Abstract
Love and alchemy make strange bedfellows in medieval literature. In the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, vernacular poets utilized the materials and methods of alchemy as a means of articulating the complicated process of falling in love. This poetic strategy was used by authors ranging from Jean de Meun to John Gower, who seamlessly weave long passages on alchemy into the fabric of their poetry. In the Roman de la Rose, for example, human bodies—afflicted by “lovesickness”—are understood in terms of alchemy’s furnaces and distillations: the god of Love, like an alchemist, operates the lover’s “athanor” (Arabic: at tannūr), an alchemical digesting furnace used for heating the alembic, which is made analogous to the lover’s own heart (3.6382–404).1 Indeed, the final product of a courtly lover’s repeated bodily distillations is the refined tears of fine amor—the “purified” and perfected love.2 Alchemy’s transmutations, Jean later argues, are vivifying in comparison to a painted scene of courtly ladies and handsome bachelors holding one another in love’s dance.3 In the Confessio amantis, Gower’s alchemy in Book 4 (lines 2457–632) also shifts in meaning within the context of fine amor and his discussion of the lover’s sloth. In sum, medieval poets would successfully amalgamate imagery drawn from both alchemical treatises and the well-known handbooks on love, as the behavior and experience of medieval lovers in many ways reflected the art of alchemy itself. This literary tradition perhaps originates from the famous Epistola solis ad lunam crescentem, an allegorical poem known by Chaucer (see chapter 3), which compares the chemical combination of alchemy’s metals to the bonds of love between a wife and husband, embracing one another in sexual union.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
All citations are taken from Guillaume de Lorris and Jean de Meun, Le Roman de la Rose, ed. Ernest Langlois, 5 vols., SATF (Paris: Firmin-Didot (vols. 1–2) and Champion (vols. 3–5), 1914–24).
For the translation, see Guillaume de Lorris and Jean de Meun, The Romance of the Rose, trans. Charles Dahlberg, 3rd ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).
see Jill Mann’s article, “Falling in Love in the Middle Ages,” in Traditions and Innovations in the Study of Medieval English Literature: The Influence of Derek Brewer, ed. Charlotte Brewer and Barry Windeatt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 88–110.
Judith Scherer Herz, “The Canon’s Yeoman’s Prologue and Tale,” MP 58 (1961): 235.
Michael A. Calabrese, “Meretricious Mixtures: Gold, Dung, and the Canon’s Yeoman’s Prologue and Tale,” CR 27 (1993): 277.
Richard Kieckhefer, Magic in the Middle Ages, Canto ed. (1989; repr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 134.
Larry Scanlon, “Sweet Persuasion: The Subject of Fortune in Troilus and Criseyde,” in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde: “Subgit to alle Poesy e,” Essays in Criticism, ed. R. A. Shoaf (Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1992), 212.
A. C. Spearing, “Time in Troilus and Criseyde,” in Traditions and Innovations in the Study of Medieval English Literature: The Influence of Derek Brewer, ed. Charlotte Brewer and Barry Windeatt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 63.
Mark J. Bruhn, “Art, Anxiety, and Alchemy in the Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale,” CR 33 (1999): 308.
See also Lee Patterson, “Perpetual Motion: Alchemy and the Technology of the Self,” SAC 15 (1993): 25–57;
Albertus Magnus, Libellus de alchimia, trans. Sister Virginia Heines, S. C. N. from the Borgnet Latin edition, foreword by Pearl Kibre (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1958), 27.
Jill Mann, “Troilus’ Swoon,” CR 14 (1980): 322–3.
Dorothee Metlitzki, The Matter of Araby in Medieval England (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1977), 83.
Lyndy Abraham, A Dictionary of Alchemical Imagery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Albertus Magnus, Book of Minerals, trans. Dorothy Wyckoff (Oxford: Clarendon, 1967), 204;
For the Latin text, see Albertus Magnus, Opera omnia, ed. Auguste Borgnet (Paris, 1890–99), 5:4.1; 83.
Petrus Bonus, Pretiosa margarita novella, ed. James Lacinius (Venice: Aldus, 1546), 112.
See also Thomas Aquinas [pseudo], Aurora Consurgens: A Document Attributed to Thomas Aquinas on the Problem of Opposites in Alchemy, ed. Marie-Louise von Franz, trans. R. F. C Hull and A. S. B. Glover (New York: Pantheon, 1996), 125nl8.
Jill Mann, “Chance and Destiny in Troilus and Criseyde and the Knight’s Tale,” in The Cambridge Companion to Chaucer, ed. Piero Boitani and Jill Mann (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 104.
See Barry Windeatt’s note in his parallel-text edition: Troilus and Criseyde: A New Edition of The Book of Troilus (London and New York: Longman 1984), 269nn400–6.
Morton W. Bloomfield, “Distance and Predestination in Troilus and Criseyde,” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 72 (1957): 19.
John Gower, Confessio Amantis, ed. G. C. Macaulay, EETS extra series 81 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1899–1902; repr., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), 4.2569–74.
Lee Stavenhagen, ed. and trans., A Testament of Alchemy: Being the Revelations of Morienus, Ancient Adept and Hermit of Jerusalem to Khalid Ihn Yazid Ihn MuAwiyya… (Hanover, NH: Brandeis University Press, 1974), 10–11.
Jonathan Hughes, The Rise of Alchemy in Fourteenth-Century England (London and New York: Continuum, 2012), 50, paraphrasing Bonus, Pretiosa, 153.
See also Theatrum Chemicum, ed. Lazarus Zetzner, 3rd ed. (Strasbourg: Zetzner, 1659–61) 5:593; 5:614.
Conrad of Hirsau, “Dialogus Super Auctores,” in Accessus ad Auctores, Bernard d’Utrect, Conrad d’Hirsau, ed. R. B. C. Huygens (Leiden: Brill, 1970), 114, lines 1335ff.
Hugh W. Salzberg, From Caveman to Chemist: Circumstances and Achievements (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1991), 76.
R.J. Forbes, A Short History of the Art of Distillation: From the Beginnings up to the Death of Cellier Blumenthal (Leiden: Brill, 1970), 60–1.
See R. G. W. Anderson, “The Archaeology of Chemistry,” in Instruments and Experimentation in the History of Chemistry, ed. Frederic L. Holmes and Trevor H. Levere (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000), 5–34.
P. G. Maxwell-Stuart, The Chemical Choir: A History of Alchemy (New York: Continuum, 2008), 60.
Petrus Bonus, The New Pearl of Great Price, trans. Arthur Edward Waite (London, 1894; repr., London: Arno Press, 1974), 166.
William R. Newman, Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), 64.
Joseph E. Grennen, “Chaucer’s Characterization of the Canon and His Yeoman, “Journal of the History of Ideas 25 (1964): 280.
For an edition, see Avicenna [pseudo], De anima, in Artis chemicae principes, Avicenna atque Geher (Basel: Pietro Perna, 1572), 1–147.
See Erik J. Holmyard, Alchemy (Hardmondsworth: Penguin, 1957), 126.
Roger Bacon, “Opus minus,” in Opera quaedam hactenus inedita, 1, Opus tertium, Opus minus, Compendium philosophiae, ed. J. S. Brewer (London: Longman, 1859), 375;
L. DeVun, Prophecy, Alchemy, and the End of Time: John of Rupescissa in the Late Middle Ages (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), 123.
Mary Carruthers, “On Affliction and Reading, Weeping and Argument: Chaucer’s Lachrymose Troilus in Context,” Representations 93 (2006): 9–10.
Will H. L. Ogrinc, “Western Society and Alchemy from 1200 to 1500,” Journal of Medieval History 6 (1980): 108.
See, for example, a discussion of Roger Bacon’s writings in William R. Newman, “Medieval Alchemy,” in The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 2: Medieval Science, ed. David C. Lindberg and Michael H. Shank (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 393.
Albertus Magnus writes, “When sulphur, black and corrupt, comes into contact with quicksilver, lead is made. Aristotle says of this that lead is leprous gold”: A Source Book in Medieval Science, ed. Edward Grant (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974), 589.
Frank Grady, “The Boethian Reader of Troilus and Criseyde,” CR 33 (1999): 243–4.
See also Barry Windeatt, Oxford Gudies to Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 301.
For a brief critical summary of the ending, see John Conlee, “The Meaning of Troilus’ Ascension to the Eighth Sphere,” CR 1 (1972): 27–36.
Delany makes use of the theory of alienation as articulated by Bertolt Brecht: “Techniques of Alienation in Troilus and Criseyde,” in The Uses of Criticism, ed. A. P. Foulkes (Bern: Lang, 1976), 77–95.
Evans utilizes modern critical concepts developed by Jacques Derrida and formalist Viktor Shklovsky in “‘Making Strange’: The Narrator (?), the Ending (?) and Chaucer’s ‘Troilus,’” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 87 (1986): 227.
See, for example, Peter Dronke, “The Conclusion of Troilus and Criseyde,” Medium Aevum 33 (1964): 47–52;
P. M. Kean, “Chaucer’s Dealings with a Stanza of Il Filostrato and the Epilogue of Troilus and Criseyde,” Medium Aevum 33 (1964): 36–46.
In addition to Windeatt’s critical summary of the ending, see for example Monica E. McAlpine, The Genre of “Troilus and Criseyde” (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978), 237nl9.
Julius Ruska, ed., Turba Philosophorum: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Alchemie (Berlin: Springer, 1931), 141.
Lynn Thorndike, History of Magic and Experimental Science (New York: Columbia University Press, 1923), 3:76.
See also Lawrence M. Principe, Secrets of Alchemy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012), 68.
see Robert Kilburn Root, The Book of Troilus and Criseyde, ed. Robert Kilburn Root (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1926), 559–62;
For a standard, twelfth-century Latin translation of the Emerald Tablet of Hermes, see Robert Steele and Dorothea Waley Singer, “The Emerald Table,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 21 (1928): 485–501.
See John Read, Through Alchemy to Chemistry (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), 22.
Epseth Whitney, “What’s Wrong with the Pardoner?: Complexion Theory, the Phlegmatic Man, and Effeminacy,” CR 45 (2011): 363.
see Hugh Feiss, The Selected Works of Peter of Celle (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian, 1987), 131–41.
Jessica Rosenfeld, Ethics and Enjoyment in Late Medieval Poetry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 61–2.
A. C. Spearing, Chaucer: “Troilus and Criseyde” (London: Edward Arnold, 1976), 63.
Taylor, “The Alchemy of Spring in Chaucer’s General Prologue,” CR 17 (1982): 2–3.
Newman, Medieval Crossover: Reading the Secular against the Sacred (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013), 8.
Robert R. Edwards, “Pandarus’s ‘Unthrift’ and the Problem of Desire in Troilus and Criseyde” Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde: “Subgit to alle Poesye,” Essays in Criticism, ed. R. A. Shoaf (Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1992), 85.
Copyright information
© 2015 Alexander N. Gabrovsky
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gabrovsky, A.N. (2015). “As Licour Out of a Lambyc Ful Faste”: Love and Alchemy in Troilus and Criseyde. In: Chaucer the Alchemist. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137523914_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137523914_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55563-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52391-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)