Abstract
Most existing theories attribute the limited evolvability of premodern science, technology, and economy to external factors. Like new growth theorists, unified growth theorists, and world-system theorists, most scholars on both sides of the great divergence debate tacitly assume unlimited human creativity, leading to their adoption of such external conditions as globalization, capitalism, property rights, and resource endowments as the explanatory variables. Most of them have not paid enough attention to the epistemic limits of natural entrepreneurs and knowers.
But by far the greatest hindrance and aberration of the human understanding proceeds from the dullness, incompetency, and deceptions of the senses; in that things which strike the sense outweigh things which do not immediately strike it, though they be more important.
—Francis Bacon, 1620, The New Organon
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2016 Dengjian Jin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jin, D. (2016). The Limits of Natural Knowers. In: The Great Knowledge Transcendence. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137527943_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137527943_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57571-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52794-3
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)