Abstract
There is nothing new in the use of technology to repair and compensate for human disabilities. Throughout the centuries we find examples of prostheses and artificial limbs being used to replace lost limbs (Avan et al., 1988). Various technical aids were also used to compensate for the body’s failings or to facilitate treatment — wheeled vehicles were used to carry invalids, for example. During the 16th and 17th centuries, the first wheelchairs that could be propelled by the users themselves appeared. But the majority of these vehicles were made of wood; they were heavy, cumbersome and difficult to manoeuvre. During the 19th century, medical progress (the discovery of anaesthesia, asepsis, antibiotics, radiology, and so on) made it possible to develop new techniques to repair and compensate for deficiencies. Furthermore, the end of the 19th century saw the beginning of a change in the social treatment of disabled persons, leading to the emergence of the notion of ‘handicap’ as a replacement for the notions of infirmity, invalidity, idiocy, and so on. In other words, developments in the modes of repairing deficiencies and of compensating for disabilities correlate with changes in the definition of ‘disability’ (as ‘handicap’) and in the way persons with disabilities are integrated into society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avan L., Fardeau M. and Stiker H.-J. (1988) L’homme réparé. Artifices, victoires, défis ( Paris: Gallimard).
Barton L. and Oliver M. (eds) (1997) Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future ( Leeds: The Disability Press ).
Blume S. (2010) ‘Bringing technology back in’ (oral presentation at the CERMES3: Paris).
Campbell J. (1997) ‘“Growing pains” disability politics–the journey explained and described’, in Barton L. and Oliver M. (eds) Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future ( Leeds: The Disability Press ), pp. 78–89.
de Léséleuc É. and Marcellini A. (2005) ‘Légitimité versus illégitimité du dopage chez les sportifs de haut-niveau. Comment se définissent les limites du non acceptable?’, Revue STAPS , 26(70), 33–47.
Ewald F. (1986) L’État providence ( Paris: Grasset).
Hirsch V. and Mathiot C. ‘L’athlète–sans les jambes’, Libération newspaper, 3/07/2007. Available at http://www.liberation.fr/grand-angle/0101106570-lathlete-sans-les-jambes(05/07/2013).
Kurzman S.L. (2001) ‘Presence and prosthesis: a response to Nelson and Wright’, Cultural Anthropology , 16(3), 374–87.
Kurzman S.L. (2002) ‘“There’s no language for this”. Communication and alignment in contemporary prosthetics’, in Ott K., Serlin D., Mihm S. (eds) Artificial Parts, Practical Lives ( New York: New York University Press ), pp. 227–46.
Lippi G. and Mattiuzzi C. (2008) ‘Pistorius ineligible for the Olympic Games: the right decision’, British Journal of Sports Medicine , 42(3), 160–1.
Marcellini A., Vidal M., Ferez S., de Léséleuc É. (2010) ‘“La chose la plus rapide sans jambes”. Oscar Pistorius ou la mise en spectacle des frontières de l’humain’, Politix (90), 139–65.
Oliver M. and Barnes C. (1998) Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion ( London and New York: Longman).
Quéré L. and Relieu M. (2001) Modes de locomotion et inscription spatiale des inégalités. Les déplacements des personnes atteintes de handicaps visuels et moteurs dans l’espace public ( Paris: CEMS-EHESS).
Sanchez J. (1997) ‘Enjeux concrets et symboliques de l’accessibilité’, in Ravaud J.-F., Didier J.-P., Aussilloux C., Aymé S. (eds) De la déficience à la réinsertion. Recherches sur les handicaps et les personnes handicapées ( Paris: Les Éditions de l’INSERM ), pp. 139–46.
Stiker H. -J. (1997) Corps infirmes et sociétés ( Paris: Dunod).
Thévenot L. (1994) ‘Le régime de la familiarité. Les choses en personne’, Genèse, 17, 72–101.
Tremblay M. (1996) ‘Going back to Civvy Street: a historical account of the impact of the Everest and Jennings wheelchair for Canadian World War II veterans with spinal cord injury’, Disability & Society , 11(2), 149–69.
Tremblay M., Campbell A. and Hudson G.L. (2005) ‘When elevators were for pianos: an oral history account of the civilian experience of using wheelchairs in Canadian society. The first twenty-five years: 1945–1970’, Disability & Society , 20(2), 103–16.
Vigarello G. (1988) Une histoire culturelle du sport. Techniques d’hier et d’aujourd’hui (Paris: Éd. Revue EPS-Laffont).
Vignier N., Ravaud J.-F., Winance M., Lepoutre F.-X. and Ville I. (2008) ‘Demographics of wheelchair users in France: results of national community-based handicaps-incapacités-dépendance surveys’, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine , 40(3), 231–9.
Wilson D.J. (2009) ‘And they shall walk: ideal versus reality in polio rehabilitation in the United States’, Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia, LXI(1), 175–92.
Winance M. (2006) ‘Trying out wheelchair. The mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment’, Science, Technology and Human Values , 31(1), 52–72.
Winance M. (2010) ‘Mobilités en fauteuil roulant: processus d’ajustement corporel et d’arrangements pratiques avec l’espace, physique et social’, Politix (90), 115–37.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Myriam Winance, Anne Marcellini and Éric de Léséleuc
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winance, M., Marcellini, A., de Léséleuc, É. (2015). From Repair to Enhancement: The Use of Technical Aids in the Field of Disability. In: Bateman, S., Gayon, J., Allouche, S., Goffette, J., Marzano, M. (eds) Inquiring into Human Enhancement. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530073_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530073_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56354-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53007-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)