Skip to main content

Modelling Volatility using GARCH Processes

  • Chapter
  • 1020 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Texts in Econometrics ((PTEC))

Abstract

Following the initial work on portfolio theory in the 1950s, volatility has become an extremely important concept in finance, appearing regularly in models of, for example, asset pricing and risk management. Much of the interest in volatility has to do with it not being directly observable, and several alternative measures have been developed to approximate it empirically. The most common measure of volatility has been the unconditional standard deviation of historical returns. The use of this measure, however, is severely limited by it not necessarily being an appropriate representation of financial risk and by the fact that returns tend not to be independent and identically distributed, so making the standard deviation a potentially poor estimate of underlying volatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Bollerslev, ‘On the correlation structure for the generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic process’, Journal of Time Series Analysis 8 (1988), 121–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, G. William Schwert, ‘Why does stock market volatility change over time?’, Journal of Finance 44 (1989), 1115–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See Zhuanxing Ding, Granger and Engle, ‘A long memory property of stock returns and a new model’, Journal of Empirical Finance 1 (1993), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See Daniel B. Nelson, “Conditional heteroskedasticity in stock returns”, Econometrica 59 (1991), 347–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See, respectively, Matthew L. Higgins and Anil K. Bera, ‘A class of nonlinear ARCH models’, International Economic Review 33 (1992), 137–58;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jean-Michael Zakoian, ‘Threshold heteroskedastic models’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18 (1994), 931–55;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. and Lawrence R. Glosten, Ravi Jegannathan and David E. Runkle, ‘Relationship between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks’, Journal of Finance 48 (1993), 1779–1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. See Engle and G.G.J. Lee, ‘A permanent and transitory component model of stock return volatility’, in Engle and Halbert White (editors), Cointegration, Causality and Forecasting: a Festschrift in Honor of Clive W.J. Granger (Oxford University Press, 1999 ), 475–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Terence C. Mills

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mills, T.C. (2015). Modelling Volatility using GARCH Processes. In: Time Series Econometrics. Palgrave Texts in Econometrics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137525338_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics