Abstract
The recent “discursive” turn in social and human sciences has not passed without leaving its mark upon our capacity to submit our research objects to critical inquiry.1 Discourse theories based upon the works of Michel Foucault and Ernesto Laclau have not only declared that social subjects’ conceptions of the world reflect their discourse-constituting epistemic horizons, but also rejected the possibility of discourses reflecting any exo-or extra-discursive character or constitution of the world (cf. Foucault, 1991; Laclau and Mouffe, 1990). The discursive constitution of any socially meaningful practice means that not only social, political, religious, and cultural practices, but also scientific practices, such as critical inquiry, are contingent on their capability to rationalize and define discourses. The “hyperdiscursive” (Miklitsch, 1995) constitution of the world is the logical consequence of the post-foundational ontological position that rejects the possibility of retracing the presence and character of particular objects of knowledge to any “ultimate ontological ground” (Sparke, 2005, p. xxxv). This situation, which Marchart (2007a, p. 9) described as the “post-foundational condition”, has considerable implications for the practice of critical inquiry, which is now unmasked as still another contingent and socially contestable claim to truth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2016 Tomas Marttila
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gengnagel, V. (2016). Critical Potential of Discourse Analysis. In: Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538406_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538406_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53839-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53840-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)