Advertisement

Financing Firms’ Networks: The Italian Case

  • Elisa Giaretta
  • Giusy Chesini
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions book series (SBFI)

Abstract

The recent financial crisis has highlighted that enterprises, in particular small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), need to become more competitive, to expand internationally and to have access to new funding channels.

Keywords

Current Ratio Industrial District Solvency Ratio Liquidity Index Liquidity Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agenziadelle delle entrate (2011) Protocol no. 2011/81521.Google Scholar
  2. Basel II (2004) International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, Revised International Capital Framework (Basel: BIS).Google Scholar
  3. Becattini, G. (1979) ‘Dal settore industriale al distretto industriale: alcune considerazioni sull’unità di indagine dell’economia industriale’, Rivista di Economia e Politica Industriale, 5(1): 7–21.Google Scholar
  4. Becattini, G. (1987), Mercato e forze locali: il distretto industriale, (Bologna: il Mulino).Google Scholar
  5. Bentivogli, C., F. Quintiliani, and D. Sabbatini (2013) ‘The network contract’, Bank of Italy Occasional Paper, No. 152.Google Scholar
  6. Boari, C. (2007) ‘Reti e relazioni tra imprese’ in Andrea Lipparini (ed.) Economia e gestione delle imprese, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
  7. Calaggi, F. and Iamiceli, P. (2007) Reti di imprese tra crescita e innovazione organizzativa (Bologna: il Mulino).Google Scholar
  8. Camere di Commercio d’ltalia (2013), InfoCamere database, consulted in November 2013.Google Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press).Google Scholar
  10. Cooke, P. (2001) ‘Clusters as key determinants of economic growth: the example of biotechnology’ in A. Mariussen (ed.) Cluster Policies — Cluster Development? Stockholm: Nordriego.Google Scholar
  11. Cooke, P., and Huggins, R. (2004) ‘A tale of two clusters: high technology industries in Cambridge’, International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 2(2): 112–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortright, J. (2006) ‘Making sense of clusters: regional competitiveness and economic development’, available at http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2006/03/cities-cortright.Google Scholar
  13. D’Aspremont, C., and Jacquemin, A. (1988) ‘Cooperative and noncooperative R and D in duopoly with spillovers’, The American Economic Review, 78(5): 1133–37.Google Scholar
  14. European Investment Bank (2012), Italia growth reti d’impresa. Retrieved from http://www.eib.org/projects/pipeline/2013/20130286.htm [online] Accessed 15 Jun. 2015].Google Scholar
  15. EU Commission Decision on State Aid to Broadband no. 01/2011.Google Scholar
  16. EU Commission Decision no. 2012/80186 of 14 June 2012.Google Scholar
  17. European Charter for Small Enterprises (2008) ‘A small business act for Europe’, Commission Communication of 25 June 2008, Commission of European Union.Google Scholar
  18. Foresti, G. (2012) ‘Prime evidenze sui contratti di rete in Italia’, Economia e Politica Industriale, (2): 193–204.Google Scholar
  19. Huggins, R. (2008) ‘The evolution of knowledge clusters progress and policy’, Economic Development Quarterly, 22(4): 277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huggins, R., and A. Johnston (2009) ‘Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region: SME innovation and growth’, Growth and Change, 40(2): 227–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iandoli, L., E. Marchione, C. Ponsiglione, and G. Zollo (2013) ‘Learning and structural properties in small firms’ networks: a computational agent-based model’, Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, 1(1): 5–17.Google Scholar
  22. Italian Circular no. 4/E of 12 February 2011.Google Scholar
  23. Italian Circular no. 15/E of 14 April 2011.Google Scholar
  24. Italian Circular no. 20/E — 18 June 2013.Google Scholar
  25. Italian Law no. 266/2005 of 23 December 2005 (‘Legge Finanziaria 2006’).Google Scholar
  26. Italian Legislative Decree no. 276/2003 (‘Riforma Biagi’), converted into Italian Law no. 30/2003.Google Scholar
  27. Italian Legislative Decree no. 5/2009, converted into Italian Law no. 33/2009.Google Scholar
  28. Italian Legislative Decree no. 78/2010, converted into Italian Law no. 122/2010.Google Scholar
  29. Italian Legislative Decree no. 83/2012 (‘Decreto sviluppo’), converted into Italian Law no. 134/2012.Google Scholar
  30. Italian Legislative Decree no. 179/2012 (‘Decreto sviluppo bis’), converted into Italian Law no. 221/2012.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, C., W.S. Hesterly, and S.P. Borgatti (1997) ‘A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms’, Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 911–45.Google Scholar
  32. Kogut, B. (2000) ‘The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maurer, I., and M. Ebers (2006) ‘Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from biotechnology start-ups’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2): 262–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malmberg, A. and P. Maskell (2000) The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering, Environment and planning, 34(3): 429–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall, A. (1919) Industry and Trade (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  36. Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  37. Maskell, P. (2001) ‘Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 921–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nell, P.C., and U. Andersson (2012) ‘The complexity of the business network context and its effect on subsidiary relational (over-) embeddedness’, International Business Review, 21(6): 1087–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD (2000) ‘The Bologna charter on SME policies, enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs in the global economy: strategies and policies’, Conference for Ministers responsible for SMEs and Industry Ministers.Google Scholar
  40. Piore, M.J., and C.F. Sabel (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  41. Podolny, J.M., and K.L. Page (1998) ‘Network forms of organization’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porter, M.E. (1998) ‘Clusters and the new economics of competition’, Harvard Business Review, 76(6): 77–90.Google Scholar
  43. Resolution no. 70/E of 30 June 2011.Google Scholar
  44. Resolution no. 89/E of 12 September 2011.Google Scholar
  45. RetImpresa (2013) Il Management dette Rett d’Impresa dalla costituzione alla gestione operativa, Il Management delle Reti d’lmpresa.Google Scholar
  46. Ricciardi, A. (2009) ‘Strategie di cooperazione tra aziende e mitigazione del rischio operativo: vantaggi competitivi delle reti di imprese’, Scritti in onore di Vittorio Coda.Google Scholar
  47. Roelandt, T.J.A., and P. den Hertog (1999) ‘Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy making: the state of the art’ in OECD (ed.) Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  48. Storper, M. (1992) ‘The limits to globalization: technology districts and international trade’, Economic Geography, 68(1): 60–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Storper, M. (2000) ‘Globalization, localization and trade’, The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, pp. 274.Google Scholar
  50. Unioncamere (2013) ‘I Contratti di Rete, Rassegna dei principali risultati quantitativi’, Elaborazioni Unioncamere su dati Infocamere (aggiornamento all’l dicembre 2013).Google Scholar
  51. Uzzi, B. (1996) ‘The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect’, American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Uzzi, B. (1997) ‘Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Elisa Giaretta and Giusy Chesini 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisa Giaretta
  • Giusy Chesini

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations