Skip to main content

The Asian Growth Model: Myth or Reality?

  • Chapter
An Enquiry into the Asian Growth Model
  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is that rapid and sustained growth achieved by a group of Asian economies made researchers, policymakers and decision makers in the world of international business search for a plausible and unique Asian model of growth. This issue has been examined from different pertinent angles in this chapter, and the conclusion is that no such sure-fire miracle growth model exists for the high-performing economies of Asia. This is not to deny that high-growth Asian economies, mutatis mutandis, adopted certain common strategies. Industrial policy, role of the government and developmental state are some of the important issues covered in this chapter. This chapter revisits the debate on the ‘Beijing consensus’ vis-à-vis the ‘Washington consensus’. Old and new structuralist theories are also dealt with in detail in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amable, B. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineage of the Twenty-First Century. London. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D. 2013. “Asia’s Titans Play the Long Game”. Global Brief. 5 March. Available at http://globalbrief.ca/blog/2013/03/05/asia%E2%80%99s-titans-play-the-long-game/

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B.S. 2006. “The Chinese Economy: Progress and Challenges”. Paper presented at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, 15 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, I. 2010. The End of Free Market. New York. Portfolio. Pengu in Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, S. 2011a. “Rethinking the ‘China Model’”. East Asia Forum. 29 December. Available at http://www.eastasiaforum.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, S. 2011b. “The ‘China Model’ and the Global Crisis”. International Affairs. Vol. 87. No. 6. pp. 1323–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, V. (ed.) 2006. Technology, Adaptation and Exports. Washington DC. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.J. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder. London. Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. 2009. “Anatomy of Growth and Transformation of the Economies of China and India”, in S. Ghatak and P. Levine (eds) Development Macroeconomics. London and New York. Routledge. pp. 26–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. and D.S.G. Goodman. 2012. “The China Model: One Country and Six Authors”. Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 21. No. 73. pp. 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M., G. Dosi and J.E. Stiglitz (eds) 2009. Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation. New York. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. and N. Wang. 2013. “How China became Capitalist?” Cato Policy Report. January–February. Vol. XXXV. No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Dilip K. 2006. China and India: A Tale of Two Economies. London and New York. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Dilip K. 2008. The Chinese Economic Renaissance: Apocalypse or Cornucopia. Basingstoke. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Das, Dilip K. 2011. The Asian Economy: Spearheading the Recovery from the Global Financial Crisis. London and New York. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Dilip K. 2013. China and the Asian Economies. London and New York. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. 2013. “IMF Economists Take Fresh Look at Government Favors”. The Wall Street Journal. 28 January, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, K.J. 2012. “Not A Piece: Developmental State”, in A. Walter and X. Zhang (eds) East Asian Capitalism. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 46–67.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, E.T. 2012. “State–Business Linkages in Southeast Asia”, in A. Walter and X. Zhang (eds) East Asian Capitalism. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 68–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and D.W. Gingerich. 2009. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economies”. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 39. No. 3. pp. 449–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and D. Soskice. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism”, in P.A. Hall, and D. Soskice (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 1–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven. CT. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. and A.C. Tan. 2012. China, India and the End of Development Models. Basingstoke. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. 2008. Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. 2011. “Rethinking the Beijing Consensus”. Asia Policy. Seattle. National Bureau of Economic Research, No. 11, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. 2010. “The Myth of Beijing Consensus”. Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 19. No. 65. pp. 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R.A. and C. Riskin. 1998. “Income and Inequality in China: Composition, Distribution and Growth of Household Income”. The China Quarterly. Vol. 154. No. 1 pp. 221–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchiki, A. 2007. “Industrial Policy in Asia”. Tokyo. Institute of Developing Economies. Discussion Paper No. 128. October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. 1973. “Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections”. American Economic Review. Vol. 63. No. 3. pp. 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L.J., Y. Qian and G. Roland. 2000. “Reform Without Losers: An Interpretation of China’s Dual-Track Approach to Transition”. