Advertisement

An Emancipated Worker

  • Yadullah Shahibzadeh

Abstract

Before the 1979 Revolution, Iranian intellectuals believed that they possessed the emancipatory knowledge the working class and the exploited required in their struggle for emancipation. Al-e Ahmad and Shariati were among the most enthusiastic intellectuals who tried to bring their possessed knowledge to the working class and the exploited. Their lectures, books, and pamphlets were the means through which they attempted to produce knowledge about the socio-cultural and political situation in Iran and bring it to the people who were entrapped in the situation. Others, such as the founders of the Mojahedin and Fadaiyan, believed that the Shah’s regime was aware of the potential influence of the intellectuals on the working class and the poor. Thus, it would not let the intellectuals mingle with the masses and working class. Iranian intellectuals started the armed uprisings to make themselves known to the working class. Regardless of their methods, the Iranian intellectuals thought that the oppressed people needed their knowledge, since they lacked the intellectual capacity to educate themselves. The oppressed classes needed them because they possessed both an explanation of the social reality and had a vision for the future. What they disregarded was the intellectual capacity of the individual members of the oppressed classes to understand and change their own situation.

Keywords

Ordinary People Foreign Affair Local Branch Iranian Society Armed Struggle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Quentin Skinner, Liberty Before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), p.112.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Ahmad Mahmoud, Madar-e sefr darajeh, Volume I (Tehran: Entesharat-e Mo’in, 1376/1997), pp.116–118.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Ali Shariati, Bazgasht (Tehran: Elham, 2000), p.290.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Masoud Ahmadzadeh, Mobarezeh-ye mosalahaneh, ham strategi ham taktik, (Cherikha-ye Fadaiy-e Khalgh-e Iran, 1981). p.39.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Jacques Rancière, The Empancipated Spectator (London: Verso Books, 2009), p.17–18.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Louis Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (London: New Left Books, 1971), p.155.Google Scholar
  7. 18.
    Jalal Al-e Ahmad, Gozareshi az Khuzestan, Arash, Shomareh-ye 11, Tabestan-e 1345/Summer 1966.Google Scholar
  8. And Ali Shariati, Bazgasht, Majmueh-ye asar 4 (Tehran: Bonyad-e farhangi-e Ali Shariati, 2000), pp.301–305.Google Scholar
  9. 21.
    Oliver Davis, Jacques Rancière (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010), pp.65–66.Google Scholar
  10. 22.
    Kamran Talattof, The Politics of Writing in Iran: A History of Modern Persian Literature (New York: Syracuse University Press, 2000), p.80.Google Scholar
  11. 29.
    Sarak Eta, Babak Eta, Siamak Eta, Didar ba Ahmad Mahmoud (Tehran: Moin, 2005), pp.23–24.Google Scholar
  12. 32.
    Abbas Milani, The Shah (New York: Palgrabe MacMillan, 2012), pp.439–440.Google Scholar
  13. 39.
    Ardeshir Avanesian, Safahati chand az jonbesh-e kargari va komunisti dar douran-e avval saltanat-e Reza Shah (1922–1933), (Bongah-e nashriyat-e hezb-e Tudeh 1979), p.75.Google Scholar
  14. 42.
    Mohammad Jafari (Qanavati), Sali-doumah: Hekayat-e az khod biganegi, Mahnameh-ye Farhangi-honari kelk Khordad 1380 (May–June 2001), Shomareh-ye 125, pp.16–18.Google Scholar
  15. 43.
    Mohammad Baharlou, Sali-doumah in Hekayat-e an keh ba bad raft (Tehran: Muaseseh-ye farhangi honari-ye nouruz-e honar, 1379/2000).Google Scholar
  16. 46.
    Jaques Rancière, On the Shore of Politics, (London: Verso, 1995), p.45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Yadullah Shahibzadeh 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yadullah Shahibzadeh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations