Abstract
The key question posed in this book is whether or not the Russian annexation of Ukraine represents a new “turning point” in US-European-Russian-Chinese-Japanese-Indian relations that could result in deeper friction and crisis? Or can the United States and Europe adopt a different position that could permit Russia to gradually reintegrate itself into a US-European alliance and political-economic network, thus reducing the real chances of a more intractable crisis?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. M. Keynes, A Treatise on Probability ( London: Macmillan, 1921 ), 309.
Karl Popper, The Poverty of Historicism, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 1961); Richard E. Neustadt and Ernest R. May, Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers (New York: Freedom Press, 1986); and Margaret Macmillan, Dangerous Games: The Uses and Abuses of History ( New York: Random House: 2009 ).
Jean-François Lyotard, The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984, reprint 1997).
Edward Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919– 1939 (New York: Perennial, 2001).
George Liska, Ways of Power ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990 ).
Niall Ferguson, Colossus ( New York: Penguin, 2004 ), 220.
Copyright information
© 2015 Hall Gardner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gardner, H. (2015). A Cross-Historical Method. In: Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528179_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528179_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55756-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52817-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)