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 108. No. 1. pp. 120–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. and A. Mathews. 2010. “From Washington Consensus to BeST Consensus for World Development”. Asian Pacific Economic Literature. Vol. 24. No. 1. pp. 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. 2010. “Six Steps for Strategic Government Intervention”. Global Policy. Vol. 1. No. 3. pp. 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. (ed.) 2012. New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development. Washington DC. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. and C. Monga. 2012. “The Growth Report and New Structural Economics”, in J.Y. Lin (ed.) New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development. Washington DC. World Bank. pp. 81–112.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute (MGI). 2013. “Beyond Korean Style: Shaping a New Growth Formula”. San Francisco. April.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, C.A. 2012. “Sino-Capitalism: China’s Reemergence and the International Political Economy”. World Politics. Vol. 64. No. 4. pp. 741–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, C.A. 2013. “How Emerging Forms of Capitalism are Changing the Global Economic Order”. Honolulu, Hawai’i. Asia Pacific Issues. No. 107. February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. 2010. “China’s Distinctive System: Can it be a Model for Others?” Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 19. No. 65. pp. 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, G. and E. Roth. 2013. “China’s Innovation Engine Picks up Speed”. McKinsey Quarterly. June 2013. Available at http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/innovation/chinas_innovation_engine_picks_up_speed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W. 2010. “Western System versus Chinese System”. Nottingham. University of Nottingham. China Policy Institute. Briefing Series 61. July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramo, J.C. 2004. The Beijing Consensus. London. Foreign Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, E.S. 2007. How Rich Countries Got Rich… and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London. Constable and Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2006a. “Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion?” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 64. No. 4. pp. 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2006b. “What’s So Special about China’s Exports?” Cambridge. MA. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 11947. January.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2010. “The Return of Industrial Policy”. Project Syndicate. 10 April. Available at http://project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-return-of-industrial-policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M.R. and M. Paunescu. 2011. “Changing Varieties of Capitalism and Revealed Comparative Advantage from 1990 to 2005”. Socio-Economic Review. Vol. 9. No. 1. pp. 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, E.S. 2010. Playing Our Game: Why China’s Economic Rise Doesn’t Threaten the West. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 2005a. “Stiglitz Backs Strong Government Intervention”. Interview in Merco Press, 24 August. Available at http://en.mercopress.com/2005/08/24/stiglitz-backs-strong-government-intervention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 2005b. The Post Washington Consensus. New York. Columbia University. The Initiative for Policy Dialogue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 2010. Freefall: America, Free Markets and the Sinking of the World Economy. New York. W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E.F. 2011. Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Cambridge. MA. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R.H. 2003. Governing the Markets. Princeton. NJ. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R.H. 2009. “Rethinking Industrial Policy for Low Income Countries”. African Development Review. Vol. 21. No. 2. pp. 352–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R.H. 2012. “Return to Industrial Policy?” International Review of Applied Economics. Vol. 26. No. 2. pp. 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A. and X. Zhang. 2012a. “Understanding Variations and Changes in East Asian Capitalism”, in A. Walter and X. Zhang (eds) East Asian Capitalism. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 247–280.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A. and X. Zhang. 2012b. “Debating East Asian Capitalism: Issues and Themes”, in A. Walter and X. Zhang (eds) East Asian Capitalism. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 3–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (ed.) 1990. Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington DC. Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. New York. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1997. World Development Report 1997. Washington DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. 2010. “The China Model: Can it Replace the Western Model of Modernization?” Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 19. No. 65. pp. 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. 2011. “The China Model and the Authoritarian State”. East Asia Forum, 31 August. Available at http://www.eastasiaforum.org.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Dilip K. Das

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Das, D.K. (2015). The Asian Growth Model: Myth or Reality?. In: An Enquiry into the Asian Growth Model. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137529275_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics