Skip to main content

From Repair to Enhancement: The Use of Technical Aids in the Field of Disability

  • Chapter
Inquiring into Human Enhancement

Part of the book series: Health, Technology and Society ((HTE))

Abstract

There is nothing new in the use of technology to repair and compensate for human disabilities. Throughout the centuries we find examples of prostheses and artificial limbs being used to replace lost limbs (Avan et al., 1988). Various technical aids were also used to compensate for the body’s failings or to facilitate treatment — wheeled vehicles were used to carry invalids, for example. During the 16th and 17th centuries, the first wheelchairs that could be propelled by the users themselves appeared. But the majority of these vehicles were made of wood; they were heavy, cumbersome and difficult to manoeuvre. During the 19th century, medical progress (the discovery of anaesthesia, asepsis, antibiotics, radiology, and so on) made it possible to develop new techniques to repair and compensate for deficiencies. Furthermore, the end of the 19th century saw the beginning of a change in the social treatment of disabled persons, leading to the emergence of the notion of ‘handicap’ as a replacement for the notions of infirmity, invalidity, idiocy, and so on. In other words, developments in the modes of repairing deficiencies and of compensating for disabilities correlate with changes in the definition of ‘disability’ (as ‘handicap’) and in the way persons with disabilities are integrated into society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avan L., Fardeau M. and Stiker H.-J. (1988) L’homme réparé. Artifices, victoires, défis ( Paris: Gallimard).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton L. and Oliver M. (eds) (1997) Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future ( Leeds: The Disability Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume S. (2010) ‘Bringing technology back in’ (oral presentation at the CERMES3: Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J. (1997) ‘“Growing pains” disability politics–the journey explained and described’, in Barton L. and Oliver M. (eds) Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future ( Leeds: The Disability Press ), pp. 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Léséleuc É. and Marcellini A. (2005) ‘Légitimité versus illégitimité du dopage chez les sportifs de haut-niveau. Comment se définissent les limites du non acceptable?’, Revue STAPS , 26(70), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald F. (1986) L’État providence ( Paris: Grasset).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch V. and Mathiot C. ‘L’athlète–sans les jambes’, Libération newspaper, 3/07/2007. Available at http://www.liberation.fr/grand-angle/0101106570-lathlete-sans-les-jambes(05/07/2013).

  • Kurzman S.L. (2001) ‘Presence and prosthesis: a response to Nelson and Wright’, Cultural Anthropology , 16(3), 374–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman S.L. (2002) ‘“There’s no language for this”. Communication and alignment in contemporary prosthetics’, in Ott K., Serlin D., Mihm S. (eds) Artificial Parts, Practical Lives ( New York: New York University Press ), pp. 227–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippi G. and Mattiuzzi C. (2008) ‘Pistorius ineligible for the Olympic Games: the right decision’, British Journal of Sports Medicine , 42(3), 160–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcellini A., Vidal M., Ferez S., de Léséleuc É. (2010) ‘“La chose la plus rapide sans jambes”. Oscar Pistorius ou la mise en spectacle des frontières de l’humain’, Politix (90), 139–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver M. and Barnes C. (1998) Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion ( London and New York: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quéré L. and Relieu M. (2001) Modes de locomotion et inscription spatiale des inégalités. Les déplacements des personnes atteintes de handicaps visuels et moteurs dans l’espace public ( Paris: CEMS-EHESS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez J. (1997) ‘Enjeux concrets et symboliques de l’accessibilité’, in Ravaud J.-F., Didier J.-P., Aussilloux C., Aymé S. (eds) De la déficience à la réinsertion. Recherches sur les handicaps et les personnes handicapées ( Paris: Les Éditions de l’INSERM ), pp. 139–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiker H. -J. (1997) Corps infirmes et sociétés ( Paris: Dunod).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot L. (1994) ‘Le régime de la familiarité. Les choses en personne’, Genèse, 17, 72–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay M. (1996) ‘Going back to Civvy Street: a historical account of the impact of the Everest and Jennings wheelchair for Canadian World War II veterans with spinal cord injury’, Disability & Society , 11(2), 149–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay M., Campbell A. and Hudson G.L. (2005) ‘When elevators were for pianos: an oral history account of the civilian experience of using wheelchairs in Canadian society. The first twenty-five years: 1945–1970’, Disability & Society , 20(2), 103–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigarello G. (1988) Une histoire culturelle du sport. Techniques d’hier et d’aujourd’hui (Paris: Éd. Revue EPS-Laffont).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignier N., Ravaud J.-F., Winance M., Lepoutre F.-X. and Ville I. (2008) ‘Demographics of wheelchair users in France: results of national community-based handicaps-incapacités-dépendance surveys’, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine , 40(3), 231–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D.J. (2009) ‘And they shall walk: ideal versus reality in polio rehabilitation in the United States’, Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia, LXI(1), 175–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winance M. (2006) ‘Trying out wheelchair. The mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment’, Science, Technology and Human Values , 31(1), 52–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winance M. (2010) ‘Mobilités en fauteuil roulant: processus d’ajustement corporel et d’arrangements pratiques avec l’espace, physique et social’, Politix (90), 115–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Myriam Winance, Anne Marcellini and Éric de Léséleuc

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winance, M., Marcellini, A., de Léséleuc, É. (2015). From Repair to Enhancement: The Use of Technical Aids in the Field of Disability. In: Bateman, S., Gayon, J., Allouche, S., Goffette, J., Marzano, M. (eds) Inquiring into Human Enhancement. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530073_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics