (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, and Dialectic, trans. Lisabeth During (New York: Routledge, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Singer, Hegel, in Roger Scruton, Peter Singer, Christopher Janaway, and Michael Tanner, German Philosophers (Oxford: Oxford University, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Wahl, Le Malheur de la conscience dans la philosophie de Hegel, 2nd ed. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavoj Žižek, Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism (London: Verso, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavoj Žižek, Absolute Recoil: Towards a New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism (London: Verso, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Agon Hamza Frank Ruda

Copyright information

© 2016 Todd McGowan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGowan, T. (2016). The Necessity of an Absolute Misunderstanding: Why Hegel Has So Many Misreaders. In: Hamza, A., Ruda, F. (eds) Slavoj Žižek and Dialectical Materialism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538611_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics