Abstract
Since the first electoral victory of the party in 2002, the AKP (Justice and Development Party) has set out to radically alter the nature of political structures and power relations in Turkey. Bolstered by successive electoral victories in 2007 and 2011, the AKP has altogether eliminated the influence of the military over the government and reformulated the mechanisms of the judiciary through a referendum—clearly challenging the political hegemony of the old Kemalist elite. Furthermore, the party has also initiated a series of dialogues and programs aimed to resolve the “Kurdish question” that has claimed the lives of thousands of citizens due to the ongoing low-intensity military conflict since the 1980s. All these initiatives have led some observers in Turkey and abroad to brand the AKP as a “party of progress,” a highly unconventional description for a social conservative and center-right party1 It is as if the exclusive official ideology of the Turkish state based on Turkish nationalism was changing. However, over the years, the AKP administration has not followed a consistent strategy toward the Kurdish minority but resorted to a variety of contradictory methods, from organizing private meetings with Kurdish politicians and representatives of civil society organizations to imprisoning hundreds of Kurdish activists and academics on charges of terrorism. Since the last electoral victory of the AKP in 2011, public speeches of Prime Minister (elected president in 2014) Recep Tayyip Erdo an and the party rhetoric has radically shifted to a conservative-nationalist ideology, as demonstrated in the recent transfer of Numan Kurtulmu to the AKP, the former chairman of the Islamist HAS (People’s Voice) Party, which was known for its opposition to the peace talks with the Kurdish social movement. As the AKP has consolidated its hold over the politics of Turkey, it has come under heavy criticism of its once-ardent supporters—liberal intellectuals such as the columnists of the Taraf newspaper—due to its alleged move toward the right of the political spectrum, leading some to question whether the AKP has become a “party of the order.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See B. Turam, Between Islam and the State: The Politics of Engagement (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006).
See, for instance, U. Ozkinmli, “Vigilance and Apprehension: Multiculturalism, Democracy, and the ‘Kurdish Question’ in Turkey,” Middle East Critique 22, no. 1 (2013);
C. Çiçek, “Elimination or Integration of Pro-Kurdish Politics: Limits of the AKP’s Democratic Initiative,” Turkish Studies 12, no. 1 (2011);
G. Murat Tezcür, “Prospects for Resolution of the Kurdish Question: A Realist Perspective,” Insight Turkey 15, no 2 (2013);
J. Nykanen, “Identity, Narrative and Frames: Assessing Turkey’s Kurdish Initiatives,” Insight Turkey 15, no. 2 (2013);
D. Ergil, “The Kurdish Question in Turkey,” Journal of Democracy 11, no. 3 (2000);
A. Kiliç, “Democratization, Human Rights and Ethnic Policies in Turkey,” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 18, no. 1 (1998);
R. Updegraff, “The Kurdish Question,” Journal of Democracy 23, no. 1(2012).
S. G. Tarrow, Power in Movement: Social Movement and Contentious Politics, 3rd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 4.
See, for instance, Tarrow, Power in Movement, Tarrow, Strangers at the Gates: Movements and States in Contentious Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012);
C. Tilly, Contentious Performances (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008);
W. A. Gamson,, The Strategy of Social Protest, 2nd ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1990);
Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper, eds., Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotion (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004).
C. Güneş The Kurdish National Movement in Turkey: From Protest to Resistance (London and New York: Routledge, 2012).
M. Somer and Evangelos G. Liaras, “Turkey’s New Kurdish Opening: Religious Versus Secular Values,” Middle East Policy 17, no. 2 (2010);
P. Robins, “The Overlord State: Turkish Policy and the Kurdish Issue,” International Affairs 69, no. 4 (1993): 661.
M. Yegen, “Turkish Nationalism and the Kurdish Question,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30, no. 1(2007): 119.
B. Toprak, Islam and Political Development in Turkey (Leiden: E. J. Brill. 1981).
Ersel Aydinli, “Civil-Military Relations Transformed,” Journal of Democracy 23, no. 1 (2012).
S. Gumuscu and D. Sert, “The March 2009 Local Elections and the Inconsistent Democratic Transformation of the AKP in Turkey,” Middle East Critique, 19, no. 1 (2010);
Metin Heper and Fuat Keyman, “Double-Faced State: Political Patronage and the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey,” Middle Eastern Studies 34, no. 4 (1998).
C. Boyraz, “The Justice and Development Party in Turkish Politics: Islam, Democracy and State,” Turkish Studies 12, no. 1 (2011).
For a detailed analysis of the academic debate, see. Karda, “Turkey under the Justice and Development Party: Between Transformation of ‘Islamism’ and Democratic Consolidation,” Middle East Critique 17, no. 2 (2008).
W. Armstrong, “Turkish Nationalism and Turkish Islam: A New Balance,” Turkish Policy Quarterly 10, no. 4 (2012): 136.
Ü. Cizre, “Turkey at the Crossroads: From ‘Change with Politics as Usual’ to Politics with Change as Usual,” Insight Turkey 13, no. 4 (2011).
R. Çakir, ‘Kurdish Political Movement and the “Democratic Opening,”’ Insight Turkey 12, no. 2 (2010): 180.
a Öni, “Sharing Power: Turkey’s Democratization Challenge in the Age of the AKP Hegemony,” Insight Turkey 15, no. 2 (2013): 107.
Bo Aerenlund Sorensen, “The Ankara Consensus: Islamists, Kemalists and Why Turkey’s Nationalism Remains Overlooked,” Middle Eastern Studies 48, no. 4 (2012): 613;
Y. Ta kin, “AKP’s Move to ‘Conquer’ the Center-Right: Its Prospects and Possible Impacts on the Democratization Process,” Turkish Studies 9, no. 1 (2008): 53.
C. Ha imi, “Mapping the Pathways: Public Perception and Kurdish Question,” Insight Turkey 11, no. 4 (2009): 23.
Kivanç Ulusoy, “The ‘Democratic Opening’ in Turkey: A Historical/Comparative Perspective,” Insight Turkey 12, no. 2 (2010): 84.
See Neophytos G. Loizides, “State Ideology and the Kurds in Turkey,” Middle Eastern Studies 46, no. 4 (2010): 523; Nykanen, “Identity, Narrative and Frames.”
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Fawaz A. Gerges
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Göksel, O. (2015). From Progress to Order: the “Kurdish Openings” and the Limits to Contentious Politics in Turkey. In: Gerges, F.A. (eds) Contentious Politics in the Middle East. Middle East Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530868_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530868_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53720-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53086-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)