Skip to main content

From Progress to Order: the “Kurdish Openings” and the Limits to Contentious Politics in Turkey

  • Chapter
  • 459 Accesses

Part of the book series: Middle East Today ((MIET))

Abstract

Since the first electoral victory of the party in 2002, the AKP (Justice and Development Party) has set out to radically alter the nature of political structures and power relations in Turkey. Bolstered by successive electoral victories in 2007 and 2011, the AKP has altogether eliminated the influence of the military over the government and reformulated the mechanisms of the judiciary through a referendum—clearly challenging the political hegemony of the old Kemalist elite. Furthermore, the party has also initiated a series of dialogues and programs aimed to resolve the “Kurdish question” that has claimed the lives of thousands of citizens due to the ongoing low-intensity military conflict since the 1980s. All these initiatives have led some observers in Turkey and abroad to brand the AKP as a “party of progress,” a highly unconventional description for a social conservative and center-right party1 It is as if the exclusive official ideology of the Turkish state based on Turkish nationalism was changing. However, over the years, the AKP administration has not followed a consistent strategy toward the Kurdish minority but resorted to a variety of contradictory methods, from organizing private meetings with Kurdish politicians and representatives of civil society organizations to imprisoning hundreds of Kurdish activists and academics on charges of terrorism. Since the last electoral victory of the AKP in 2011, public speeches of Prime Minister (elected president in 2014) Recep Tayyip Erdo an and the party rhetoric has radically shifted to a conservative-nationalist ideology, as demonstrated in the recent transfer of Numan Kurtulmu to the AKP, the former chairman of the Islamist HAS (People’s Voice) Party, which was known for its opposition to the peace talks with the Kurdish social movement. As the AKP has consolidated its hold over the politics of Turkey, it has come under heavy criticism of its once-ardent supporters—liberal intellectuals such as the columnists of the Taraf newspaper—due to its alleged move toward the right of the political spectrum, leading some to question whether the AKP has become a “party of the order.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See B. Turam, Between Islam and the State: The Politics of Engagement (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for instance, U. Ozkinmli, “Vigilance and Apprehension: Multiculturalism, Democracy, and the ‘Kurdish Question’ in Turkey,” Middle East Critique 22, no. 1 (2013);

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Çiçek, “Elimination or Integration of Pro-Kurdish Politics: Limits of the AKP’s Democratic Initiative,” Turkish Studies 12, no. 1 (2011);

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Murat Tezcür, “Prospects for Resolution of the Kurdish Question: A Realist Perspective,” Insight Turkey 15, no 2 (2013);

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Nykanen, “Identity, Narrative and Frames: Assessing Turkey’s Kurdish Initiatives,” Insight Turkey 15, no. 2 (2013);

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Ergil, “The Kurdish Question in Turkey,” Journal of Democracy 11, no. 3 (2000);

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Kiliç, “Democratization, Human Rights and Ethnic Policies in Turkey,” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 18, no. 1 (1998);

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Updegraff, “The Kurdish Question,” Journal of Democracy 23, no. 1(2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. G. Tarrow, Power in Movement: Social Movement and Contentious Politics, 3rd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See, for instance, Tarrow, Power in Movement, Tarrow, Strangers at the Gates: Movements and States in Contentious Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Tilly, Contentious Performances (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. W. A. Gamson,, The Strategy of Social Protest, 2nd ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1990);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper, eds., Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotion (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Güneş The Kurdish National Movement in Turkey: From Protest to Resistance (London and New York: Routledge, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Somer and Evangelos G. Liaras, “Turkey’s New Kurdish Opening: Religious Versus Secular Values,” Middle East Policy 17, no. 2 (2010);

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Robins, “The Overlord State: Turkish Policy and the Kurdish Issue,” International Affairs 69, no. 4 (1993): 661.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Yegen, “Turkish Nationalism and the Kurdish Question,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30, no. 1(2007): 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Toprak, Islam and Political Development in Turkey (Leiden: E. J. Brill. 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ersel Aydinli, “Civil-Military Relations Transformed,” Journal of Democracy 23, no. 1 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Gumuscu and D. Sert, “The March 2009 Local Elections and the Inconsistent Democratic Transformation of the AKP in Turkey,” Middle East Critique, 19, no. 1 (2010);

    Google Scholar 

  21. Metin Heper and Fuat Keyman, “Double-Faced State: Political Patronage and the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey,” Middle Eastern Studies 34, no. 4 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Boyraz, “The Justice and Development Party in Turkish Politics: Islam, Democracy and State,” Turkish Studies 12, no. 1 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. For a detailed analysis of the academic debate, see. Karda, “Turkey under the Justice and Development Party: Between Transformation of ‘Islamism’ and Democratic Consolidation,” Middle East Critique 17, no. 2 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. Armstrong, “Turkish Nationalism and Turkish Islam: A New Balance,” Turkish Policy Quarterly 10, no. 4 (2012): 136.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ü. Cizre, “Turkey at the Crossroads: From ‘Change with Politics as Usual’ to Politics with Change as Usual,” Insight Turkey 13, no. 4 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Çakir, ‘Kurdish Political Movement and the “Democratic Opening,”’ Insight Turkey 12, no. 2 (2010): 180.

    Google Scholar 

  27. a Öni, “Sharing Power: Turkey’s Democratization Challenge in the Age of the AKP Hegemony,” Insight Turkey 15, no. 2 (2013): 107.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bo Aerenlund Sorensen, “The Ankara Consensus: Islamists, Kemalists and Why Turkey’s Nationalism Remains Overlooked,” Middle Eastern Studies 48, no. 4 (2012): 613;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Ta kin, “AKP’s Move to ‘Conquer’ the Center-Right: Its Prospects and Possible Impacts on the Democratization Process,” Turkish Studies 9, no. 1 (2008): 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Ha imi, “Mapping the Pathways: Public Perception and Kurdish Question,” Insight Turkey 11, no. 4 (2009): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kivanç Ulusoy, “The ‘Democratic Opening’ in Turkey: A Historical/Comparative Perspective,” Insight Turkey 12, no. 2 (2010): 84.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Neophytos G. Loizides, “State Ideology and the Kurds in Turkey,” Middle Eastern Studies 46, no. 4 (2010): 523; Nykanen, “Identity, Narrative and Frames.”

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Fawaz A. Gerges

Copyright information

© 2015 Fawaz A. Gerges

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Göksel, O. (2015). From Progress to Order: the “Kurdish Openings” and the Limits to Contentious Politics in Turkey. In: Gerges, F.A. (eds) Contentious Politics in the Middle East. Middle East Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530868_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics