Advertisement

Abstract

Bernard Lewis offered, in the late 1980s, a survey of what he calls the primordial Political Language of Islam that determined both the leadership of the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the nature of the post-revolutionary state. 1 Lewis sees essential differences between this political language and the languages of the French and Russian Revolutions.2 He selects a series of concepts used during the Iranian Revolution, identifies their origins in the Islamic sources, and calls them the political language of Islam. What Lewis totally ignores is that the meanings that these concepts communicated and the references they provided were radically different from the original ones, but in line with the languages of these modern revolutions. 3 In fact, the language of the Iranian Revolution emerged from the Iranian political language, of which Lewis seems quite unaware. Lewis seems unfamiliar with or reluctant to deal with the real contents and meaning of the revolutionary language. In fact, Lewis reflects the general academic reluctance to take the Iranian political language seriously. Since the late nineteenth century, this language has enabled the elites and ordinary people to make their thoughts and actions meaningful to one another. The history of the formation and transformation of this language is a history of the Iranian people who have shaped and reshaped the Iranian public sphere as the space of their intellectual and political experience. Similar to any other language, this language has an arbitrary nature. It does not entirely determine or limit the ways the intellectual and political subjects think and act, but presents a possibility that can be used by anyone and everyone. It constitutes a linguistic space that enables the Iranian people to reinvent themselves, intellectually and politically, at different historical junctions.

Keywords

Public Sphere Political Culture Ordinary People Social History Body Politic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Bernard Lewis, The Political Language of Islam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), p.1.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Ervand Abrahamian, Radical Islam: The Iranian Mojahedin (London: I. B. Tauris, 1989), p.96.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Pierre Rosanvallon, Pour une Histoire Conceptuelle du Politique (Paris: Seuil, 2003), pp.29–30.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Daryush Shayegan, Cultural Schizophrenia: Islamic Societies Confronting the West (London: Saqi Books, 1992), pp.9–10.Google Scholar
  5. Hamid Dabashi, Theology of Discontent: The Ideological Foundation of The Islamic Revolution in Iran (New York: New York University Press, 1993), p.14.Google Scholar
  6. Mehrzad Boroujerdi, Iranian Intellectuals and the West: The Tormented Triumph of Nativism (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1996), pp.12–19.Google Scholar
  7. Ali Mirsepassi, Intellectual Discourse and the Politics of Modernization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp.122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970), p.34.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Louis Althusser, Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (London: Monthly Review Press, 1971).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Michel Foucault: L’Ordre du Discours (Paris: Galimard, 1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Massacussets: Harvard University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
  12. and Pierre Bourdieu, Sociology in Question (London: Sage, 1993).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Charles Bingham and Gert J.J. Biesta, with Jacques Rancière, Jacques Rancière: Education, Truth, Emancipation (New York, Continuum, 2010), pp.149–150.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Bernard Lewis, What Went Wrong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp.158–159.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Hamid Dabashi, Iran: a People Interrupted (New York : New Press, 2007), p.9.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Hamid Dabashi, Theology of Discontent: The Ideological Foundation of the Iranian Revolution, (New York: New York University Press, 1993), p.493.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Sami K. Farsoun and Mehrdad Mashayekhi (eds), Iran: Political Culture in the Islamic Republic (New York: Routledge, 1992 ), pp.7–11.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 21.
    Walter A. Rosenbaum, Political Culture (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1975), p.37.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    Stephen Welch, The Concept of Political Culture (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993), p.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 26.
    Thomas Schmitz, Modern Literary Theory and Ancient Texts (Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2007), p.188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 27.
    Jacques Rancière, The Names of Histor:, On the Poetics of Knowledge (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1994), p.97.Google Scholar
  23. 33.
    From Jules Michelet’s Précis de L’Histoire Moderne (1827) to his Histoire de France (1855).Google Scholar
  24. 37.
    Hayden White, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (London: John Hopkins University Press, 1973), pp.5–38.Google Scholar
  25. 41.
    Fouad Ajami, The Arab Predicament: Arab Political Thought and Practice Since 1967 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  26. Lewis Bernard, What Went Wrong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  27. 45.
    Sadeq Zibakalam, Ma cheguneh ma shodim: risheh’yabi-ye elal-e aqab-mandegi dar Iran (Tehran: Ruzaneh, 1999)Google Scholar
  28. and Javad Tabatabayi, Zavale andisheh-ye siyasi dar Iran (Tehran: Entesharat-e Kavir, 1373/1994)Google Scholar
  29. and Ibne Kholdon va olum-e ejtemaei, vaziyat-e olume ejtemaei dar tamaddon eslami (Tehran: Tarh-e nou, 1374/1995).Google Scholar
  30. 46.
    Abbas Milani, The Shah (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012).Google Scholar
  31. 47.
    Mohamad Tavak oli-Targhi, Refashioning Iran: Orientalism, Occidentalism, and Hisoriograpgy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001), p.ix–x).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 49.
    Touraj Atabaki, Time, Labour-Discipline and Modernization in Turkey and Iran: Some Comparative Remarks in The State and The Subaltern: Modernization, Society and the State in Turkey and Iran, Edited by Touraj Atabaki (London: I. B. Tauris, 2007), pp.1–16.Google Scholar
  33. and From Amaleh (Labor) to Karegar (Worker): Recruitment, Work Discipline and Making of the Working Class in Persian/Iranian Oil Industry in International Labor and Working-Class History, Volume 84, Fall 2013, pp.159–175.Google Scholar
  34. 50.
    Ibid., and Touraj Atabaki, Disgrunteled Guests: Iranian Subalterns on the Margins of the Tsarist Empire in The State and the Subaltern: Modernization, Society and the State in Turkey and Iran (London: I. B. Tauris, 2007), pp.31–52.Google Scholar
  35. 52.
    Jacque Rancière, D issensus: O n Politics and Aesthetics (London: Continuum, 2010), p.30.Google Scholar
  36. 53.
    Jean-Philippe Deranty (ed), Jacque Rancière: Key Concepts (Durham, NC: Acumen, 2010), p.63.Google Scholar
  37. 55.
    Rancière, La Nuit Des Prolétaires (Paris: Fayard, 1983), p.8.Google Scholar
  38. 56.
    Rancière, On the Shore of Politics London: Verso, 1995), p.45.Google Scholar
  39. 60.
    Rancière, Disagreement (Minneapolis, The University of Minnesota Press, 1999), p.26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Yadullah Shahibzadeh 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yadullah Shahibzadeh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations