Abstract
Following the initial work on portfolio theory in the 1950s, volatility has become an extremely important concept in finance, appearing regularly in models of, for example, asset pricing and risk management. Much of the interest in volatility has to do with it not being directly observable, and several alternative measures have been developed to approximate it empirically. The most common measure of volatility has been the unconditional standard deviation of historical returns. The use of this measure, however, is severely limited by it not necessarily being an appropriate representation of financial risk and by the fact that returns tend not to be independent and identically distributed, so making the standard deviation a potentially poor estimate of underlying volatility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Bollerslev, ‘On the correlation structure for the generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic process’, Journal of Time Series Analysis 8 (1988), 121–32.
See, for example, G. William Schwert, ‘Why does stock market volatility change over time?’, Journal of Finance 44 (1989), 1115–53.
See Zhuanxing Ding, Granger and Engle, ‘A long memory property of stock returns and a new model’, Journal of Empirical Finance 1 (1993), 83–106.
See Daniel B. Nelson, “Conditional heteroskedasticity in stock returns”, Econometrica 59 (1991), 347–70.
See, respectively, Matthew L. Higgins and Anil K. Bera, ‘A class of nonlinear ARCH models’, International Economic Review 33 (1992), 137–58;
Jean-Michael Zakoian, ‘Threshold heteroskedastic models’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18 (1994), 931–55;
and Lawrence R. Glosten, Ravi Jegannathan and David E. Runkle, ‘Relationship between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks’, Journal of Finance 48 (1993), 1779–1801.
See Engle and G.G.J. Lee, ‘A permanent and transitory component model of stock return volatility’, in Engle and Halbert White (editors), Cointegration, Causality and Forecasting: a Festschrift in Honor of Clive W.J. Granger (Oxford University Press, 1999 ), 475–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Terence C. Mills
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mills, T.C. (2015). Modelling Volatility using GARCH Processes. In: Time Series Econometrics. Palgrave Texts in Econometrics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137525338_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137525338_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57909-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52533-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)